Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary
Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Penegakan Hukum terhadap Masyarakat Sekitar Sungai yang Melakukan Pembuangan Sampah Ilegal di Indonesia Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen; Virriantaka, Virriantaka; Romlih, Rheihan Nurrizki; Khoirunnisa, Balqis; Fatsym, Jennisyh Aurora; Rahayu, Mella Ismelina F
Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Vol 2, No 2 (2024): Desember 2024
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jerumi.v2i2.4460

Abstract

Krisis sampah global telah mengancam lingkungan dan kesehatan kita. Konsumsi berlebihan dan pengelolaan sampah yang buruk menjadi penyebab utama dari hal ini. Untuk mengatasi masalah ini, kita membutuhkan kesadaran masyarakat, kebijakan pemerintah yang kuat, dan inovasi teknologi.  Ada beberapa peraturan Undang-Undang yang mengatur mengenai penegakan hukum pengelolaan sampah ini, beberapa diantaranya yaitu UU Nomor 32 tahun 2009 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2008. Aturan-aturan ini menjadi beberapa landasan hukum dalam upaya penegakan hukum terhadap praktek pembuangan sampah Ilegal yang terjadi di Indonesia. Metode penelitian dalam penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, yang berfokus pada analisis dokumen-dokumen hukum beserta bahan pustaka. Tujuan utama artikel ini adalah untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum terhadap pembuangan sampah illegal oleh masyarakat sekitar dalam pencemaran air sungai di Indonesia.
A Critical Analysis of the Fulfillment of the Intent Element in the Dissemination of Private Content under the Electronic Information and Transactions Crime, Based on Decision No. 805/Pid.Sus.2024/PN.Jkt.Sel.: Analisis Kritis Pemenuhan Unsur Kesengajaan Penyebarluasaan Konten Pribadi Dalam Tindak Pidana ITE Studi Putusan Nomor 805/Pid.Sus.2024/PN.Jkt.Sel Rambe, Halgi Sujuangon Jhansen; Adhari, Ade
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i1.1410

Abstract

General Background: The rapid advancement of digital technology has increased legal challenges related to electronic information misuse, particularly within Indonesia’s Special Criminal Law governing Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT). Specific Background: Cases involving the dissemination of private content frequently raise questions regarding the fulfillment of intent or dolus as a requirement for criminal liability. Knowledge Gap: Judicial inconsistencies in assessing intent—especially in distinguishing intentional acts from negligence—indicate the need for deeper doctrinal analysis. Aims: This study critically examines the fulfillment of intent in the dissemination of private content under Article 27 ayat 1 jo. Article 45 ayat 1 of the EIT Law, based on Decision No. 805/Pid.Sus.2024/PN.Jkt.Sel. Results: The findings show that the court’s analysis relied on three key elements: actus reus, the absence of rights or consent, and mens rea reflected in the perpetrator’s awareness of wrongdoing, while also considering the defendant’s negligence or culpa. Novelty: This study exposes discrepancies between courtroom facts and judicial reasoning, revealing conceptual misalignment in applying intent within EIT cases. Implications: The research provides a clearer analytical framework for judges and legal practitioners to differentiate intentional wrongdoing from negligence in future EIT adjudications. Highlights: The study clarifies how intent is assessed in private-content dissemination cases under the EIT Law. Findings show discrepancies between courtroom facts and the court’s interpretation of intent. The research offers a clearer framework for distinguishing intent from negligence in future cases. Keywords: Intent, Negligence, EIT Law, Private Content, Criminal Liability
Co-Authors Ade Adhari Fatsym, Jennisyh Aurora Khoirunnisa, Balqis Rahayu, Mella Ismelina F Romlih, Rheihan Nurrizki Virriantaka, Virriantaka