Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.944
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jambura Law Review Pusaka : Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) CASHFLOW : CURRENT ADVANCED RESEARCH ON SHARIA FINANCE AND ECONOMIC WORLDWIDE Jurnal El-Thawalib Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Priviet Social Sciences Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora dan Seni Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Sains Student Research JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Padamu Negeri Referendum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi International Journal of Law Analytic Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal El-Thawalib Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SciNusa: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Zul Khaidir Kadir
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 49 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 49 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Honor Killing dan Modernisasi Hukum Pidana di Berbagai Negara Muslim Kadir, Zul Khaidir
PUSAKA Vol 5 No 2 (2017): Pusaka Jurnal Khazanah Keagamaan
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (280.954 KB) | DOI: 10.31969/pusaka.v5i2.184

Abstract

Salah satu karakteristik negara demokratis adalah kesamaan semua orang di depan hukum. Namun, di negara-negara dimana pembunuhan karena kehormatan (honour killing) masih dipraktikkan oleh masyarakat, persamaan tidak selalu berlaku. Hal ini terutama terjadi di kalangan keluarga yang menganut sistem bahwa wanita berada di bawah kendali laki-laki. Honour killing yang merupakan praktik yang diberlakukan terhadap anggota keluarga yang melanggar kebiasaan adat yang berlaku, ditemukan di banyak negara, termasuk negara-negara Muslim. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat perlakuan hukum pidana terhadap pembunuhan karena kehormatan di berbagai negara Muslim. Penelitian ini menemukan perlakuan pembunuhan kehormatan bervariasi di berbagai negara Muslim dengan hukum pidana yang berbeda-beda. Indonesia misalnya, tidak mengatur pembunuhan karena kehormatan dalam pasal-pasalnya, namun memberi wewenang kepada hakim untuk mempertimbangkan dalam putusannya nilai-nilai yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Sementara di negara-negara muslim lainnya terdapat di antaranya yang memberikan hukuman berat sebagai efek jera terhadap pelaku dan ada pula yang mengatur dalam KUHP dengan menjadikannya alasan untuk meringankan hukuman.
Retributivisme Kultural: Eksplorasi Fenomena Pembunuhan Demi Kehormatan (Honor Killing) dalam Lensa Teori Kriminologi Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 11 No 4 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Honor killing is a culture-based killing carried out under the pretext of maintaining family honor, rooted in patriarchal norms and traditional values that prioritize family honor over individual rights and freedoms. This phenomenon is supported by a broader cultural and social system, although it is still legally considered a forbidden murder. This study uses qualitative methods to understand social phenomena and human behavior, with a conceptual approach and data collection through literature studies. The findings of the study suggest that honor killing can be seen as a form of cultural retribution, where killing is used as a symbolic response to the loss of family honor. Relevant criminological theories to explain honor killing include the theory of cultural transmission, the theory of cultural conflict, as well as several bio-criminological theories such as the theory of sexual selection, the theory of paternity certainty, and the theory of maladaptive killing.
Reinterpretasi Teori Lombroso dalam Konteks Hukum Pidana Modern: Kapan Born Criminal Menjadi Insanity Defense? Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 2024: (Special Isu) September-Oktober
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The born criminal theory, rooted in biological determinism, explains that criminality is the result of genetically inherited traits that can be recognized through distinctive physical characteristics, indicating an evolutionary regression to a primitive stage of humankind. On the other hand, the insanity defense is a criminal law doctrine that states that individuals who suffer from mental disorders at the time of committing a crime cannot be held accountable because it eliminates the evil mental attitude. Although Lombroso's theory emphasized that criminals are innately predisposed to crime due to uncontrollable biological factors, this concept has rarely been explored within the insanity defense framework. This study used qualitative research methods. Qualitative research is research to understand social phenomena and human behavior by processing descriptive data. This research was conducted using a conceptual approach. The data collection method was collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. Research findings show that meeting point between Lombroso's born criminal theory and the concept of insanity defense in modern criminal law lies in the recognition that biological factors can influence a person's criminal behavior, albeit with a more scientific and comprehensive understanding today. However, unlike Lombroso's view that ignores free will, modern law views that these biological influences do not completely determine a person's behavior, but must be evaluated individually in the context of the defendant's mental capacity at the time of the crime.
Dari Dualisme ke Monisme: Transformasi Konsep Mens Rea dalam Kodifikasi KUHP di Negara-Negara Poskolonial Zul Khaidir Kadir
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 2024: (Special Isu) September-Oktober
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Postcolonial countries, including Indonesia, inherited criminal law imported from colonial powers, which in many schemes reflects a dualistic view of crime. In the dualistic approach, mens rea is seen as a separate element and needs to be evaluated separately from actus reus. However, in many countries that experienced colonialism, there was a tendency to abandon the concepts of man in strict conditions and move to a more monistic approach. This study uses a normative research method with a comparative approach. The data collection method was collected using literature studies (library research), then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study indicate that countries that inherited colonial legal systems tend to face a dilemma between maintaining a more idealistic dualism or adopting a more practical monism in dealing with increasingly varied crimes. This flexible and adaptive approach allows the criminal law system to achieve a balance between substantive justice and legal certainty, while ensuring that individual rights are respected in the law enforcement process.
Relevansi Bukti vs Probative Value: Sebuah Dilema dalam Hukum Pembuktian Zul Khaidir Kadir
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): November: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i6.556

