Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Konsekuensi Hukum terhadap Perusahaan dan Tenaga Kerja Akibat Ketidakpatuhan dalam Pembayaran Iuran BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Yusuf, Farizh Maulana; Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10653

The purpose of this research is to find out the legal consequences for companies that do not fulfill the obligation of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan contributions, as well as the legal consequences caused to workers. The background of this research is that although there is a legal regulation that requires it, many companies still have not paid BPJS Ketenagakerjaan contributions, causing losses to workers. This problem is urgent to study because compliance with the payment of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan contributions is a form of social protection and rights that must be fulfilled by the company according to the employment agreement. The statutory approach and conceptual approach are the 2 (two) methodological approaches used in this normative juridical research. This research uses library research as the method of data acquisition. This research presents facts and information using descriptive data analysis methodology, and then draws many conclusions as research findings. The novelty of this research lies in its in-depth focus on the legal consequences from a civil law perspective, including aspects of default and tort by companies that fail to pay contributions. The results show that company non-compliance in the payment of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan contributions can be subject to administrative sanctions, criminal sanctions, and civil lawsuits, as well as causing significant losses to the workforce, such as losing the right to social security. This research was conducted in order to provide a more comprehensive insight into the legal implications and steps that can be taken by workers to obtain their rights. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui konsekuensi hukum bagi perusahaan yang tidak memenuhi kewajiban iuran BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, serta akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan terhadap pekerja. Latar belakang dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa meskipun telah ada peraturan hukum yang mewajibkannya, banyak perusahaan yang masih belum membayar iuran BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, sehingga menimbulkan kerugian bagi para pekerja. Masalah ini mendesak untuk dikaji karena kepatuhan terhadap pembayaran iuran BPJS Ketenagakerjaan adalah bentuk perlindungan sosial dan hak yang harus dipenuhi oleh perusahaan sesuai perjanjian kerja. Pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) merupakan 2 (dua) metodologi pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian yuridis normatif ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan studi kepustakaan (library research) sebagai metode perolehan data. Penelitian ini menyajikan fakta dan informasi dengan menggunakan metodologi analisis data secara deskriptif, dan kemudian menarik banyak kesimpulan sebagai temuan penelitian. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini terletak pada fokusnya yang mendalam pada konsekuensi hukum dari perspektif hukum perdata, termasuk aspek wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum oleh perusahaan yang lalai membayar iuran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakpatuhan perusahaan dalam pembayaran iuran BPJS Ketenagakerjaan dapat dikenai sanksi administratif, pidana, dan gugatan perdata, serta menyebabkan kerugian signifikan bagi tenaga kerja, seperti kehilangan hak atas jaminan sosial. Penelitian ini dilakukan agar dapat memberikan wawasan yang lebih menyeluruh mengenai implikasi hukum serta langkah-langkah yang dapat ditempuh oleh pekerja untuk memperoleh hak-haknya.

Exercising the Role and Authority of Indonesia's Senate: Implications of Constitutional Court Decision 92/PUU-X/2012 Kafandi, Muhammad Afif; Setiadi, Wicipto; Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin
Research Horizon Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): Research Horizon - October 2024
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.4.5.2024.379

The Regional Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah/DPD) in Indonesia is a legislative body that reflects the country's bicameral system, which includes two chambers. However, the DPD’s authority is notably weaker than that of the House of Representatives (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat/DPR), leading to what is often described as "soft bicameralism" in Indonesia. This study explores the role and authority of the DPD following the Constitutional Court Decision Number 92/PUU-X/2012, which addressed the DPD's function within the legislative process. The research adopts a normative approach, focusing on legal norms from the 1945 Constitution and related legislation, alongside a statutory and historical analysis. This includes examining relevant laws, such as Law Number 17 of 2014 and the DPR's 2014 Rules of Procedure, which incorporate the Constitutional Court's decision. This decision essentially introduced a tripartite legislative model involving the DPR, DPD, and the President, providing the DPD a role in Level I discussions. In Level II discussions, the DPD presents its opinions during plenary sessions before a bill’s approval between the DPR and the President. However, the DPD remains excluded from the final ratification. Strengthening the DPD's legislative authority requires a fifth constitutional amendment to enhance its role or a willingness by the DPR to share legislative responsibilities, thereby establishing a stronger checks and balances system.

