Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Public Participation in Constitutional Amendments with Deliberation Requirements in the Unamendability Framework: A Comparative Study Nugraha, Xavier; Felicia, Stefania Arshanty; Hartono, Julienna
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 7 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v7i2.904

Abstract

From time to time, it is considered that Constitutional Amendments are lack of public participation and contains political aspects. Therefore, many nations regulate certain provisions to ensure that the Constitutional Amendments are merely for public order and welfare. One of the provision is the temporal unamendability. In the shape of deliberation requirements, which is essentially the involvement of the public in submitting constitutional amendments within a certain time limit. Indonesian Law doesn’t recognize the concept of deliberation requirements, therefore, the authors will analyze Sweden and South Korean Law, two countries that are also using civil law system and have regulated deliberation requirements in submitting constitutional amendments. This paper will discuss two problems: 1) the legal provisions for constitutional amendments in Indonesia, Sweden, and South Korea, and 2) the guarantee model for public participation in constitutional amendments using the deliberation requirements model. This paper uses legal research method, with a conceptual, statutory, and comparative approach. The results show that Sweden and South Korean Law have involved both the public and the Representative Body to determine wether constitutional amendment will be performed, meanwhile Indonesia hasn’t involve the public to vote for a constitutional amendments. Therefore, to guarantee public participation in constitutional amendments, the authors provide a model which include the public participation through vote or referendum to decide a constitutional amendments and a period of time to file for constitutional amendment.
Motivasi Mahasiswa Indonesia Mengikuti International Student Mobility Aziz, Aulia Luqman; Kirana, Nilla Chandra; Felicia, Stefania Arshanty
Indonesian Research Journal on Education Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): irje 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/irje.v4i3.1006

Abstract

Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui motivasi pelajar Indonesia dalam mengikuti International Student Mobility. Motivasi siswa dilihat dari kebutuhan berprestasi, kebutuhan berafiliasi, dan kebutuhan kekuasaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap mahasiswa UB dan UGM sebagai representasi mahasiswa Indonesia yang berminat mengikuti International Student Mobility. Metode penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan analisis data menggunakan metode 1) pengumpulan data 2) kondensasi data 3) penyajian data 4) penarikan kesimpulan. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa motivasi pelajar Indonesia mengikuti International Student Mobility adalah untuk meningkatkan prestasi, mendapatkan pendidikan yang lebih baik, menghadapi tantangan baru, menjalin relasi dan mempunyai kesempatan mendapatkan pekerjaan di luar negeri.
A Chance to Defend Regional Heads in The Procedure of Regional Head Dismissal as A Manifestation of The Proportionality Principle Aris, Mohammad Syaiful; Fauzurrahman, Iqbal; Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian; Nugraha, Xavier; Felicia, Stefania Arshanty
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.241-266

Abstract

The existence of regional autonomy in Indonesia is implemented through regional leaders who have the authority to run local government. When carrying out their duties, regional leaders are supervised by other state institutions as a form of checks and balances in government power. Hence, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders regulates to involve the Regional People's Representative Assembly, the Supreme Court, and the President through the Minister of Home Affairs as a form of right to dismiss. However, the existence of the proportionality principle in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, through the right given to regional leaders to defend themselves, has yet to be regulated in the law. This article talks about two things: first, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, and second, the legal consequences and the position of a chance to summon regional leaders to explain and defend themselves in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. This article aims to find the importance of proportionality principles in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. The method used in this article is legal research, with statutes, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of this research show that although the procedure to dismiss regional leaders has been regulated in law, applying the proportionality principle only exists in jurisprudences. Hence, an ius constituendum is needed to determine legal consequences and certainty regarding the procedure to dismiss regional leaders.