Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Hegemony Of Javanese Political Culture In Regional Head Elections Agus Hiplunudin
Jurnal Scientia Vol. 13 No. 03 (2024): Education and Sosial science, June - August 2024
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58471/scientia.v13i03.2545

Abstract

As for this paper, it reviews the theory of hegemony and political culture. In this case, the Javanese tribe is the main theme. Given that the Javanese tribe is a fairly unique tribe - because of their large number - it is even more interesting if it is connected to the Regional Head Election (Pilkada). There are a number of reasons why ethnic issues are more likely to arise in regional elections compared to national elections such as legislative and presidential elections. First, candidate battles in Pilkada are generally local. Many candidates are running to represent certain groups. This causes candidates who happen to come from or are supported by the majority group to use ethnic issues and sentiments to gain support from voters. This is different from elections at the national level where candidates who run actually want to be perceived as accepted by all groups or groups. Second, the issues raised in local elections are generally local in nature, while issues in national elections are generally general issues such as education, foreign relations, and so on. Candidates running in national elections (such as presidential elections) do not talk about specific conditions in a region, but rather about programs and efforts that will be made to overcome national problems.
Governance failure dalam kebijakan bantuan alsintan di indonesia: telaah kritis atas distribusi, akuntabilitas, dan risiko klientelisme Tardi Setiabudi; Tino Supriantino; Agus Hiplunudin; Muharam Albana; Henry Dean Kresna
Jurnal Pengetahuan dan Pendidikan Vol 5 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Baru Haji Samsudin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Agricultural machinery assistance is a strategic instrument in Indonesia’s agricultural modernization agenda. The program is intended to improve farming efficiency, reduce production costs, accelerate farm operations, and widen farmers’ access to agricultural technology. However, the effectiveness of such assistance depends not only on the number of machines distributed but also on the quality of governance shaping planning, beneficiary targeting, distribution, utilization, and oversight. This article examines governance failure in Indonesia’s agricultural machinery assistance policy through three dimensions: distribution, accountability, and the risk of clientelism. It applies a critical literature review approach to open-access publications from 2022–2026 on agricultural mechanization, local government capacity, performance accountability, transparency, and political clientelism. The review shows that the core problems of agricultural machinery assistance are not merely technical but also institutional and political. Distribution becomes vulnerable to mistargeting when beneficiary verification is weak and local implementation capacity is limited. Accountability often remains procedural rather than oriented toward actual utilization and outcomes. In addition, because agricultural machinery assistance is materially valuable and politically visible, it may be vulnerable to patronage and clientelist intervention at the local level. The article argues that reforming agricultural machinery assistance requires transparent, accountable, utilization-based governance and stronger safeguards against transactional political interference.