Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa Indonesia Mahasiswa Terhadap Dosen Melalui Media WhatsApp Oleh Mahasiswa Biologi UNIMED Hadyan Wafi Nahdah; Priska Amanda; Alya Anugrah Siregar; Nitya Ilmi Hasibuan; Lili Tansliova
Inspirasi Dunia: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Bahasa Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Mei : Inspirasi Dunia: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Bahasa
Publisher : Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58192/insdun.v3i2.2083

Abstract

This study focused on UNIMED Biology Department students and aimed to find Indonesian language errors in their WhatsApp conversations with lecturers. The data included messages sent by UNIMED biology students to lecturers via WhatsApp. A qualitative analysis was conducted to compare this data with language error standards set in good and correct Indonesian language rules, such as EYD, PUEBI, and KBBI. The results showed that some of the language mistakes that often occur in conversation include incorrect word use, incorrect punctuation, and ineffective sentences
Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Asesmen Sumatif Akhir Semester Gasal Matematika Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar: Penelitian Priska Amanda; Bistari; Hery Kresnadi
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 2 (October 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.2973

Abstract

This study aims to describe the quality of the multiple-choice items in the odd-semester summative assessment of mathematics for Grade IV students at SD Negeri 39 Pontianak Kota in the 2024/2025 academic year, in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discriminating power. The research employed a descriptive method with a quantitative approach, supported by Microsoft Excel. The subjects of this study were the Grade IV mathematics summative assessment items. Data were collected through documentation techniques to obtain the test items and the answer recapitulation of Grade IV-A students. The analysis results showed that 11 items (44%) were valid, with a high reliability coefficient (0.70). Regarding the level of difficulty, 12 items were easy, 10 were moderate, and 3 were difficult. In terms of discriminating power, 1 item was categorized as very good, 6 as good, 5 as fair, 8 as poor, and 5 as very poor. Overall, 8 items (32%) were considered good and suitable for reuse, while 17 items (68%) needed revision or replacement as they did not yet meet the criteria for high-quality test items.