Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM WHISTLE BLOWER DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA Hasbi, Mhd.
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.1803

Abstract

One of the efforts made by the state in order to realize legal protection for every citizen is to carry out honest and fair law enforcement, including the state's efforts to and overcome the occurrence of criminal acts that can disrupt public security and public order. Current criminal law enforcement practices This is known as a new term, namely whitsle blower. Etymologically whitsle blower comes from the word whitsle which means "whistle" or "whistle sound", while blower means whistle blower or reporter, secret leaker, or whistleblower. The existence of the whitsle blower is very important in uncovering serious and organized criminal acts, especially crimes Corruption crimes have not received adequate legal protection. This can be seen from a number of cases of criminalization of whistleblowers by law enforcers. This research is normative research. research carried out by examining the literature using a statute approach. Regulation of whitsle blowers and justice collaborations in SEMA Number 04 of 2011. The role of whitsle blowers in Indonesia needs to continue to be encouraged and socialized, also implemented, both by government institutions, private companies and public institutions . Although the practice of protecting whitsle blowers is not without challenges, amidst the lack of protection for whitsle blowers in Indonesia, a whitsle blower can be threatened because of their reports or testimony regarding alleged violations and crimes that have occurred.
KELEMAHAN REGULASI TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU DALAM UPAYA MENCEGAH DAN MENANGGULANGI PRAKTIK POLITIK UANG (MONEY POLITIC) Hasbi, Mhd.; Ali , Tengku Mabar
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 02 (2024): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v5i02.611

Abstract

Pelaksanaan Pemilu yang bebas dan adil (free and fair) adalah suatu keniscayaan yang harus dilaksanakan bagi sebuah negara yang menyatakan diri sebagai negara yang demokrasi. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan adanya kebijakan hukum dalam upaya untuk mewujudkan pelaksanaan Pemilu yang bebas dan adil, utamanya untuk mengatasi berbagai pelanggaran yang terjadi dalam penyelenggaraan Pemilu. Regulasi tindak pidana Pemilu dan Sanksi tindak pidana dalam Undang-Undang Pemilu serta penegakan hukumnya dirasakan belum maksimal dan mampu mewujudkan pemilihan umum yang jujur dan adil. Penelitian ini bertujuan untu menganalisis kelemahan Undang-Undang Pemilu sehingga penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana Pemilu lebih berkepastian hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan paradigma yang digunakan paradigma konstruktifisme. Hasil pembahasan diperoleh bahwa Kelemahan regulasi tindak pidana saat ini, menunjukkan bahwa sistem sanksi pidana dalam pasal-pasal dalam Undang-Undang Pemilu dirumuskan dalam bentuk sanksi maksimal, yang dalam penerapannya tidak menimbulkan efek jera bagi pelaku dan memiliki daya guna sebagai pencegahan umum (general preventif) untuk mencegah terjadinya tindak pidana Pemilu. Secara kelembagaan, kedudukan Sentra Gakkumdu masih terdapat kekaburan norma dalam pelaksanaannya, sehingga fungsi dari Sentra Gakkumdu belum berjalan secara maksimal. Kemudian budaya hukum masyarakat, utamanya penegak hukum belum menunjukkan profesionalisme kerja, yang memiliki integritas dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya.
Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Suatu Putusan di Persidangan Perkara Pidana Lubis, Andi Hakim; Hasbi, Mhd.
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 1, No 12 (2024): Madani, Vol. 1 No. 12 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10441033

