Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaturan Pihak Ketiga Dalam Pengadilan Umum, Agama, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sulistyowati, Sulistyowati; Nadya Maharani, Dewi; Bintang Maharaja, Gusti; Putri Manopo, Hanifa
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Juli - Agustus 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2445

Abstract

Indonesia mempunyai peradilan yang sangat banyak ragamnya. Ada peradilan umum, peradilan tata usaha negara (PTUN), militer, agama dan peradilan konstitusi yaitu Mahkamah Konstitusi. Selain itu ada peradilan khusus seperti peradilan pajak, tindak pidana korupsi, pengadilan niaga, pengadilan anak, pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia, pengadilan anak dan pengadilan hubungan industrial. Ketika beracara di pengadilan umum bidang perdata kita mengenal pihak ketiga yaitu pihak intervensi, begitu juga dalam PTUN maupun pengadilan agama. Namun meski hak kewajibannya sejenis nama pihak ketiga yang mempunyai kepentingan langsung disebut Pihak intervensi dan ada juga pihak ketiga yang lain yaitu Amicus Curiae. Tujuan pihak ketiga ada agar terjamin keadilan dan kepastian hukum bagi pihak yang hukum bagi semua pihak yang berkepentingan dalam suatu perkara, mencegah putusan yang merugikan pihak ketiga dan melindungi hak-haknya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif. Analisa yang dipergunakan kualitatif.
The urgency of limiting the presidential term by the constitution in the discourse of extending the term of the President of Indonesia Sulistyowati; Nadya Maharani, Dewi; Fanani, Ahwan
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November - December 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i1.308

Abstract

The discourse on the extension of the president's term has sparked controversy in society. This paper aims to describe the controversy and analyze it based on the democratic conditions in Indonesia, as well as its connection to the prevailing constitution in Indonesia. The rules governing this issue are found in Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution, which restrictively regulates term limitations. This paper employs a legal study approach with a qualitative research method based on various printed and online document sources.The analysis reveals that the proposal for the extension of the president's term originates from within the government circles and is subsequently supported by party leaders, citing economic development, political stability, and high levels of satisfaction with the government's performance as grounds. However, opposition arises from political parties, legal experts, academics, survey institutions, students, and even the general public. The rejection is based on inconsistencies with the constitution, survey results indicating a desire for a change in national leadership, concerns about power abuse, and non-conducive socio-economic conditions. An unconstitutional extension of the president's term could lead to a regression of democracy in Indonesia. The constitution plays a crucial role as a barrier to preserve the spirit of Reform, ensure the rotation of national leadership, and serve as a hope for national political change. This paper seeks to fill the gap in analyzing the connection between term limitations, democracy, and the constitution in the discourse on extension.