Rezni, Vebiana Anugrah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Kurikulum Sejarah di Indonesia dan Kurikulum Australia pada Tingkat Menegah Pertama Rezni, Vebiana Anugrah; Yusuf, Syafruddin; Pamulaan, Alif Bahtiar
Sukma: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Sukma Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32533/08102.2024

Abstract

This research is a qualitative literature study research with a comparative method. The method used in this research uses the comparative research model from Bereday to present and analyze this research data. Testing the validity of the data was carried out by source triangulation which was carried out by analyzing various literature sources. The purpose of writing this article is to compare the history curriculum developed in Indonesia with that in Australia. The analysis focused on curriculum elements, materials and assessments from the two countries, namely Indonesia and Australia. The results of the analysis show that there are differences between the Indonesian and Australian history curricula, namely in terms of elements, materials and assessment. Indonesia emphasizes the formation of historical awareness and national identity, while Australia places more emphasis on developing interest, understanding and historical inquiry skills. The Indonesian system emphasizes concept and process skills, while Australia has material that is more integrated between knowledge and understanding and skills. On the evaluation side, Indonesia gives freedom to educational units, while Australia uses various types of tests. Although different in approach, both share a common focus on developing a deep understanding of history and analytical skills in students
Perbandingan Kurikulum Sejarah di Indonesia dan Kurikulum Australia pada Tingkat Menegah Pertama Rezni, Vebiana Anugrah; Yusuf, Syafruddin; Pamulaan, Alif Bahtiar
SUKMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Sukma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32533/08102.2024

Abstract

This research is a qualitative literature study research with a comparative method. The method used in this research uses the comparative research model from Bereday to present and analyze this research data. Testing the validity of the data was carried out by source triangulation which was carried out by analyzing various literature sources. The purpose of writing this article is to compare the history curriculum developed in Indonesia with that in Australia. The analysis focused on curriculum elements, materials and assessments from the two countries, namely Indonesia and Australia. The results of the analysis show that there are differences between the Indonesian and Australian history curricula, namely in terms of elements, materials and assessment. Indonesia emphasizes the formation of historical awareness and national identity, while Australia places more emphasis on developing interest, understanding and historical inquiry skills. The Indonesian system emphasizes concept and process skills, while Australia has material that is more integrated between knowledge and understanding and skills. On the evaluation side, Indonesia gives freedom to educational units, while Australia uses various types of tests. Although different in approach, both share a common focus on developing a deep understanding of history and analytical skills in students
Sejarah Perkembangan Marga Pangkalan Balai Tahun 1950-1984 Rezni, Vebiana Anugrah; Irwanto, Dedi
Jurnal Pattingalloang Vol. 12, No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/pattingalloang.v12i3.74747

Abstract

This study aims to examine the development of the Pangkalan Balai clan during the Old Order and New Order, and to analyze the impact of the elimination of the clan system on the local community. The method used is historiography with a multidisciplinary approach from social sciences, including politics, economics, sociology, and anthropology. The research findings show that during the Old Order, the Pangkalan Balai clan was led by Pasirah who had legal legitimacy and implemented an organized customary government system. The clan's economy developed independently through various sources of income, while socio-cultural traditions, such as Ande-Ande Panjang and Timbang Kepala Kebo, reflected the values of togetherness of the Malay community. During the New Order, although the clan was still recognized, there were adjustments in the implementation of clan rights and changes in the procedures for electing Pasirah and its apparatus. The community's economy continued with government support in the fields of agriculture and plantations, which helped increase crop yields. On the socio-cultural side, despite the pressure to adapt to modernization, the community remained committed to preserving their traditions and cultural values. However, the abolition of the clan system in 1983 resulted in the loss of customary rights and the transfer of land management to the village government, as well as eliminating the role of Pasirah and clan apparatus in government. Although the formal structure was abolished, socio-cultural values and traditions are still maintained to this day.