Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Ronaldi Agustinus
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
STUDI ANALISIS MENGENAI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA MELALUI UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF Ronaldi Agustinus; Yudi Kornelis; Diki Zukriadi
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 5 No. 6 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v5i6.4302

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peran Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) dalam menyelesaikan sengketa administrasi di Indonesia. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif, penelitian ini menjelaskan fenomena yang ada melalui analisis norma hukum yang relevan. Data dikumpulkan dari berbagai sumber hukum dan literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PTUN berperan penting dalam menyeimbangkan kekuasaan pemerintah dan hak-hak warga negara dengan memastikan transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pemerintahan. Sebelum membawa perkara ke PTUN, penggugat diwajibkan menempuh upaya administratif sesuai Pasal 48 UU No. 5 Tahun 1986, yang melibatkan keberatan dan banding terhadap keputusan tata usaha negara (KTUN). Jika prosedur administratif tidak dilalui, gugatan dianggap tidak dapat diterima. Penelitian ini juga menyoroti bahwa KTUN adalah keputusan konkret, individual, dan final yang memiliki konsekuensi hukum. Dengan demikian, PTUN merupakan instrumen penting dalam memperkuat demokrasi dan mencegah penyalahgunaan wewenang oleh pejabat negara.
Legality of Share Ownership Based on Nominee Agreements in Indonesian Law Ronaldi Agustinus; Diki Zukriadi
Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu Vol. 5 No. 08 (2025): Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, December (2025)
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal implications and validity of nominee arrangements in the ownership structure of limited liability companies in Indonesia, particularly in the context of restrictions on foreign investment. The research seeks to analyze the alignment between the practice of nominee shareholding and the principles of legality, justice, and legal certainty as upheld in Indonesian corporate and investment law. Employing a normative juridical approach, the study focuses on written legal norms, statutory regulations, and doctrinal analysis within the national legal system. The research data were obtained from secondary legal materials, including legislation, judicial decisions, scholarly writings, and relevant literature collected through systematic document review and library research. Data were analyzed using deductive reasoning and a descriptive-analytical technique to assess the coherence and consistency among the applicable legal norms. The findings reveal that nominee practices, although often justified under the principle of contractual freedom, in substance contradict the legal prohibition on indirect foreign ownership as stipulated in investment law. Such arrangements undermine the doctrine of good faith, distort the principle of limited liability, and create ambiguity in shareholder accountability. Consequently, nominee agreements are deemed legally flawed and contrary to public order because their intent conceals actual ownership and circumvents statutory limitations. The study concludes that reformulating corporate and investment regulations is essential to ensure transparency, uphold justice, and reinforce the rule of law in Indonesia’s investment environment.
Co-Authors Diki Zukriadi Yudi Kornelis