Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) LamLaj
Nurdiannisa, Alifa
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Instansi Pendidikan Yang Melakukan Penahanan Ijazah Menurut Hukum Perdata Keppy, Christmas Petra; Adrini, Shaina Subha; Loren, Medina; Ariana, Jessica; Nurdiannisa, Alifa; Yuli, Yuliana
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11746682

Abstract

This study examines the practice of withholding diplomas by educational institutions from legal, sociological, and philosophical perspectives. Diploma withholding is often implemented by schools as a means to enforce tuition payment, but this practice raises legal and ethical controversies. This research employs a literature study method with a descriptive-analytical approach to analyze the legal basis for diploma withholding, its impact on students' rights, and its relation to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Number 4 on quality education. The findings indicate that withholding diplomas without clear legal grounds violates students' rights and can negatively affect educational access equality. Diploma withholding also exacerbates social and economic disparities. Therefore, legal advocacy and policy changes are needed to ensure that diploma withholding is conducted in accordance with legal provisions and justice principles.
Analisis Hak Para Pekerja Dalam Perusahaan Yang Mengalami Kepailitan Nurdiannisa, Alifa; Hervinia H, Helen; Ariana H, Jessica; Loren, Medina
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11853588

Abstract

A company is not always in prime condition because certainly in a company experiencing liquidity problems, declining profitability, and ultimately can be threatened with bankruptcy caused by various factors. The process of bankruptcy of a company is brought to court by appointing a curator. In Indonesia, regulations have been set regarding this bankruptcy process which are contained in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. This regulation regulates the rights of workers if they are in a company that is bankrupt so that they know the steps that need to be taken. This study aims so that every worker who experiences something like this knows how the provisions that regulate, the elements that influence and the efforts that can be made in this situation. This study uses a normative juridical method that analyzes the legal norms that have been made. The data source comes from secondary legal data such as Law Number 37 of 2004, Law Number 13 of 2003. The data collection technique is in the form of literature studies. This study resulted in that every company that experiences bankruptcy is required to provide rights to workers who are laid off, namely in the form of pocket money since the bankruptcy decision so that workers' rights must be prioritized, and someone who is appointed to resolve bankruptcy problems is a curator.
Structuring Liability in Performance-Based Copyright Infringement: A Legal Analysis of the Ari Bias and Agnes Mo Licensing Disputes Nurdiannisa, Alifa; Suherman, Suherman
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Commercial music performances frequently involve the use of copyrighted works, yet creators in Indonesia continue to face losses arising from unlicensed song usage and unpaid royalties. The dispute between Ari Bias and Agnez Mo highlights a longstanding ambiguity in the Copyright Law particularly the absence of an explicit division of responsibility between singers and event organisers for obtaining licences and ensuring royalty payments. This study examines which party bears primary legal responsibility within the framework of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright, using a normative juridical approach supported by literature-based data collection and qualitative descriptive analysis The study finds that although the Copyright Law does not expressly allocate responsibility, its formulation of “performers” encompasses both singers and event organisers. This interpretation aligns with the functional role each party plays in commercial performances: singers as those who communicate the work to the public, and organisers as entities that control the venue, derive economic benefit, and facilitate the commercial exploitation of the copyrighted work. Consequently, both parties share joint responsibility for obtaining licences and paying royalties. This interpretation is reinforced by the Supreme Court’s cassation ruling in the Ari Bias vs. Agnez Mo case, which identified error in persona due to the exclusion of the event organiser as a defendant. The decision underscores that responsibility in commercial song performances is inherently shared. These findings contribute to strengthening legal certainty and clarifying the obligations of singers, creators, and event organisers in Indonesia’s music industry, while demonstrating the need for more explicit regulatory guidance.
Co-Authors Adrini, Shaina Subha Ariana H, Jessica Ariana, Jessica Hervinia H, Helen Keppy, Christmas Petra Loren, Medina Suherman, Suherman Yuli, Yuliana