Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Jurnal Nusantara Mengabdi
Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Reformulation of Decision-making System in ASEAN Syofyan, Ahmad; Azizah, Siti; Akayleh, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al; Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah; Kusworo, Daffa Ladro
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4912

Abstract

ASEAN is a regional organization for Southeast Asia that was established on 8 August 1967 by five ASEAN countries at the time, namely Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines. Today, ASEAN has eleven members with Timor Leste as the youngest member. Like any other international organization, ASEAN has its own decision-making system. The decision-making system in ASEAN before the Charter was only consultation and consensus. That is, decision making based on the agreement of all members and can only be decided if no one refuses, this refers to the Bangkok Declaration. Meanwhile, after the establishment of the 2007 ASEAN Charter, there is a new decision-making system, namely ASEAN Minus-X. A decision-making system that does not rely on the approval of all its members, so that a policy can be decided even if only approved by a few members. This decision-making system can only be done in the economic field. From these two decision-making systems, there are several challenges that exist so that new ideas emerge to reformulate the decision-making system in ASEAN, which is considered relevant to the times and can accommodate all the interests of ASEAN members.
Peningkatan Pemahaman Masyarakat Pondok Pesantren Al Kirom Hajimena terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2019 tentang Pesantren Fakih, M.; Natamiharja, Rudi; Setiawan, Ikhsan; Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah
Jurnal Nusantara Mengabdi Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jnm.v3i3.3315

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to enhance the understanding of the Al Kirom Hajimena Islamic Boarding School community regarding the recently enacted Pesantren Law. Methodology: To achieve the objectives of this research, a multi-phase approach will be utilized, encompassing preliminary surveys, focus group discussions (FGDs), educational workshops, and post-intervention evaluations. Results: Following the implementation of Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and educational workshops, a notable improvement in legal understanding among participants was observed. The active participation in FGDs helped identify critical knowledge gaps, while the workshops provided in-depth explanations that addressed existing concerns and confusion. Limitations: This research is within the scope of national law. Contribution: Al Kirom Hajimena Islamic Boarding School.
Arbitrase Internasional: Evaluasi Efektivitasnya sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Natamiharja, Rudi; Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah; Setiawan, Ikhsan
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Januari
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v4i2.3297

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to determine the extent to which international arbitration is of interest to the parties and how international arbitration can become an adequate alternative settlement. Methodology: This paper is included in the normative research type. The author uses an Analytical Approach. The data collection method in this paper is a literature study. After collecting all the necessary data, the next step is identifying and classifying the data. This research uses a qualitative analysis method. The qualitative analysis method analyzes secondary data that has been obtained to develop hypotheses to answer the problems in this paper coherently and logically. Results: International Arbitration interests the parties due to the advantages of arbitration, one of which is its unlimited relative competence; whether international arbitration is compelling depends on the interests of the parties in the dispute and whether they are fulfilled. Limitations: This research is within the scope of international law. Contribution: This study contributes to understanding the strengths and weaknesses of international arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism and provides practical recommendations for strengthening domestic and international legal frameworks to enhance its effectiveness
Reformulation of Decision-making System in ASEAN Syofyan, Ahmad; Azizah, Siti; Akayleh, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al; Panjaitan, Oksha Dwi Anugrah; Kusworo, Daffa Ladro
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4912

Abstract

ASEAN is a regional organization for Southeast Asia that was established on 8 August 1967 by five ASEAN countries at the time, namely Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines. Today, ASEAN has eleven members with Timor Leste as the youngest member. Like any other international organization, ASEAN has its own decision-making system. The decision-making system in ASEAN before the Charter was only consultation and consensus. That is, decision making based on the agreement of all members and can only be decided if no one refuses, this refers to the Bangkok Declaration. Meanwhile, after the establishment of the 2007 ASEAN Charter, there is a new decision-making system, namely ASEAN Minus-X. A decision-making system that does not rely on the approval of all its members, so that a policy can be decided even if only approved by a few members. This decision-making system can only be done in the economic field. From these two decision-making systems, there are several challenges that exist so that new ideas emerge to reformulate the decision-making system in ASEAN, which is considered relevant to the times and can accommodate all the interests of ASEAN members.
Co-Authors Ahmad Syofyan Akayleh, Shaker Suleiman Ali Al Ikhsan Setiawan Kusworo, Daffa Ladro M. Fakih Natamiharja, Rudi Siti Azizah