Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.152
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Awang Long Law Review Law Development Journal Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Safira Widya Attidhira
Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Reformulation of Expert Qualifications in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System (A Comparative Study between Indonesia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia) Attidhira, Safira Widya
Law Development Journal Vol 6, No 1 (2024): March 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.6.1.53-63

Abstract

This research aims to compare the regulations regarding experts in advanced countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, to then be used as examples for reformulating expert standardization in Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical method using secondary data consisting of primary legal materials related to experts and secondary legal materials, such as international journals and books. The approach used in this research includes conceptual, legislative, and comparative approaches with other countries. The results of the study show that the United Kingdom has Civil Procedure Rules that extensively regulate the rights and obligations of experts, while the United States has the Federal Rules of Evidence, which also specifically regulate the qualification standards for experts. In Australia, regulations related to experts have been established in the Evidence Act 1995 and Federal Court Rules 2011, which often discuss the code of conduct for experts in court. This research concludes that Indonesia needs to adopt more detailed regulations regarding experts in the criminal justice system, starting with the creation of a code of conduct containing requirements to become an expert, the rights and obligations of experts, and the mechanism for the process of providing expert witness testimony. However, it is not sufficient to stop there; there must be encouragement from the authorities to ensure that this code of conduct is read and understood by prospective experts. Additionally, there should be standards for qualifications, experience, and the mechanism for providing testimony due to the lack of credibility and reliability of an expert presented in court.
REVIEW OF PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION LEGAL REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA Safira Widya Attidhira; Yana Sukma Permana
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (511.309 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i1.562

Abstract

The advancement of information and communication technology had caused an increase in data breaches and data misuse. The state is encouraged to have strong law regulations concerning the protection of personal data of its society. This research then aims to explain the lack of legal regulation in Indonesia regarding the protection of personal data. In analyzing the problem, this research used the juridical-normative method (legal research) by oriented on the law principles, law norms, and positive law in Indonesia which is relevant to the research’s topic. The conceptual approach was also used in this research because the researcher is more focused on the law regulation that had been issuance. Legal sources were then much used as research data, starting from the Indonesian Constitution to the draft regulation. This research shows that different from Malaysia and Singapore that are already have the Personal Data Protection Act, Indonesia does not yet have a comprehensive personal data protection law. This is because the protection and misuse of personal data in Indonesia are still regulated as sectoral or scattered in several regulations and acts. As a consequence, Indonesia does not have a clear reference for handling the data misuse cases that are happening. This research then gives some advice and recommendations to the government to pass the Draft Regulation on Personal Data Protection which has been discussed since 2016.
Fighting State Negligence: Class Action Lawsuits as an Instrument of Justice for Flood Victims (An Analysis of the Banjarmasin State Administrative Court Decision and its Relevance for West Java Flash Floods 2025) Attidhira, Safira Widya; Suparno
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (Mei - Juli 2025)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v3i2.388

Abstract

Class action lawsuits have become an important instrument in fighting for justice for victims of natural disasters in Indonesia, as seen in the 2021 South Kalimantan flash flood case. This study analyzes the effectiveness of class action lawsuits as a corrective justice mechanism under Law No. 24 of 2007 on Disaster Management by examining the Banjarmasin State Administrative Court Decision No. 6/PEN-HS/2021/1/PTUN.BJM and its relevance to the West Java 2025 flash flood. Through a juridical-normative approach with document analysis of court decisions, the research shows that although the lawsuit required significant resource mobilization and was unsuccessful in obtaining material compensation that should have been the right of victims according to Article 26 letter (d) of Law No. 24 of 2007, it proved effective in forcing disaster management policy reform. The South Kalimantan case led to the procurement of an early warning system worth IDR771.5 million and supporting infrastructure worth IDR2.2 billion. Comparative analysis identified similar patterns of institutional negligence in both disasters: unpreparedness of early warning systems, slow emergency response, and neglect of the impact of environmental damage due to land conversion. This research confirms that despite evidentiary challenges and bureaucratic resistance, class action lawsuits remain a vital instrument in promoting government accountability and structural reform in disaster management as mandated by Law No. 24/2007.
Legal Policy on Allocating Resources for Pertalite Subsidies: Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency Analysis Safira Widya Attidhira; Meni Apriani; Romadu Novelino; Jaka Tiwana Alfianda; Faisal Santiago
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2026): Jurnal pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v13i1.48866

