Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

GAYA BAHASA RETORIKA TAJĀHUL AL-‘ĀRIF : ANALISIS SURAT AL-ANBIYA’: RHETORICAL LANGUAGE STYLE OF TAJĀHUL AL-‘ĀRIF: AN ANALYSIS IN SURAT AL-ANBIYA’ Hakiem, Marsekal Rahman
El-Jaudah : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): El-Jaudah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab
Publisher : Department of Arabic Education of State Collage for Islamic Studies of Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/ej.v4i1.1076

Abstract

مستخلص البحث: تجاهل العارف من أساليب القرآن الكريم، فهو أحد مبحث من مباحث علم البديع في البلاغة ضمن المحسّنات المعنوية. وهو عبارة عن الأسئلة في القرآن والاستفهام غير حقيقي جاءت بمعان مختلفة. وهذه الأسئلة جميعها جاءت من لسان الله تعالى، أي الأسئلة التي طرحها ربّنا تعالى لتعلم أغراضها الفرعية ولتكون عونًا للمخاطبين في طريقهم إلى الصراط المستقيم ولأن الله بكل شيء عليم. والهدف من هذا البحث أي تحليل أساليب تجاهل العارف تحليلا بلاغيّا في سورة الأنبياء وكشف معاني وأغراض الأسئلة التي جاءت بأسلوب تجاهل العارف. سلك هذا البحث منهجًا كيفيًا واستخدم الباحث المدخل المكتبي في جمع البيانات، فكلُ آيات في سورة الأنبياء جاءت بأسلوب تجاهل العارف تكون مصدر بيانات البحث. أما الطريقة المستخدمة في تحليل البيانات أي تحليل المضمون، تعرف بها الجمل أو الآيات جاءت بأسلوب تجاهل العارف في سورة الأنبياء وصفية تامة ثم حلّل الباحث معانيها. ونتيجة هذا البحث أي : إنّ في سورة الأنبياء 18 آيةَ الاستفهام، 5 منها ليست من الأسلوب تجاهل العارف و13 منها جاءت بأساليب تجاهل العارف ووجد الباحث من هذه الآيات 15 جملةً فيها تجاهل العارف. والأغراض البلاغية من الجمل التي فيها أساليب تجاهل العارف فيما يلي: الإنكار إحدى عشرة آيةً، والتهديد والوعيد آيةً واحدةً، والتعجب آيتينِ اثنتينِ، والتقرير آيةً واحدةً، والتقريع آيةً واحدةً، والأمر والتحضيض آيتينِ اثنتينِ، والارشاد آيةً واحدةً.
Kelayakan Instrumen TOAFL sebagai Alat Ukur Kemampuan Membaca Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Hakiem, Marsekal Rahman; Abdurrohman, Muhammad Uwais; Faturrahman, Muhammad Irfan
Kalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Arabic Education & Arabic Studies
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (P3M) STAI DR. KHEZ. Muttaqien Purwakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52593/klm.06.1.11

Abstract

Evaluation of Arabic language learning requires a valid and reliable instrument to measure students' abilities accurately. This study aims to analyze the feasibility of the ITMAM (Ikhtibar Tahdid Mustawa al-'Arabiyyah lil Muta'allimin) instrument as a measuring tool for the Arabic reading skills of STITMA Yogyakarta students. The research method uses a descriptive quantitative approach by analyzing 60 questions tested on 311 students using SPSS version 25 software to test validity, reliability, level of difficulty and discriminatory power. Analysis is needed to ensure the quality of the test instrument that can provide accurate measurement results and become the basis for effective learning evaluation. The results showed that all questions were valid and reliable, with 65% having a moderate difficulty level, 37.7% at an easy level and 3.3% at a difficult level. The results of the Discriminatory Power Test showed that 60% of the questions were accepted well and 40% needed revision so the ITMAM instrument is suitable for use as a standard evaluation tool for Arabic reading ability with several improvements to certain questions.
Meningkatkan efektivitas metode belajar matematika melalui model TANDUR Aditya, Anggie Yudistira; Hakiem, Marsekal Rahman
Primatika : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/primatika.v14i1.4698

