Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Layanan Aborsi Aman Bagi Korban Perkosaan : Tinjauan Viktimologi dan Tujuan Pemidanaan Satriawan, Bagas; Putri, Nella Sumika; Handayani, Irawati
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i2.7782

Abstract

Pasal 463 ayat (2) KUHP 2023 memberikan pengecualian terhadap larangan aborsi bagi korban perkosaan dengan batas usia kehamilan 14 minggu. Secara normatif, ketentuan tersebut dianggap sebagai langkah progresif karena mengakui hak korban untuk memperoleh layanan aborsi aman. Namun dalam praktiknya, pelaksanaan pasal tersebut masih belum dilakukan secara semestinya. Korban sering dihadapkan dalam hambatan yang membuat mereka mendapatkan viktimisasi sekunder dalam pelaksaanaan prosesnya, selain itu batas waktu 14 minggu juga berpotensi menjadikan korban yang ingin menggugurkan kandungannya menjadi dikriminalisasi apabila telah melewati batas waktu tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis yuridis normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, jurnal dan artikel. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun secara normatif Pasal 463 ayat (2) memberikan ruang yang sah bagi korban perkosaan, dalam pelaksanaan masih terdapat hambatan yang menyebabkan korban mengalami viktimisasi sekunder dari institusi penegakan hukum. Selain itu korban yang melebihi batas waktu 14 minggu sangat berpotensi dikriminalisasi sebagai pelaku tindak aborsi, hal ini menimbulkan beban psikologis yang lebih berat kepada korban dan juga perlakuan seperti ini tidak sesuai dengan teori gabungan pemidanaan dan teori kriminologi. Oleh karena itu untuk mewujudkan pelaksanaan pasal 463 ayat (2) KUHP 2023 secara semestinya diperlukan peninjauan kembali terkait aturan pelaksana, sinkronisasi aturan antar-lembaga penegak hukum, menunjuk fasilitas kesehatan yang berwenang menangani kasus aborsi korban perkosaan serta penerapan pendekatan berbasis hak asasi manusia agar perlindungan terhadap korban perkosaan benar-benar dapat terwujud.
The Challenges of Environmental Protection in Outer Space Following Russia’s Anti-Satellite (ASAT) Weapon Test Activities Claudya, Ribqha; Handayani, Irawati
Yustisia Vol 13, No 2: August 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v13i2.83749

Abstract

One of the effects of space activities is the creation of space debris that can endanger either the space environment or the Earth’s environment. In response to concerns regarding a swift escalation in space debris, Russia tested its Anti-Satellite (ASAT) Weapon by deploying the PL-19 Nudol missile against its satellite, Cosmos 1408, generating space debris. This situation certainly raises the question of how to protect the environment in space and whether international environmental law that provides a legal framework for protection in the world can also be applied in outer space. This article offers a new perspective on implementing international law to protect the space environment. This study adopts  normative  juridical  research  methods  by  utilizing  a statute and case approach to analyze the research.  The analysis showed that space debris generated from ASAT Weapon testing activities by Russia is regarded as harmful contamination under Article IX of OST under the interpretation of the term through the method of interpretation regulated in the 1969 VCLT because these activities produce long-lived space debris. Further, Russia violated the principles of environmental protection in space by failing to fulfill the obligations contained in these principles, such as taking precautionary measures and international consultations before carrying out such test activities.
JUSTICIABILITY OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ITS FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA Handayani, Irawati
Yustisia Vol 7, No 3: December 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i3.24782

Abstract

Economic, social, and cultural rights are categorized as second generation of rights in the concept of international human rights law. Due to its distinction with first generation right, which is civil and political right, it leads to the differentiation of justiciability of second generation rights. It’s quite often that the fulfillment of economic, social, and cultural rights is postponed, while on the contrary civil and political rights have to be accomplished immediately. The query of justiciability of economic, social, and cultural rights rottenly links with the responsibility of state parties on implementing the rights enumerated in ICCPR or ICESCR. Referring to Article 2 of ICESCR, the implementation of rights stated in ICESCR could be in progressive manner and usually this article is used as an example to not fulfill the right immediately. This article will elaborate further the implementation of protection of economic, social, and cultural rights in another country particularly in South Africa and compare it with Indonesia in order to achieve an ideal form of justiciability of this second generation of rights.
Cyber-Attack in Estonia: a New Challenge in The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law Zahra, Iradhati; Handayani, Irawati; Christianti, Diajeng Wulan
Yustisia Vol 10, No 1: April 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v10i1.48336

Abstract

This article aimed to analyze the classification of armed conflict in Estonia's cyber-attack and how the existing IHL are answering this problem, and whether those regulations are enough for future cases of cyber-attack. This article uses the normative method by comparing the Geneva Convention 1949 and Additional Protocol I 1977 with Rule 30 Tallinn Manual 1.0 and some relevant literary works, using a descriptive-analytic to explain the object comprehensively. The result shows that Estonia's cyber-attack could be classified as an International Armed Conflict, which first started as a Non-International Armed Conflict by proving attribution from Russia to Nashi Youth Group following the Overall Control in Tadic Case. The distinction between information warfare and cyber-attack is related to the physical impact, which a threshold of a cyber-attack under Tallinn Manual 1.0. It means Rule 30 of Tallinn Manual 1.0 also answered Jus ad Bellum's threshold and Jus in Bello in terms of cyber-attack. Although, this article needs some improvements regarding the limitation of this issue only focused on the Material Scope of IHL. In addition, Rule 30 of Tallinn Manual 1.0 is not legally binding because it is not one source of international law. However, it is possible for the Rule 30 Tallinn Manual 1.0 to be a new norm and becoming customary international law in the future.