Analysis of Law Number 20 of 2023 and the Role of Academic Manuscripts in Indonesian Law Formation Budi Dharma, Widya Castrena; Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman; Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Research Horizon - April 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.2.2025.472

Article 43 paragraph (3) of Law Number 12 of 2021 requires that every Draft Bill (Rancangan Undang-Undang/RUU) submitted by the President, the People's Representative Council, or the Regional Representative Council must include an Academic Manuscript. This document contains a scientifically proven legal study outlining the necessity of regulating a problem and its resolution in the Draft Bill. The Academic Manuscript serves as a key reference during the legislative planning process. This study explores the role of the Academic Manuscript in law formation and analyzes the RUU on Amendments to Law Number 5 of 2014, focusing on its alignment with the Academic Manuscript. Using legal and empirical approaches, the research evaluates the application of norms under the Law on the Legislation Drafting, which mandates an Academic Manuscript for drafting laws. Law Number 20 of 2023 accommodates strategic issues highlighted in the Academic Manuscript. However, during the discussion process, the RUU underwent significant changes, with over 50% of its substance added. Despite these additions, the Academic Manuscript remained unchanged. Ultimately, the RUU led to the repeal of Law Number 5 of 2014 and its replacement with Law Number 20 of 2023, which redefines the regulations concerning the State Civil Apparatus.

IMPLIKASI YURIDIS HAK ANGKET DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT TERHADAP HASIL PEMILIHAN UMUM Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin; Zaifa, Gilang Abi
Semarang Law Review (SLR) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/slr.v5i2.10827

The right of inquiry of the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) is the authority to investigate specific issues deemed significant and requiring clarification. This authority is regulated by Article 20A of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which states that the DPR has the right to investigate matters considered important and in need of clarification. The right of inquiry is actually related to the parliamentary system of government as a mechanism for overseeing the government. The purpose of this writing is to understand the use of the DPR's right of inquiry against the General Election Commission (KPU) and the implications of the DPR's right of inquiry on the election results. The research method used is normative research, employing legal and conceptual approaches. The results of this research indicate that the DPR's right of inquiry can be applied to the KPU as part of the government, despite its status as an independent institution. This is because the KPU is a state auxiliary organ, an institution of the state that carries out specific government functions and tasks, namely organizing elections. Furthermore, the right of inquiry cannot entirely annul election results. The right of inquiry cannot directly invalidate the results of general elections, but it can have legal implications when the inquiry's findings serve as evidence of irregularities in the electoral process. The DPR's decision on the inquiry can be submitted to the Constitutional Court as evidence that strengthens claims of irregularities, ultimately resulting in the annulment of election results.AbstrakHak angket DPR RI merupakan wewenang untuk melakukan penyelidikan terhadap isu tertentu yang dianggap signifikan dan membutuhkan klarifikasi. Kewenangan ini diatur oleh Pasal 20A UUD NRI 1945, yang menyebutkan bahwa DPR memiliki hak untuk menyelidiki masalah yang dianggap penting dan memerlukan klarifikasi. Hak angket sebenarnya berkaitan dengan sistem pemerintahan parlementer sebagai mekanisme pengawasan terhadap pemerintah. Tujuan penulisan ini yaitu untuk mengetahui penggunaan hak angket DPR terhadap Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) dan bagaimana implikasi hak angket DPR terhadap Hasil Pemilihan Umum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu bahwa hak angket DPR dapat dilakukan terhadap KPU sebagai pihak dari pemerintah meskipun statusnya sebagai lembaga independen. Hal ini karena KPU merupakan state auxiliary organ yang merupakan lembaga negara yang menjalankan fungsi dan tugas pemerintahan tertentu yaitu menyelenggarakan pemilihan umum. Kemudian hak angket tidak sepenuhnya dapat membatalkan hasil pemilu. Hak angket tidak dapat secara langsung membatalkan hasil pemilihan umum, tetapi dapat memiliki dampak hukum ketika hasil angket ditemukan sebagai bukti kecurangan dalam pemilihan umum. Keputusan DPR atas angket dapat diajukan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai bukti yang memperkuat klaim kecurangan, yang pada akhirnya dapat mengakibatkan pembatalan hasil pemilihan.

