Adhistianto, Mohamad Fandrian
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Disobedience of Constitutional Court Decision as a Reason for Impeachment of President and Vice President Pahlawan MP, H. Muhamad Rezky; Adhistianto, Mohamad Fandrian; Nunna, Bhanu Prakash
Al-Risalah Vol 24 No 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1509

Abstract

This article discusses disobedience of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 which was carried out by the Government by issuing Minister of Home Affairs Instruction Number 68 of 2021 Concerning Follow-Up of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 Regarding the Formal Review of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation which in essence states that it remains guided and implement Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and its Implementing Regulations. This instruction from the Minister of Home Affairs has violated one of the rulings stating that the legally binding force of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation must be temporarily suspended for 2 (two) years or until the process of its formation has been repaired. This study uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach and is also evaluated descriptively and qualitatively. The conclusion of this paper is that disobedience to the constitution by the Government will have a juridical impact on not realizing legal certainty, impacting people's distrust of the Constitutional Court, as well as a bad example given by the President in terms of constitutional awareness, so that it is appropriate for the DPR RI to file an impeachment process against the president
PENERAPAN HUKUM KEBIASAAN SEBAGAI DASAR HUKUM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL (Studi Putusan: Nomor 233/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Bdg) Adhistianto, Mohamad Fandrian; Imaniyati, Neni Sri; Sundary, Rini Irianti
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 12, No 2 (2024): AGUSTUS-DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v12i2.85314

Abstract

The case that the author will discuss in this article is the decision of the Industrial Relations Court at the Bandung District Court which is registered with case number 233/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Bdg. regarding a dispute of interest regarding the 2017 Basic Salary Increase. The interesting thing in this decision is that the Panel of Judges decided by considering customary law as the legal basis in determining the components and amount of the 2017 Basic Salary Increase. This article is important because it discusses legal issues, namely the regulation customary law in resolving industrial relations disputes and the application of Customary Law in the Industrial Relations Court Decision Number 233/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Bdg. The research method used is normative juridical legal research using a statutory approach, and a case approach. Customary law is known in the process of resolving industrial relations disputes with further regulations regarding customs having to refer to the provisions of Article 1339 and Article 1347 of the Civil Code. The Panel of Judges at the Industrial Relations Court at the Bandung District Court has decided the case registered under number 233/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017/PN.Bdg. based on customs as stipulated in Article 1347 of the Civil Code.