Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND OTHERS
Harianja, Anjelina Septiana
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Social Critique in the Monologue 'Balada Sumarah' by Tentrem Lestari Harianja, Anjelina Septiana; Harahap, Nurhayati; Triana, Ade
International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others Vol 6 No 3 (2023): International Journal of Education, Information Technology  and Others
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10211812

Abstract

This research explores social criticism within Tentrem Lestari's monologue drama, "Baladah Sumarah," employing a qualitative descriptive research approach. Qualitative description, as defined by Moleong (cited in Achmad, 2023: 3), involves the generation of descriptive data in the form of words and images rather than numerical figures. The Qualitative Descriptive Method is employed to analyze the structural and aesthetic values embedded in the monologue. The findings of the study reveal three prominent social criticisms within the monologue, addressing issues related to poverty, criminal activities, and family dynamics. The research concludes that social criticism in literary works serves as a reflection of societal phenomena. In the context of "Baladah Sumarah," the monologue offers social criticism directed at leaders and individuals in positions of power who exhibit tendencies of arrogance toward the lower strata of society. This research contributes to the understanding of social criticism in literature, emphasizing its role as a mirror reflecting prevalent issues within the community. Furthermore, it highlights the effectiveness of qualitative descriptive methods in uncovering and analyzing the intricate layers of social critique present in dramatic literary works.
Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Dalam Menafsirkan Implikatur Percakapan Pada Teks Dialog Konteporer Dan Implikasinya Bagi Pembelajaran Pragmatik Harianja, Anjelina Septiana; Putrayasa, Ida Bagus; Alfin, Yunita Ratna; Dewi, Ni Putu Eva Fransiska; Susila, Luh Putu Adhi Laksmini; Suandi, I Nengah; Paramartha, I Ketut
JURNAL MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan
Publisher : Universitas Pakuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/jmp.v14i1.13495

Abstract

ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' ERRORS IN INTERPRETING CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY DIALOGUE TEXTS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR PRAGMATIC LEARNING Abstract. This study aims to identify and analyze in depth the types of errors made by Indonesian Language Education students in interpreting conversational implicatures in contemporary dialogues. Implicature, as an implied meaning arising from the violation of Grice's Cooperative Principle, is not merely a theoretical concept, but a crucial competency that determines the success of authentic communication and is a primary prerequisite for prospective effective language teachers. Using a qualitative descriptive method, data were collected through the Conversational Implicature Interpretation Test (T-IIP) taken by 60 sixth-semester students. This test, consisting of 20 authentic dialogue items from social media, films, and interviews, was designed not only to measure interpretation skills, but also students' ability to identify violated maxims and provide contextual justification for their interpretations. The results showed a significant level of interpretation errors, amounting to 48.75% of the total 1,200 responses. The most dominant type of error occurred in the interpretation of the Maxim of Quality (58.33%), especially in irony and sarcasm, followed by errors in the Maxim of Relevance (55.00%). The root of these errors lies in a lack of contextual awareness (socio-pragmatic awareness) and a shallow understanding of pragmatic inference processes. The implications of these findings serve as a strong call for a reformulation of pragmatics learning, emphasizing the need for a paradigm shift from decontextualized theoretical approaches to authentic case-based analysis that focuses on sociopragmatic contexts, integrating contemporary dialogue and cooperative learning models to enhance students' pragmatic awareness. Keywords: Error Analysis, Conversational Implicature, Grice's Cooperative Principle, Contemporary Dialogue, Pragmatic Learning
Co-Authors Alfin, Yunita Ratna Dewi, Ni Putu Eva Fransiska I Nengah Suandi Ida Bagus Putrayasa Nurhayati Harahap Paramartha, I Ketut Susila, Luh Putu Adhi Laksmini TRIANA, ADE