Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penyelesaian Hutang Piutang Ditinjau Dari Putusan Hakim Dan Akibat Hukumnya (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2238 K/PDT/2020) Putri, Arkianti Anindita; Kristoffel, Chesario Own; Ratnadewanti, Dewi; Khaerunisa, Kamila; Alam, Nadia Rastika Alam; Siswajanthy, Farahdinny
Jurnal Hukum Malahayati Vol 4, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Malayati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Manusia sebagai makhluk sosial, selalu menimbulkan hubungan hukum. Dikarenakan masih banyaknya kesenjangan ekonomi, menimbulkan maraknya perjanjian hutang piutang. Tidak sedikit dalam prosesnya terjadi wanprestasi yang merugikan pihak kreditur. Maka, jaminan pun sangat penting dalam perjanjian hutang piutang ini. Seperti kasus dengan no perkara 2238 K/PDT/2020, Suryanto meminjamkan uang kepada Sukardi. Diberikan Jaminan cek, yang ternyata cek kosong, dan mengakibatkan perjanjian ini wanprestasi. Dalam tulisan ini akan dibahas penyelesaian perkara wanprestasi ditempuh melalui jalur litigasi. Pada karya ilmiah ini dipergunakan  penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi kasus, yang mana hasil akhir dari penelitian ini akan ditonjolkan proses dan tahapannya. Metode yang kami terapkan juga tentunya mengkaji setiap dokumen dokumen dan buku yang sesuai dan tentunya bersinggungan atau berkaitan mengenai perkara yang akan di teliti. Selain itu, metode yang di gunakan juga memakai metode atau konsep empiris, artinya tahapannya menggunakan proses focus group discussion (FGD). Kata Kunci : Makhluk sosial, perjanjian hutang piutang, wanprestasi, jaminan
Analysis of the Explosion of the Pertamina Plumpang Depo in Review From Government Regulation No. 14 of 2015 Concerning the National Development Master Plan Khaerunisa, Kamila; Ratnadewanti, Dewi; Alvandi, Agung; Hotimah, Husnul; Antoni, Herli
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25273/ay.v3i1.16398

Abstract

At present, industrial progress has been very rapid in various parts of the world, not to be missed in Indonesia. One of the industries engaged in Indonesia is oil and gas which is held by PT. Pertamina. The Pertamina Plumpang depot, where the oil is stored, has experienced two fires, first in January 2009 and also in March 2023 which spread to residents' settlements. The problem that was revealed after the plummpang incident was that the government could judge that the issuance of a building permit (IMB) was not the right decision, moreover the settlement is very close to the Pertamina depot which is at risk of fire hazard. This paper aims to provide an understanding of how this can happen and who will be responsible in this casebased on Government Regulation number 14 of 2015 concerning the National Development Master Plan. This paper was prepared based on a descriptive qualitative research method, with a case study approach. It can be concluded that the second explosion of the Plummpang depot which caused many victims of residents was due to the finding of an inaccurate IMB grant