Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Loren, Medina
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Instansi Pendidikan Yang Melakukan Penahanan Ijazah Menurut Hukum Perdata Keppy, Christmas Petra; Adrini, Shaina Subha; Loren, Medina; Ariana, Jessica; Nurdiannisa, Alifa; Yuli, Yuliana
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11746682

Abstract

This study examines the practice of withholding diplomas by educational institutions from legal, sociological, and philosophical perspectives. Diploma withholding is often implemented by schools as a means to enforce tuition payment, but this practice raises legal and ethical controversies. This research employs a literature study method with a descriptive-analytical approach to analyze the legal basis for diploma withholding, its impact on students' rights, and its relation to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Number 4 on quality education. The findings indicate that withholding diplomas without clear legal grounds violates students' rights and can negatively affect educational access equality. Diploma withholding also exacerbates social and economic disparities. Therefore, legal advocacy and policy changes are needed to ensure that diploma withholding is conducted in accordance with legal provisions and justice principles.
Analisis Hak Para Pekerja Dalam Perusahaan Yang Mengalami Kepailitan Nurdiannisa, Alifa; Hervinia H, Helen; Ariana H, Jessica; Loren, Medina
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11853588

Abstract

A company is not always in prime condition because certainly in a company experiencing liquidity problems, declining profitability, and ultimately can be threatened with bankruptcy caused by various factors. The process of bankruptcy of a company is brought to court by appointing a curator. In Indonesia, regulations have been set regarding this bankruptcy process which are contained in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. This regulation regulates the rights of workers if they are in a company that is bankrupt so that they know the steps that need to be taken. This study aims so that every worker who experiences something like this knows how the provisions that regulate, the elements that influence and the efforts that can be made in this situation. This study uses a normative juridical method that analyzes the legal norms that have been made. The data source comes from secondary legal data such as Law Number 37 of 2004, Law Number 13 of 2003. The data collection technique is in the form of literature studies. This study resulted in that every company that experiences bankruptcy is required to provide rights to workers who are laid off, namely in the form of pocket money since the bankruptcy decision so that workers' rights must be prioritized, and someone who is appointed to resolve bankruptcy problems is a curator.
Studi Komparasi Mediasi dan Konsiliasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pada Korporasi Hermawati, Mutiara; Rinanti, Pitra; Marito, Eugina Evita; Loren, Medina; Febriani, Anggie
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15481988

Abstract

In the corporate world, disputes between parties often require efficient resolution methods outside of litigation. Two commonly used mechanisms are mediation and conciliation. Although both fall under alternative dispute resolution (ADR), they differ fundamentally, particularly in the role of the third party. A mediator remains neutral and facilitates negotiation without offering solutions, while a conciliator takes a more active role by providing written proposals to the parties. This article explores the differences, similarities, and legal basis of both mechanisms to offer clearer understanding for business actors in choosing the most suitable resolution method.
Co-Authors Adrini, Shaina Subha Ariana H, Jessica Ariana, Jessica Febriani, Anggie Hermawati, Mutiara Hervinia H, Helen Keppy, Christmas Petra Marito, Eugina Evita Nurdiannisa, Alifa Rinanti, Pitra Yuli, Yuliana