Opportunities in the Imposition of Legal Accountability Against Individuals Destroying the Environment Across Borders: Challenges and Barriers Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin; Fauzan, Muhammad; Zaifa, Gilang Abi
MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 5, No. 1 (Juni 2025)
Publisher : MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum published by the Islamic Criminal Law Program of the Sharia and Islamic Economics Department at the Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/maqasidi.v5i1.3551

Within the horizon of international law, individuals can only be held accountable if they commit violations of international criminal law as set out in the Rome Statutes. However, environmental destruction does not fall within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court to prosecute. On the other hand, environmental destruction is often attributed to the state as a subject of law, even though individuals who are the main perpetrators of environmental destruction cannot be held accountable internationally. This shows weaknesses in the international legal system in arresting and punishing individuals responsible for environmental damage across borders. The research method used is normative research with a legislative approach, in this study using several international provisions. The result of this study is that recognition of environmental destruction is very important, especially when the state is held accountable by other aggrieved countries. This accountability request can be brought to International Court of Justice with certain limitations. Through Article 5 of the Rome Statute, this recognition allows international courts to prosecute perpetrators of environmental destruction, so that law enforcement of environmental destruction can be carried out to the maximum. It is hoped that there will be an active role in Indonesia and the international community in responding to environmental destruction and making it as a 'Crime' special. Thus, international environmental law enforcement becomes more optimal and provides justice for all affected parties, both directly and indirectly.

Financial Management of Public Service Bodies in State Universities: Juridical Analysis of Fees for the Development of Independent Path New Student Institutions Arazid, Arazid; Sugiyono, Heru; Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin
Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies Том 3 № 02 (2025): Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies
Publisher : PT. Riset Press International

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59653/jplls.v3i02.1569

This study investigates the financial management of Public Service Agencies (BLU) within Indonesian state universities, focusing on the unauthorized imposition of institutional development fees (SPI/IPI) on independent pathway students at Udayana University, resulting in significant State financial losses. Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research analyzes regulatory frameworks, institutional accountability, and the legal implications of fee structures that contravene Ministry of Finance regulations (PMK No. 51/2015 and PMK No. 95/2020). Findings reveal systemic non-compliance in fee determination, where SPI/IPI charges were applied without legal authorization, bypassing mandated tariff protocols. The study identifies critical lapses in oversight, including the rector's failure to align fee policies with national financial regulations and the misuse of BLU flexibility, which enabled the diversion of funds into non-transparent banking practices. The case underscores the vulnerability of BLU's financial autonomy to mismanagement and corruption, particularly in the absence of robust accountability mechanisms. Recommendations emphasize the urgent need for legal reforms to enhance transparency, strengthen auditing processes, and clarify punitive measures for violations. This research contributes to the discourse on public financial governance in higher education, advocating for institutional reforms to prevent future fiscal mismanagement and uphold the integrity of State’s resources.

LANGKAH PENATAAN KELEMBAGAAN UNTUK MENCAPAI REFORMASI REGULASI DI INDONESIA MELALUI PEMBUBARAN LEMBAGA NEGARA NONSTRUKTURAL Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 10 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v10i1.7550

The President has taken a policy to dissolve state institutions, most recently through Presidential Regulation Number 112 of 2020, which dissolved 10 non-structural state institutions. This is suspected as a decisive step to create effectiveness in the legal system within the state institutions. Factually, there are currently too many regulations being created by state institutions, causing an overlap of duties and authorities, and inefficiency due to self-entanglement, making each state institution difficult to operate. Therefore, there is a need for a reduction in state institutions to achieve regulatory reform that is results-oriented, not just procedural. This is based on the goal of legal development, which is not only inherent in substance but also in legal structure and culture. The purpose of this research is to understand, examine, and analyze the President's considerations for the dissolution of non-structural state institutions and to analyze the implications of the dissolution of non-structural state institutions on the formation of regulations and legal order in Indonesia. This research method uses normative legal research with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach referring to literature studies. The conclusion of dissolving non-structural state institutions is aimed at improving bureaucratic performance by minimizing overlapping duties and functions that result in the waste of authority and budget inefficiency. Additionally, there is a need for further regulation at the legislative level regarding non-structural institutions to establish fixed procedures from formation to dissolution, similar to the concept of regulating state ministries in Law No. 39 of 2008 concerning State Ministries.

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 7 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search