Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Protection And Legal Responsibility For BPJS Patient Medical Records In The Perspective Of Legal Certainty Setya, Clarita Ayu Putri; Kholib, Abdul; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Jurnal Ekonomi Teknologi dan Bisnis (JETBIS) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): JETBIS : Journal Of Economics, Technology and Business
Publisher : Al-Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/jetbis.v3i3.94

Abstract

Medical records as a record are the responsibility and obligation of every medical and health worker to keep the health data of the patients they handle confidential. However, in 2021 there was a data leak from BPJS Health membership patients, where there were 279 million records of BPJS Health patient personal data information spread and traded on Raid Forums. Then it happened again in early 2022. This research aims to analyze and describe the protection and legal responsibility for the medical records of patients of the Social Security Organizing Agency in the perspective of legal certainty and to analyze and describe the implementation of the regulation of patient medical records of the Social Security Organizing Agency based on applicable provisions. This research uses empirical normative legal methods (Socio-Legal). The results of the study show that the implementation of the regulation of medical records of patients of the Social Security organizing agency is technically carried out on the basis of the Minister of Health Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning Medical Records. In the regulation, there are conditions that are difficult to distinguish related to the responsibility of the Ministry of Health and the relevant hospitals. The researcher concludes that the policy of protection and legal responsibility for the medical records of patients of the Social Security organizing body in the perspective of legal certainty is currently not fully realized.
Tanggung Jawab Apotek Dalam Kasus Kesalahan Penyerahan Obat Novianti, Novianti; Kholib, Abdul
JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v9i3.2350

Abstract

Responsibility iniactivity toipharmacy apothecaryik is peifor meiguaranteeimy serviceitell meigood for patientin. Keierror in peinewirahan medicine can beibad impact on the patientin and meineed to be responsibleirdata oleih theiservice dragon toiwithito loseirta oninewihe field service toiwithihatan (apoteik) who biinvolved. MeiDeathsi which is used in peiit isilitian this is deijust meiuse meiDeathsi juridical normative deijustiatilaw and concessioniptual that beirsifat themiscriptif seirta supported by oleioriit isifield studies. Friuse the data providedirgunakan meiform the data seicouldir and primeir, which meiglued oniraturan oniprime law legislationir, seicouldir, and teirsionir, seirta field data from informants. From the point of view of consumer protection theory, mistakes made by pharmacies, whether intentional or unintentional, pharmacies must still be held responsible for their mistakes in dispensing drugs to consumers. In case of action that meinewibabkan tirhappen toistart mateiriil youito other parties, can be asked toiit is obligatoryibased on article 1365 KUH Peidate. Oniimplementation of responsibilities peirdata kareibyierror in peinewirahan medicine must be done deijust my wayichange toistart mateireal and imateireal generated. if meidiasi not beirhasil, passin get meisued apoteitheirki the realm of law in PEijudge.