Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Dual Empire of Penal System Tanaem, Jerymia Seky; Al-Uyun, Dhia; Aprilianda, Nurini
Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Social Justice in Transition: A Global Perspectives
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ijls.v5i1.43718

Abstract

This study aimed to determine and analyze the "Ratio Decidendi" of Military judges at the Surabaya High Military Court III in deciding case Number 5K /PMT.III/AD/I/2022 against perpetrators of budget abuse by Military officials. The research method used by the author is a normative legal research method, by conducting research synchronization, systematics, and legal comparisons. The writer uses this type of normative legal research because, in formulating the problem, the writer emphasizes ratio decidendi to Military court decisions for misuse of budget management. This was influenced by the fact that Military Defendants who committed acts of misusing billions of rupiah in the budget were only sentenced to "Abuse of Power,” which refers to the Indonesian Military Code, with three months and twenty days in prison. In contrast to the main element, every person benefits himself and others or a corporation by abusing his authority, opportunities, or facilities available to him because this position or position can harm the country's finances and economy. Law No. 31/1999 Jo Law No. 20/2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes should be a reference and basis for applying sanctions for criminal acts of corruption within the Military, not only referring to the provisions in the Army's Criminal Code. Keywords: Military Court, Military Penal Code, Corruption, Corruption Court, The Corruption Eradication Commission
Prevention of Online Gambling Crime as an Effort to Protect Children in Indonesia from the Perspective of Criminology Islami, Michelia Zahra; Madjid, Abdul; Al-Uyun, Dhia
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v5i2.866

Abstract

Throughout 2023, KiDi's pediatric clinic in Pejaten, South Jakarta treated nearly 50 children addicted to online gambling. From initially high school and junior high school teenagers, in the last three months it has been elementary school children in grades 5 and 6, mostly from upper middle class families. In the long run, their quality of life will deteriorate further. The impact of online gambling starts from no passion for life, not being able to focus on work, even getting into debt and the most fatal is to commit suicide. The focus of criminology is to find knowledge or reasons about social symptoms such as crime in society or why defendants commit their evil deeds. The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze regulations related to online gambling and child protection and analyze the causes of children committing online gambling in order to find out what prevention strategies are appropriate to minimize online gambling by children. Regulations related to online gambling are regulated as in Articles 303, 303 bis of the Criminal Code, Articles 426-427 of the new Criminal Code, and Article 27 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law. Meanwhile, child protection regulations are regulated in Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection. Prevention efforts can be carried out by supervising the association of children and providing an understanding that online gambling is a bad act and can be charged with criminal sanctions.
Between Revelation and Constitution: The Sovereignty Fiqh of Muhammad Yamin’s Sociopolitical Ijtihād Said, Muhtar; Fadli, Moh.; Widiarto, Aan Eko; Al-Uyun, Dhia
Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Islamic Law
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/jil.v6i2.4220

Abstract

The crucial aspect of studying Indonesian constitutional law that is often overlooked is the dialectic between revelation (religion) and the constitution (state). This interplay significantly influences the foundational thinking of the nation’s architects and shapes constitutional law, as well as critical perspectives on colonialism. This study aims to examine the political-legal thought of Muhammad Yamin by revealing how the interaction between revelation and constitution shaped his ideas regarding the basis and sovereignty of the Indonesian state. Utilizing a textual analysis of historical documents, this research situates Yamin’s thought within the broader context of constitutional formulation as part of an intellectual resistance against colonial hegemony. The findings reveal that Yamin’s concept of sovereignty fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), which is grounded in the Islamic principle of shūrā (deliberation), represents a sociopolitical ijtihād (independent reasoning) that systematically critiques the Netherlands-Indonesia Union. Furthermore, it clearly articulates his idea of a “pembanding” or comparator, a conceptual precursor to judicial review. Theoretically, this study expands the scope of sociopolitical fiqh within contemporary constitutional discourse. [Aspek krusial dalam kajian hukum ketatanegaraan Indonesia yang sering diabaikan adalah dialektika antara wahyu (agama) dan konstitusi (negara). Interaksi ini memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap dasar pemikiran para perumus bangsa dalam membentuk hukum konstitusi, serta memberikan perspektif kritis terhadap kolonialisme. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pemikiran politik-hukum Muhammad Yamin dengan mengungkap bagaimana interaksi antara wahyu dan konstitusi mengonstruksi gagasannya mengenai dasar dan kedaulatan negara Indonesia. Melalui analisis tekstual terhadap dokumen-dokumen historis, penelitian ini menempatkan pemikiran Yamin dalam konteks yang lebih luas dari proses perumusan konstitusi sebagai bagian dari perlawanan intelektual terhadap hegemoni kolonial. Temuan ini mengungkap bahwa konsep fikih kedaulatan Yamin, yang berakar pada prinsip syūrā dalam Islam, merupakan suatu ijtihad sosio-politik yang secara sistematis mengkritik Uni Indonesia-Belanda. Selain itu, konsep tersebut secara jelas mengartikulasikan gagasannya tentang “pembanding”, yang merupakan cikal bakal konseptual dari uji materiil (judicial review). Secara teoretis, studi ini memperluas cakupan fikih sosio-politik dalam wacana ketatanegaraan kontemporer.]
Reevaluating the Principle of Legal Fiction: Balancing Legal Certainty and Social Justice Said, Muhtar; Fadli, Moh.; Widiarto, Aan Eko; Al-Uyun, Dhia
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Legal Transformation and Policy Challenges in Indonesia: Navigating Technology
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v10i1.13388

Abstract

The principle of legal fiction is widely recognized for its role in legitimizing laws and ensuring legal certainty. However, while it contributes to the stability and predictability of legal applications, it also has inherent weaknesses that may lead to unjust outcomes, particularly for vulnerable groups who are unaware of the law. In the context of Indonesia’s vast territory, the lack of widespread socialization and public awareness of new legal regulations exacerbates these issues. Consequently, individuals, especially from lower socioeconomic classes, may become inadvertently entangled in legal processes due to their ignorance of applicable laws, leading to potential injustices. The principle of legal fiction, therefore, may inadvertently serve as a tool of oppression, particularly when used to position suspects as defendants without adequate awareness or understanding of their legal rights. This paper argues for a re-evaluation and improvement of the principle to ensure a more just and transparent application. A more nuanced approach is needed, distinguishing between its absolute application in criminal cases and its non-absolute use in regulatory offenses. By refining the concept of legal fiction, we can enhance both its legitimacy and its capacity to uphold justice for all members of society.
Reconstructing the Legal Framework of AI Use in Indonesia's 2024 Presidential Campaign: A Progressive and Responsive Law Perspective Tasya, Izzuma; Susmayanti, Riana; Al-Uyun, Dhia
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education (On Progress July-Desembe
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1265

Abstract

The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Indonesia's 2024 presidential campaign reveals a significant legal gap in Law No. 7 of 2017 on Elections. Using a normative juridical approach, this study examines the 1945 Constitution, Election Law, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 166/PUU-XXI/2023. Findings show that while the Court prohibits "excessive” AI manipulation under the notion of citra diri (self-image), no binding technical rules exist to govern its use. The study employs the theories of Radbruch's Legal Purpose, Satjipto Rahardjo’s Progressive Law, and Nonet–Selznick's Responsive Law to analyse justice, certainty, and social benefit in regulating AI campaigns. It concludes that AI-driven campaigning through avatars, deepfakes, and microtargeting poses constitutional risks unless addressed by adaptive, participatory, and justice-oriented regulation. Thus, responsive and progressive legal reform is crucial to preserving electoral integrity and democratic legitimacy in the digital era.