Abstract

One of the important aspects of a judge's decision in judicial power is the judge's consideration in giving the severity of a criminal sentence. The judge's consideration can be interpreted as an opinion about the good or bad of a matter in order to provide a decision or decision that is sentenced by a judge at the supreme court and judges at the lower judicial bodies as outlined by the judge in his decision. The judge's considerations are the thoughts or opinions of the judge in making a decision by looking at things that can lighten or burden the offender. Every judge is obliged to submit written considerations or opinions on the case being examined and becomes an integral part of the decision. The type of research used in this dissertation is normative research. The essence of the judge's own decision is the crown, and the peak of the criminal case so that the judge in giving a criminal decision must pay attention to all aspects. In the judge's consideration, there are 3 (three) aspects that the judge considers, namely juridical, philosophical and sociological aspects.
Special Protection For Whistleblowers In Disclosing Money Laundering In Indonesia Hasbi, Mhd.; Ansari, Ansari; Hamdani, Muhammad Faisal
SASI Volume 29 Issue 4, December 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v29i4.1533

Abstract

Introduction: A suspected criminal act of money laundering or a person who is designated as a witness in the process of examining a criminal act of laundering is obliged to obtain protection from the state. Purposes of the Research:  This paper aims to find out the criminal law aspects of reporting Money Laundering where in fact someone as a reporter usually turns into a suspect so that this paper gives the spirit and courage of the community as a reporter because it is protected by state law.Method Of The Research:  The type of research is normative juridical with analysis using legal documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Results of the Research : Reporting of suspected money laundering or a person who is designated as a witness in the process of investigating a laundering crime is mandatory to obtain protection from the state. The protection given to reporters and witnesses is given in two forms, namely legal protection and special protection.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN DALAM KASUS PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT DAN PEMALSUAN AKTA AUTENTIK DI KOTA MEDAN (Studi Putusan Praperadilan No.22/Pid.Pra/2025/PN Mdn) Hasbi, Mhd.; Azhary Lubis, Muhammad Dhobit; Sitompul, Ariman
Law Jurnal Vol 6, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v6i1.6762

Abstract

Tulisan ini menganalisis Putusan Praperadilan No. 22/Pid.Pra/2025/PN Mdn terkait dengan dugaan tindak pidana pemalsuan surat dan pemalsuan akta autentik yang terjadi di Kota Medan. Permohonan praperadilan ini diajukan untuk menguji keabsahan penetapan tersangka oleh penyidik terhadap pemohon. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan kasus. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa dalam perkara ini, hakim menilai penetapan tersangka tidak memenuhi standar minimal pembuktian awal sebagaimana disyaratkan dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 21/PUU-XII/2014. Putusan ini menegaskan kembali pentingnya prinsip due process of law dan perlindungan hak-hak tersangka dalam proses peradilan pidana
Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Perlindungan WHITSLE BLOWER Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Hasbi, Mhd.
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Agustus 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v3i4.1978

Abstract

Law enforcement against money laundering crimes currently refers to the provisions of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes (UU No. 8/2010 concerning PP-TPPU), which is the legal basis (umbrella law) for enforcers law in preventing and eradicating criminal acts of money laundering. Regarding reporting parties who are burdened with the obligation to report suspicious financial transactions to PPATK, this has been explicitly stipulated in the provisions of Article 17 of Law no. 8/2010 concerning PP-TPPU, where the parties consist of Financial Services Providers and Goods/Services Providers. There are inconsistencies in the formulation of the articles of Law no. 8/2010 concerning PP-TPPU and PP no. 43/2015 as an implementing regulation, will of course have implications for the legal certainty of protection for whistleblowers, which will have an impact on the implementation of reporting not being optimal and ultimately will also have an impact on efforts to prevent and eradicate money laundering crimes. This research is normative research. The research was carried out by researching the literature using a statute approach. The ideal regulation which is more legal and just, is to include several matters relating to whistleblowers in the Special Law on Whistleblowers or the revision of Law no. 31/2014 concerning PSK, namely: regarding information criteria, whistleblower rights, report substance, reporting system, technical protection and rewards for whistleblowers. Barriers to protection for whistleblowers of money laundering crimes, consisting of juridical factors and law enforcement factors . Juridical factors, protection of whistleblowers have not been clearly regulated in Law no. 31/2014 concerning prostitutes. Meanwhile, as a law enforcement factor, there are still differences in perception between law enforcers who are members of the criminal justice system and whistle blowers.
Gratification In Promotion In View Of The Law Hasbi, Mhd.
Legalpreneur Journal Volume 2, No. 1 October 2023
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lpj.v2i1.3721