Abstract

Probative value refers to the extent to which the evidence provided is able to prove the facts being disputed. Evidence may be relevant in the sense that it relates to the case at hand, but relevance alone does not guarantee that the evidence will be well received or considered to have a significant influence. This study uses a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. The data collection method was collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that the process of proof in criminal law plays a central role in upholding substantive justice. Evidence not only functions as a mechanism to test the truth of claims or accusations brought in court, but also as a tool to protect the human rights of the accused by ensuring that everyone is considered innocent until proven otherwise. Failure to assess probative value can lead to serious injustice in the form of wrongful conviction or wrongful acquittal. To address this problem, it is necessary to increase technical literacy among legal practitioners, as well as the application of more careful procedures in testing the validity and reliability of evidence.
Menulis Ulang Keadilan: Bagaimana Doktrin Suppression of Evidence dalam Preseden Amerika Serikat Menata Kembali Prosedur Peradilan Pidana Kadir, Zul Khaidir
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Oktober: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/jaksa.v2i4.2099

Abstract

Suppression of evidence is one mechanism to ensure that law enforcement actions that violate constitutional rights will not produce evidence that can be used in court. Unfortunately, this doctrine is valued for its ability to ensure that the law enforcement process is carried out in accordance with applicable legal rules, as well as maintaining a balance between state power and individual freedom. On the other hand, the application of this doctrine can acquit perpetrators of crimes suspected of committing substantial crimes only because of minor procedural errors made by law enforcement. This study uses a data collection method collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study indicate that the doctrine of suppression of evidence has proven to be an important mechanism in maintaining a balance between individual constitutional rights and the state's need to enforce the law effectively. In the United States, the exclusionary rule and its various exceptions serve as a barrier to abuse of power by the state and law enforcement, especially in the context of unauthorized searches and seizures. Although it raises concerns that the criminal justice system is becoming less effective, this doctrine remains important in protecting individual constitutional rights in the United States.
Psychoanalytic and Crime: Is Freud's Theory Still Applicable in Criminological Research? Kadir, Zul Khaidir
Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15, No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jmk.v15i2.27081

