Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Jurisprudentie Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Criminological Analysis of Banking Crimes in Makassar City Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng; Siddik, Andar
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Government Policy and Its Implementation to Maintain the Stability of the Nation
Publisher : Department of Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v6i2.49125

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the factors causing banking crime in Makassar City and the prevention efforts of the South Sulawesi Regional Police. Data was gathered from direct interviews with 20 respondents, including 10 investigators, 5 bank employees, and 5 victims of banking crime. The findings indicate that supervision, technological, economic, and opportunity factors are the main causes of banking crime in Makassar City. The police's preventive measures include legal counseling, patrols, routine supervision, community policing, and investigations. The research recommends revising the Banking Law to adapt to the banking industry's changes and challenges in the digital era. Additionally, improving police resources' quality and training in knowledge, skills, and integrity are crucial for future action.
ANALISIS KRIMINOLOGIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PELECEHAN SEKSUAL DI KOTA MAKASSAR (Studi Kasus di Polrestabes Makassar): Case Study at Makassar Police Station Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng; Arya, Andi
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 11 No 2 (2024): Volume 11 Nomor 2 Desember 2024
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v11i2.53917

Abstract

This research moves from the anxiety over the rampant cases of sexual harassment in the city of Makassar, so the author is interested in further researching and analyzing the factors that cause criminal acts of sexual harassment in Makassar City, as well as seeing the efforts made by the Makassar Police in preventing and overcoming these criminal acts. This research uses empirical legal research method, which aims to observe and analyze the implementation of law in society. The results showed an increase in sexual harassment cases from year to year, namely in 2020, 2021, and 2022. The factors that cause sexual harassment involve internal and external factors. In an effort to prevent and overcome sexual harassment in the family, there are two approaches. First, through non-punitive countermeasures, involving pre-emptive and preventive measures that must be taken by individuals, communities, and the police. Second, through penal countermeasures, which include repressive measures taken by law enforcement officials such as the police, prosecutors, courts, and correctional institutions
Bunting Lolo: The Dialectics of State, Islamic Law, and Culture in Marriage Practice among Island Communities in South Sulawesi Abd. Kadir Ahmad; Sabara; Arafah, Sitti; Muhamamd Nur; Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng
AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i2.10399

Abstract

This study intends to explore the socio-cultural construction of island communities in South Sulawesi that fosters the tradition of bunting lolo (child marriage), including the influencing factors and its dialectic with the state and Islamic law. A critical ethnographic method was adopted with the island communities as the research subject, while the culture and practice of bunting lolo constitute the units of analysis. Data were collected from the communities of Kodingareng (Makassar City) and Badi (Pangkajene Islands Regency) island, both part of the Spermonde Islands. The result showed that the practice of bunting lolo has become a tradition based on social, cultural, economic, and religious constructs. In the contemporary context, bunting lolo is a solution to 'balerek' or promiscuity among adolescents, both boys and girls. This practice conflicts with the minimum marriage age regulation of 19 years stated in Marriage Law No. 16 of 2019. Consequently, bunting lolo manifests the dialectic between state, Islamic law, and local culture in marriage practices within the island communities in which state regulation is found to be less considered than the other two.
When Punishment Becomes Political Currency : The Penological Theater of the Tom Lembong Case Zul Khaidir Kadir; Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i3.225

Abstract

In its ideal form, punishment is conceived as a rational and proportionate response to moral wrongdoing, grounded in demonstrable harm and clear culpability. Classical penological theories emphasize the principles of retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation, all of which presume the presence of intent and injury. However, in the case of Tom Lembong, punishment was imposed absent any proven crime, malicious intent, or measurable harm. Instead, it became a symbolic act, reconfigured as a performance of political theater to assert and preserve a sovereign narrative. This article advances two interrelated aims. First, it analyzes how the penalization of Tom Lembong reflects a wider pattern wherein legal institutions are repurposed to perform sovereignty and construct legitimacy through public spectacle. Second, it critiques the inadequacy of classical penological frameworks when punishment operates without moral fault or corrective intent. Using a qualitative research method and conceptual approach, this study draws upon library-based data sources, critically engaging with theoretical literature on penology, sovereignty, and post-truth politics. Data analysis was conducted descriptively, allowing conceptual mapping between legal practices and political narratives. The findings indicate that the punishment in this case functioned less as an instrument of legal redress than as political choreography. It transformed into symbolic currency designed to enforce narrative conformity and signal power consolidation. In such contexts, punishment serves not as a corrective measure but as a performative mechanism, signaling the dominance of a political order over competing interpretations of truth. This rupture in classical penological logic calls for a post-penological framework—one that accounts for punishment as a tool of narrative enforcement and symbolic governance within post-truth legal orders. Such a framework recognizes the transformation of legal acts into staged political performances, where the appearance of justice supersedes substantive fairness.
Tanpa Kontrak, Tetap Korupsi: Menimbang Ulang Batas Doktrin dan Pembuktian Hukum Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng; Zul Khaidir Kadir
SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 8 No 01 (2025): SUPREMASI : Jurnal Hukum 2025
Publisher : Universitas Sahid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia masih sangat bergantung pada keberadaan dokumen kontraktual dan bukti administratif formal. Padahal, dalam banyak kasus, praktik korupsi berlangsung secara informal melalui komunikasi terselubung dan relasi kuasa yang tidak tercatat secara hukum. Artikel ini bertujuan menyusun kerangka doktrinal yang menjelaskan batas hukum dalam pembuktian korupsi non-kontraktual serta membandingkannya dengan pendekatan hukum di negara lain. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perbandingan hukum. Data dikaji melalui analisis yuridis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan studi komparatif dari sistem hukum di Amerika Serikat, Inggris, Prancis, Jerman, hingga Brasil. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa sistem hukum Indonesia masih menyisakan celah dalam menjerat tindakan korupsi yang tidak terekam dalam bentuk perjanjian formal. Negara-negara lain telah mengembangkan model pembuktian berbasis kesengajaan, kekayaan yang tidak sah, dan indikator relasional yang tidak berdasarkan kontrak. Artikel ini merekomendasikan pembaruan doktrin pembuktian korupsi di Indonesia melalui pengakuan atas bukti tidak langsung, relasi kekuasaan, serta pola penguasaan aset yang tidak wajar, guna menyesuaikan dengan kompleksitas korupsi modern.
The Lack of Authority in Determining State Losses: A Legal Anomaly in Corruption Cases Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng; Zul Khaidir Kadir
Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Widya Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37631/widyapranata.v8i1.2043

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal problems of determining state losses in corruption cases in Indonesia, especially regarding the unclear institution that is legally authorized to determine it. This study was conducted using normative research with a statute approach. The results of the study indicate that there is no explicit norm that establishes the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) as the sole institution authorized to determine state losses in criminal cases. This opens up space for investigators and prosecutors to use internal estimates or audits from non-constitutional institutions, which raises the potential for excessive criminalization, inter-institutional conflict, and legal uncertainty. This study recommends harmonization of legislation that integrates BPK investigative audits as the main evidence in corruption criminal proceedings and encourages the reconstruction of inter-institutional procedures to ensure the principle of due process and legal justice.
Co-Authors Abd. Kadir Ahmad Arafah, Sitti Arya, Andi Muhamamd Nur Sabara Siddik, Andar Zul Khaidir Kadir