Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Trasaenda, Resfa Klarita
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertimbangan Hukum Dalam Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian Wicaksana, Dika Hikmah; Trasaenda, Resfa Klarita; Pramesti, Indira Yekti Widya; Sabrina, Amanda Feby; Insani, Gema Mutiara; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12179892

Abstract

The study cases were selected based on their relevance and complexity in the context of legal considerations in post-divorce child custody. Decision Number ---/Pdt.G/2023/PN Smn was chosen because it provides an in-depth understanding of the legal framework and factors considered in post-divorce child custody cases. This research will use a qualitative approach with a case study design. This approach was chosen to understand in depth the legal considerations used in determining child custody after divorce. Researchers will study legal documents such as court decisions, judge's considerations, and statutory regulations related to determining child custody after divorce. Post-divorce child custody can be a difficult and controversial issue, especially in cases involving an unexpected and disorganized divorce. In this research the author focuses on the context of legal considerations in post-divorce child custody in Decision Number ---/Pdt.G/2023/PN Smn. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. The research results show that court decisions can influence various aspects of children's lives, including economic stability, parenting patterns, and interactions with the social environment. Therefore, judges must consider all these aspects carefully and comprehensively to ensure that the decisions taken truly prioritize the best interests of the child.
Legal Force Of The Preliminary Sales Agreement (PPJB) As Evidence For The Seller Againts The Buyer Who Is In Breach Of Contract (Case Study: Decision Of The Surabaya District Court No.862/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Sby. Trasaenda, Resfa Klarita; Winanti, Atik
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2626

Abstract

This study discusses the legal force of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) as evidence for sellers against buyers who commit breach of contract, based on a study of Surabaya District Court Decision Number 862/Pdt.G/2021/PN Sby. This study is based on the prevalence of breach of contract cases in land sale and purchase agreements, which cause legal uncertainty for the parties involved. The main issue in this study is the legal force of a Sale and Purchase Agreement as evidence in Indonesian civil disputes. The purpose of this study is to understand the legal force of a Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) as evidence in civil disputes and to analyze the judge's considerations in Surabaya District Court Decision Number 862/Pdt.G/2021/PN Sby. The research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach and case approach through literature study. The results show that the PPJB has legal force as authentic evidence and that its cancellation must be carried out through a court decision. The judge's considerations in this case are deemed inappropriate because they state that there is a defect of will, whereas both parties agreed on their own will.
Legal Force Of The Preliminary Sales Agreement (PPJB) As Evidence For The Seller Againts The Buyer Who Is In Breach Of Contract (Case Study: Decision Of The Surabaya District Court No.862/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Sby. Trasaenda, Resfa Klarita; Winanti, Atik
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2626

Abstract

This study discusses the legal force of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) as evidence for sellers against buyers who commit breach of contract, based on a study of Surabaya District Court Decision Number 862/Pdt.G/2021/PN Sby. This study is based on the prevalence of breach of contract cases in land sale and purchase agreements, which cause legal uncertainty for the parties involved. The main issue in this study is the legal force of a Sale and Purchase Agreement as evidence in Indonesian civil disputes. The purpose of this study is to understand the legal force of a Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) as evidence in civil disputes and to analyze the judge's considerations in Surabaya District Court Decision Number 862/Pdt.G/2021/PN Sby. The research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach and case approach through literature study. The results show that the PPJB has legal force as authentic evidence and that its cancellation must be carried out through a court decision. The judge's considerations in this case are deemed inappropriate because they state that there is a defect of will, whereas both parties agreed on their own will.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS HAK GUNA BANGUNAN ATAS HAK PENGELOLAAN DALAM SENGKETA RUMAH SUSUN MANGGA DUA COURT Trasaenda, Resfa Klarita; Pramesti, Indira Yekti Widya; Sabrina, Amanda Feby; Insani, Gema Mutiara; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Lex Jurnalica Vol 22, No 3 (2025): LEX JURNALICA
Publisher : Lex Jurnalica

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/lj.v22i3.10301

Abstract

Pertumbuhan urbanisasi di Indonesia mendorong pembangunan hunian vertikal, namun sering memunculkan sengketa hukum terkait status tanah, khususnya Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB) di atas Hak Pengelolaan (HPL). Penelitian ini menganalisis kedudukan yuridis HGB atas HPL dalam sistem hukum pertanahan Indonesia, dengan fokus pada sengketa kepemilikan di Apartemen Mangga Dua Court, di mana pembatalan perpanjangan HGB oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) menimbulkan ketidakpastian bagi pemilik unit. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dan analisis kualitatif berbasis literatur, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa HGB atas HPL diakui secara hukum berdasarkan UUPA dan PP No. 18 Tahun 2021, namun bergantung pada persetujuan pemegang HPL sehingga berpotensi dibatalkan. Perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik rumah susun terhadap ketidakterbukaan status tanah oleh pengembang diperkuat oleh UU Rumah Susun dan UU Hak Tanggungan, yang mengakui Hak Milik atas Satuan Rumah Susun (HMSRS) sebagai hak mandiri. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa harmonisasi regulasi dan peningkatan kesadaran hukum diperlukan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan konsumen dalam pengelolaan tanah.
Co-Authors Atik Winanti Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Insani, Gema Mutiara Pramesti, Indira Yekti Widya Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Sabrina, Amanda Feby Wicaksana, Dika Hikmah