Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

DYNAMICS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN VILLAGE HEAD ELECTION TASIK SERAI BARAT SUB-DISTRICT TALANG MUANDAU DISTRICT BENGKALIS PERIOD 2017-2023 Hutabalian, Raja Hizkia; Pane, Rico Purnawandi
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 11: Edisi II Juli - Desember 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is motivated by the village head election which was held simultaneously for the first time in Tasik Serai Barat Village, Talang Muandau District, Bengkalis Regency. The Village Head Election held in Tasik Serai Barat Village aims to elect the village head for the 2017-2023 term. In its implementation, it was found that things were not in accordance with the village head election process conducted for the first time by Tasik Serai Barat Village in 2017. Namely, the re-election of votes caused by objections from three candidates for the temporary village head has been determined by the winning committee in the village head election in Tasik Serai Barat Village. This study aims to determine the causal factors and dispute resolution of the village head election in Tasik Serai Barat village, Talang Muandau sub-district, Bengkalis Regency for the 2017- 2023 period. The research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The types of data are primary data and secondary data, primary data obtained directly from informants. While secondary data is supporting data or strengthening primary data. Data collection techniques are carried out by means of interviews and documentation. This research uses the theory of horizontal pluralism and vertical pluralism from Ramlan Surbakti, (2010), andthe theory of dispute resolution from Kartikasari SN. (2001). The results of this study indicate that the causes of the Village Head election dispute in Tasik Serai Barat Village are ethnic differences and the distribution of power, theresolution of the village head election dispute in Tasik Serai Barat Village is not well implemented and has not shown the existence of a settlement process that has been regulated in Bengkalis Regency Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Bengkalis Regency Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2015 article 50 paragraph (3). Keywords: Dispute Resolution, Village Head Election, Law
Gerakan Pelatihan Pencegahan Stunting di Desa Tasik Serai Barat Hutabarat, Sakti; Marpaung, Noveri Lysbetti; Amri, Rahyul; Siahaan, Chandro Nainggolan; Gultom, Marlina Octa Venita; Sihombing, Taruli Devi; Hutabalian, Raja Hizkia; Pasaribu, Dewi Fitri Novita; Lutfia, Anisa; Siregar, Albert Timbul; Rajagukguk, Jelita Mianarta; Ningsi, Rani Fitri Arya; Nursaldila, Nursaldila
Journal of Community Engagement Research for Sustainability Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): Juli
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/cers.3.4.182-190

Abstract

Stunting is a public health problem that must be taken seriously. Toddlers who experience stunting have a lower level of intelligence, making children more susceptible to disease and in the future may be at risk of decreasing productivity levels. At the end, stunting broadly can inhibit economic growth, increase poverty and widen inequality. Sustainable education is considered to be one way to reduce stunting rates. This service has the aim of increasing public knowledge including adolescents, pregnant women, and Posyandu cadres. Therefore, all of them can recognize stunting, have knowledge to prevent and manage stunting. The material of training is given to 20 participants in 60 minutes. The knowledge level of participants is measured before and after this activity through Pretest and Posttest. The results of the pretest shows that 4 participants have good knowledge, 12 participants had moderate knowledge, and 4 participants had poor knowledge. The level of knowledge increased after the presentation of the material, also through the question and answer session, namely 15 participants had good knowledge, and 5 participants had moderate knowledge. This activity succeeded in increasing public knowledge.