Malik, Syaiful
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Menjamin Hak dan Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Orang Yang Berada Dalam Pengampuan Amanda, Niken Dwi; Nurdin, Merry Kurniawati; Zahra, Hilyah Az; Malik, Syaiful; Akbar, Soultan Raffly; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Guardianship is a legal mechanism to place an adult who is deemed incapable of independent action, such as due to age, mental condition, or physical limitations, on the same status as children who are not yet capable of legal action. A guardianship order can be requested by the spouse, family, prosecutor's office, or any other interested party. The Surya Permana case is used as an example to show how judges consider evidence and the Respondent's condition before deciding on guardianship. In this case, the judge appointed the Respondent's wife as guardian to manage the Respondent's legal and financial interests. This research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the guardianship mechanism, the rights of guardians, the legal process involved, and the importance of legal protection for individuals under guardianship. In this research, the author uses a normative legal method that is descriptive in nature. The results of the study show that guardianship is an important legal instrument to guarantee the civil rights of individuals and prevent actions that harm themselves or others. The process of establishing guardianship is conducted through juridical and non-juridical considerations by the judge to ensure that the individual really needs guardianship. Guardianship can end if the individual's condition improves and he or she is deemed competent to perform legal acts.
Analisis Kasus Korupsi Bantuan Sosial Pada Pandemi Covid-19 dari Perspektif Etika dan Profesionalisme Hukum Dewi, Ulva Kartika; Malik, Syaiful; Yadita, Devina; Nugraha, Rifansyah; Akbar, Soultan Raffly; Maulana, Muhammad Irfan; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15469288

Abstract

This research analyzes the handling of social assistance corruption cases during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of legal ethics and professionalism. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and case approach, referring to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. The results show that social assistance corruption cases involving high-ranking officials, such as Juliari Batubara, reflect the lack of moral integrity, transparency, and accountability in the legal and governance system. The implications of this case include state financial losses, decreased public trust, and socio-economic injustice for affected communities. This research recommends strengthening technology-based monitoring mechanisms, bureaucratic reform, and increasing the role of anti-corruption institutions to restore public trust. In conclusion, strict, independent, and justice-oriented law enforcement is needed to prevent similar practices in the future.