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji efektivitas model pembelajaran TANDUR dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika. Metode menggunakan desain eksperimen dalam pendekatan kuantitatif. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 72 siswa kelas 7 SMP Muhammadiyah 2 kalasan dibagi menjadi kelompok eksperimen kelas 7A sebagai kelompok uji dan 7B sebagai kelompok acuan. Sebelum intervensi, rerata capaian belajar pada kelompok uji yaitu 63,97, sedangkan kelompok acuan 61,14. Setelah penerapan model TANDUR, nilai rata-rata kelompok uji menjadi 79,08 lebih tinggi dari nilai minimum ketuntasan belajar 72. Uji normalitas menampilkan kedua kelompok berdistribusi normal. Sedangkan uji homogenitas menampilkan bahwa variasi kedua kelompok adalah homogen. Uji t menampilkan perbedaan model TANDUR lebih efektif dibandingkan metode konvensional. Selain peningkatan hasil belajar, penelitian ini juga menunjukkan adanya peningkatan keaktifan siswa dalam pembelajaran. Data observasi meninjau siswa di kelas uji aktif bertanya 50% dibanding 13% di kelas acuan, menjawab pertanyaan guru 61% dibanding 19,4%, serta berdiskusi dalam kelompok 77% dibanding 25% dan lebih sering memberikan tanggapan teman 55,6% dibanding 16,7%. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa model TANDUR dapat menjadi alternatif efektif dalam pembelajaran matematika. Dengan demikian, model pembelajaran TANDUR tidak hanya meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa juga mendorong keaktifan dan keterlibatan siswa dalam proses pembelajaran.
Exam Anxiety in Online Oral Assessments: CEFR-Based Offline Arabic Oral Exams in High Schools Hakiem, Marsekal Rahman; Abdurrohman, Muhammad Uwais; Faturrahman, Muhammad Irfan; Fanani, Muchammad Fathoni
Insyirah: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab dan Studi Islam Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/insyirah.v8i1.13175

Abstract

Students reported experiencing higher anxiety when taking online oral tests compared to face-to-face, which directly impacted their performance. This study aims to reveal students' perceptions of the implementation and impact of offline oral exams and the results of students' oral exam assessments based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR) level. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach with a case study method. The implementation of this research was at a Senior High School in Yogyakarta. The study subjects were 30 grade X SMA/MA students selected through purposive sampling. This concludes that implementing offline CEFR-based Arabic oral exams in high schools psychologically impacts students; out of 30 students, 23 felt anxious when facing the oral exam. However, 21 students felt ready to face the oral exam, 27 also believed it could assess their language skills fairly, and 28 students were more comfortable and chose offline oral exams than online.
GAYA BAHASA RETORIKA TAJ?HUL AL-‘?RIF : ANALISIS SURAT AL-ANBIYA’: RHETORICAL LANGUAGE STYLE OF TAJ?HUL AL-‘?RIF: AN ANALYSIS IN SURAT AL-ANBIYA’ Hakiem, Marsekal Rahman
El-Jaudah : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): El-Jaudah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Arab
Publisher : Department of Arabic Education of State Collage for Islamic Studies of Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/ej.v4i1.1076

Abstract

?????? ?????: ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ???? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ????????? ????????. ??? ????? ?? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ??????. ???? ??????? ?????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ????? ????????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????. ?????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???? ???????? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ??????. ??? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ??? ????????? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????. ??? ??????? ????????? ?? ????? ???????? ?? ????? ???????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ???????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ???????. ?????? ??? ????? ?? : ??? ?? ???? ???????? 18 ???? ?????????? 5 ???? ???? ?? ??????? ????? ?????? ?13 ???? ???? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ?? ??? ?????? 15 ????? ???? ????? ??????. ???????? ???????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ???: ??????? ???? ???? ????? ???????? ??????? ???? ??????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ???? ??????? ???????? ???? ??????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ???? ??????.