Abstract

Freud's psychoanalysis emphasizes that human behavior, including criminal behavior, is driven by unconscious conflicts that arise from the dynamics between the three main components of personality, namely the id, ego, and superego. Since its introduction in the early 20th century, the relevance of this theory has begun to be questioned along with the development of modern criminology. One of the main reasons why Freud's psychoanalytic theory began to face challenges is because of the increasingly clear gap between the individualistic approach faced with the need to explain more complex crime phenomena in the modern era. This study uses a data collection method collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study indicate that Freud's psychoanalytic theory still has relevance in criminology, especially in understanding the deep psychological motivations behind certain criminal behavior. However, to understand the criminal phenomenon as a whole, integration between psychoanalysis and contemporary criminological theories is needed. This approach would make it possible to combine the understanding of individual psychological motivations offered by psychoanalysis with external factors such as social and economic pressures explained by other theories.
Perkembangan Pemikiran Neo-Lombrosian : Sebuah Tinjauan Teoretis terhadap Determinisme Biologis dalam Kriminologi Zul Khaidir Kadir
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i1.843

Abstract

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, despite the decline of classical biological theory, the idea that biological factors play a role in criminal behavior has again gained attention, especially with the emergence of new fields of study such as neurocriminology and behavioral genetics. This approach, often referred to as Neo-Lombrosianism, updates the old biological theory by integrating new findings from modern science. Unfortunately, while the findings of genetics and neurobiology offer a new landscape for searching for the causes of crime, they risk ignoring the important role of social factors such as poverty, opportunity, social processes, trauma, and structural injustice. This study used a data collection method collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study indicate that Neo-Lombrosianism has made a significant contribution to the understanding of the relationship between biological factors and criminal behavior, this approach must be balanced with a full awareness of the importance of social, economic, and environmental factors in influencing human behavior. However, there is a great risk that genetic findings can be used to support unfair policies, especially if biological factors are considered to be the main determinants of criminal behavior.
Menggugat Netralitas Hukum Pidana: Perdebatan Ideologis di Balik Kebijakan Kriminal di Negara-Negara Liberal Zul Khaidir Kadir
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): November : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v2i4.1546

Abstract

A number of liberal countries, such as the United States, England, Germany, and Sweden, have legal systems that claim to uphold the principles of democracy and human rights. However, in practice, there are more complex political dynamics. Behind the seemingly neutral codification of criminal law, there are ideological influences that are often invisible to the naked eye. This study uses a normative legal research method with a comparative approach. Data collection was collected using library research, then analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that from the analysis of criminal policy in the United States, England, Germany, and Sweden, it is clear that criminal law not only functions as a mechanism for enforcing justice, but also as an instrument that reflects and responds to political and social dynamics in each country. Although each country has a different context and approach, there are common patterns that can be seen in criminal policy in these countries. Criminal law not only functions to uphold justice objectively, but also becomes an arena where political ideology, public fears, and social challenges meet and shape policies that ultimately affect the lives of millions of people.
Memecah Siklus Kematian Keluarga : Analisis Kebijakan Kriminal Jepang terhadap Familicide di Masyarakat Urban Zul Khaidir Kadir
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Februari : KONSENSUS : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v2i1.603

Abstract

Familicide or murder of a nuclear family member. Urbanization in Japan has exacerbated the risk of familicide by changing patterns of social interaction and increasing life stress. Unfortunately, Japan's criminal policy still has weaknesses in detecting and preventing familicide. This study aims to explore the phenomenon of familicide in urban Japanese society through a critical analysis of existing criminal policies. This study uses a qualitative research method with a conceptual approach. The data collection method was collected using library research, then analyzed using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. The results of the study show that although the crime rate in Japan is relatively low, familicide remains a crucial issue that reveals fundamental weaknesses in the country's criminal policy. The legal approach that emphasizes post-incident responses, without being supported by adequate early prevention mechanisms, indicates an urgent need to reform the policy. Reforms must include proactive efforts to detect potential risks and implement coordinated interventions to prevent violence.
Co-Authors Ahmad, Abd. Kadir Kadir, Nadiah Khaeriah Mappaselleng, Nur Fadhilah Mochammad, Fadhil Hayan Muhammad Basri Muhni, Afif Normiati, Normiati Nur Fadhilah Mappaselleng Zulfikar, Muhammad Reza