Abstract

AbstractMany cases of corruption by state officials are increasingly systematic and widespread, one of which is the existence of gratification. Therefore, gratuity should have its own meaning inthe law if the definition or understanding of gratuity has not been included in the generalprovisions, it will be very likely that there will be ambiguity in the interpretation of thecriminal act of gratuity. In Article 12 B Of The Corruption Eradication Act No. 20 of 2001that a gift that is related to his position and contrary to his obligations or duties isconsidered an act that has an indication of gratuity. Legal norms in this article raises theambiguity of the norm (Vague Norm), the juridical indication that someone has done thecrime of gratuity is not clear, because the definition of gratuity itself is not written in thelegislation so that Article 12 B still needs to be touched to be seen clearly.Keywords: Legal, Law, Gratification
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM WHISTLE BLOWER DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA Hasbi, Mhd.
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.1803

Abstract

One of the efforts made by the state in order to realize legal protection for every citizen is to carry out honest and fair law enforcement, including the state's efforts to and overcome the occurrence of criminal acts that can disrupt public security and public order. Current criminal law enforcement practices This is known as a new term, namely whitsle blower. Etymologically whitsle blower comes from the word whitsle which means "whistle" or "whistle sound", while blower means whistle blower or reporter, secret leaker, or whistleblower. The existence of the whitsle blower is very important in uncovering serious and organized criminal acts, especially crimes Corruption crimes have not received adequate legal protection. This can be seen from a number of cases of criminalization of whistleblowers by law enforcers. This research is normative research. research carried out by examining the literature using a statute approach. Regulation of whitsle blowers and justice collaborations in SEMA Number 04 of 2011. The role of whitsle blowers in Indonesia needs to continue to be encouraged and socialized, also implemented, both by government institutions, private companies and public institutions . Although the practice of protecting whitsle blowers is not without challenges, amidst the lack of protection for whitsle blowers in Indonesia, a whitsle blower can be threatened because of their reports or testimony regarding alleged violations and crimes that have occurred.
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Untuk Pelapor dan Saksi Dalam Kejahatan Pencucian Uang Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum FIQH Hasbi, Mhd.; Dhobit Azhary Lubis, Muhammad
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i2.2361

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas perlindungan hukum bagi pelapor dan saksi dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang dari perspektif hukum positif dan hukum Islam (fiqh). Pencucian uang, yang melibatkan upaya untuk menyembunyikan asal-usul dana ilegal, memiliki dampak luas terhadap stabilitas ekonomi dan integritas sistem keuangan negara. Dalam proses penegakan hukum, pelapor dan saksi berperan penting dalam mengungkap jaringan kejahatan. Namun, mereka sering menghadapi risiko ancaman dan intimidasi yang menghambat keberanian mereka untuk memberikan informasi. Di Indonesia, Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban serta Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang mengatur berbagai mekanisme perlindungan bagi pelapor dan saksi, termasuk perlindungan fisik, identitas, dan dukungan hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan terkait serta prinsip-prinsip hukum Islam dalam perlindungan saksi dan pelapor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, meskipun regulasi telah menyediakan perlindungan yang memadai, terdapat tantangan dalam implementasinya, seperti keterbatasan sumber daya, kurangnya sosialisasi, dan rendahnya kesadaran masyarakat akan hak-hak pelapor dan saksi. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan optimalisasi peran LPSK agar lebih proaktif, pembaharuan dalam KUHAP untuk pengaturan perlindungan identitas, serta pemanfaatan teknologi dalam mendukung perlindungan saksi dan pelapor. Sinergi antara pendekatan hukum positif dan nilai-nilai hukum Islam yang menekankan keadilan diharapkan dapat menciptakan sistem perlindungan yang lebih efektif, aman, dan terpercaya dalam penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia.