Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Daniel Tanati
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Ownership Patterns of Land Rights from the Perspective of Customary Law Communities in Waropen Regency Papua Province Daniel Tanati
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (March - April 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i3.361

Abstract

Ownership of land rights in the Waropen customary law community is very important because the land is a legacy of their ancestors which is used to meet their daily needs. The aim of this research is to find out more about land ownership rights from the perspective of the Waropen customary law community. The approach used is empirical, which looks directly at the reality that occurs among the Waropen traditional law community regarding ownership of land rights which are considered a legacy from their ancestors and are used to meet their daily needs. Data obtained from field observations, both primary and secondary, are then analyzed systematically so that the data can be accounted for. The results of this research reveal that the Waropen Indigenous people recognize 2 (two) types of land rights, namely ownership rights and use rights. Residents of the Waropen indigenous community can have property rights in the form of individual rights, family property rights which are the same as household property rights, and clan property rights or customary rights. Property rights in the Waropen language are called Mipena (Sanggei Village) or Risanau. Mipena or risanau in the traditional concept is originally a former garden. Former garden land refers to ownership of land or an area that is owned. Meanwhile, the right to use is the right to use or collect proceeds from land controlled by the state or land owned by another person, based on a mutual agreement between the land owner and the person who will use the land. In the Waropen indigenous community, this right of use can be differentiated into several groups of users of land rights, including the right to use for fellow Waropen people, this transfer is facilitated by the Government, the right to use for pastors, evangelists, teachers, health workers who come to dedicate themselves in the Waropen area and use rights are also given to traders from Bugis, Makassar, Java and Toraja as a place to carry out business activities.
Reconciliation of Human Rights, Positive Law, and Siyasah Syar'iyyah: An Innovative Approach to Addressing Human Rights Issues in the Contemporary Era Muannif Ridwan; Usman Jayadi; Sobardo Hamonangan; Daniel Tanati; James Yoseph Palenewen
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10433

Abstract

This study explores the reconciliation of Human Rights, positive law, and siyasah syar‘iyyah as an innovative approach to addressing contemporary human rights challenges. The tension between the universal norms of human rights and Islamic law often becomes a focal point in global discourse, particularly in countries with Muslim-majority populations. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach and normative analysis, this research examines the convergence and potential integration points among these three pillars. The goal is to develop a legal framework that is more holistic, just, and contextually grounded. The findings reveal that through epistemological dialogue and the contextual reinterpretation of religious texts, siyasah syar‘iyyah can bridge the principles of Sharia and modern human rights values. Meanwhile, positive law—as a state instrument—can accommodate transcendent values of justice, provided it is formulated with sensitivity to society's social, cultural, and religious dynamics. This study recommends an inclusive legislative model and a humanistic approach to interpreting religious texts to strengthen legal legitimacy and the protection of human rights. The academic contribution of this research lies in developing an integrative approach that systematically unites three bodies of knowledge: human rights theory, modern legal theory, and the thought of siyasah syar‘iyyah. The conceptual framework is a normative and practical model for inclusive and just legal policymaking.
Co-Authors James Yoseph Palenewen Muannif Ridwan Sobardo Hamonangan Usman Jayadi