Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of Reform Policy: Bureaucracy in Strengthening Resource Shuman Resources in Ternate City Hendra Karianga; Rasty Amalia; Siti Barora Sinay; M Junaidi
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1586

Abstract

Implementation of Reform Policy: Bureaucracy in Strengthening Resource Shuman Resources in Ternate City. Objective: This study aims to determine the process, identify and analyze aspects that are obstacles in the Implementation of Bureaucratic Reform Policy in Strengthening Human Resources in the Ternate City Inspectorate based on the determining factors for success in the implementation of decentralized policies by G. Shabbir Cheema and Dennis A. Rondinelli. Method: This study was conducted using a qualitative descriptive method to help interpret the phenomena that occur. The theory used is the policy implementation theory according to G. Shabbir Cheema and Dennis A. Rondinelli which consists of environmental conditions, inter-organizational relationships, and characteristics and capabilities of implementing agencies. Results: The results of the study generally indicate that the Implementation of Bureaucratic Reform Policy in Strengthening Human Resources in the Ternate City Inspectorate is running well, but if you look at the impact and performance resulting from bureaucratic reform, it is still slow and not optimal. This is because the overall support for the determining factors for success in policy implementation has not been met, both from environmental conditions, inter-organizational relationships, organizational resources, and characteristics and capabilities of implementing agencies. Conclusion: The suggestion from the research is the need for improvement in work culture commitment, communication, and creating a sense of ongoing involvement, as well as fulfilling the still lacking resources to support effectiveness and smoothness.  
Analysis of Decision of The Honorary Council of The Constitutional Court Number 2/MKMK/L/11/2023 Based on The Constitutional Court Regulation Number 1 of 2023 Concerning the Honorary Council of The Constitutional Court Tuanany, Egfa G; Siti Barora Sinay; Andika Adhyaksa
Journal of Legal Contemplation Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Legal Contemplation
Publisher : Candela Edutech Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63288/jlc.v1i2.7

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's Honorary Council's decision was deemed wrong in imposing sanctions on the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court, Anwar Usman. This study aims to determine how the implementation of the Constitutional Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court is carried out against the Decision of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court Number 2/MKMK/L/11/2023 and to find out and understand what is the basis for consideration for the judges of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court in the decision Number 2/MKMK/L/11/2023. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research, using a research approach by examining and reviewing the object of research through laws and regulations by sharpening research data that aims to find out the problems being discussed, while the type of research is qualitative using descriptive analysis. The results of the study indicate that the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court did not apply the Constitutional Court Regulation Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court as it should so that in the decision of the MKMK Number 2/MKMK/L/11/2023 it cannot provide legal certainty. Therefore, the provisions governing the types of sanctions for reported judges who are proven to have committed ethical violations are not explained properly. However, the decision is final and binding internally on the Constitutional Court.