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal and political efficiency of the 2024 Pertalite subsidy policy from a legal and economic perspective based on the Kaldor Hicks efficiency principle. The results show that the Pertalite subsidy policy has not fully achieved economic and legal efficiency, as reflected in the negative net social benefits ranging from IDR 8–18 trillion per year. This condition indicates that the resulting social benefits have not exceeded the social costs borne by the state and society. The observed inefficiency is mainly caused by inaccuracies in targeting subsidy recipients, limited data integration between institutions, and a suboptimal legal framework governing the protection and management of digital data in the subsidy distribution system. From a normative perspective, the Pertalite subsidy policy also requires further strengthening to be more aligned with the principles of efficient and fair economic resource management as mandated by Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Korupsi epistemik dalam praktik penegakan hukum indonesia: ketika sumber daya manusia mengkhianati semangat responsif regulasi Safira Widya Attidhira; Zainal Arifin Hoesein
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/cessie.v4i4.1960

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis fenomena korupsi epistemik dalam praktik penegakan hukum di Indonesia sebagai faktor utama yang menjelaskan kesenjangan antara regulasi hukum progresif pascareformasi 1998 dan praktik hukum yang masih formalistik serta represif. Menggunakan metode penelitian normatif-teoretis melalui telaah literatur akademik, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan konstruksi teoretis korupsi epistimik dalam praktik penegakan hukum, sekaligus menguraikan manifestasi utamanya. Selain itu, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi akar structural yang memungkinkan terjadinya korupsi epistimik dan merumuskan strategi konseptual untuk mengatasinya. Hasil penelitian menemukan tiga bentuk utama korupsi epistemik yaitu kesenjangan sadar antara pengetahuan dan tindakan, instrumentalisasi pengetahuan hukum untuk kepentingan pribadi, dan reproduksi kultur legalistik yang diperkuat oleh sistem pendidikan hukum yang kontradiktif, dominasi kultur legal formalism, dan ketiadaan mekanisme akuntabilitas epistemik. Kesimpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa reformasi hukum di Indonesia harus melampaui pembaruan regulatif menuju transformasi epistemologis dan kultural. Rekomendasi utama mencakup reformasi pendidikan hukum berbasis kebajikan intelektual (epistemic virtues), pengembangan mekanisme pengawasan epistemik, dan pembentukan kultur profesional yang menghargai progresivitas dan integritas pengetahuan hukum.  
Misuse of Police Escort Convoys: A Juridical Analysis of Viral Cases from the Perspective of Pancasila Social Justice and Public Trust Safira Widya Attidhira; Ade Saptomo
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (June - Au
Publisher : Greenation Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v3i2.493

Abstract

The misuse of police patrol and escort (patwal) services has become a viral phenomenon on Indonesian social media, with cases such as the RI-36 official vehicle (January 2025), Celeste Anastasia's use for a "nail appointment" (December 2024), and police escort vehicles disrupting ASEAN Summit delegations (September 2023), generating public concern and giving rise to the "No Viral, No Justice" phenomenon as a reflection of declining public trust in police institutions. This study aims to analyze the juridical aspects of police escort misuse, examine its impact on Pancasila social justice principles, and formulate preventive policy recommendations using normative legal methods with descriptive-analytical approaches through literature studies of Law No. 2/2002 on the Police, Law No. 22/2009 on Traffic and Road Transport, and Police Regulation No. 14/2011 on Police Code of Ethics. The research findings indicate that escort misuse violates Traffic Law Articles 134-137 regarding priority vehicles, police code of ethics, and potentially constitutes abuse of authority, while contradicting the second and fifth principles of Pancasila, resulting in decreased public trust and perceptions of unfair law enforcement. The study concludes that escort misuse constitutes a serious legal violation contrary to Pancasila values, necessitating regulatory reform through revision of Police Regulations with clear criteria, strengthened internal oversight, firm sanctions without favoritism, and reform commitment from police leadership to restore public trust.
Co-Authors Ade Saptomo Faisal Santiago Jaka Tiwana Alfianda Meni Apriani Romadu Novelino Suparno Yana Sukma Permana Zainal Arifin Hoesein