Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hukum Responsif : Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon Journal Of Law Sciences (Legisci) Journal of Community Service (Abdisci)
Romlahayati, Yanti
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Power of Proof of Visum Et Repertum as Evidence in Murder Cases: A Case Study of Vina's Murder Noupel, M. Noupel; Romlahayati, Yanti; Nurhaqi, Ari; Henda, Raden; Ika Putri, Dessy; Nurfaidah, Gina
Jurnal Legisci Vol 2 No 3 (2024): Vol 2 No 3 December 2024
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/legisci.v2i3.567

Abstract

Murder cases have always increased significantly every year, with an increasingly violent modus operandi. One of the main challenges in uncovering murder cases is the limited evidence that can uncover legal facts. In the investigation process, it is necessary to have at least two valid pieces of evidence, one of which is expert testimony. Expert testimony is usually stated in the Visum et Repertum, which is very important in proving the crime. Visum et Repertum is a forensic medical statement that plays an important role in determining the cause of death, identifying the victim, and estimating the time of death. In terms of the application of Visum et Repertum, mistakes can occur; one of the cases of murder that is going viral today is the Vina murder case that occurred in 2016. In the case of Vina's murder, after going viral, new evidence emerged that was revealed even though there was a court decision with permanent legal force. This study aims to examine the role and position of Visum et Repertum as evidence in proving the crime of murder, with a case study on the case of Vina's murder at the Cirebon City District Court. The method used is a normative juridical approach, with secondary data in the form of court decisions and legal documents. The results of the study show that Visum et Repertum has a significant role in the process of proving the Vina murder case in Cirebon City, although sometimes, there can be errors in interpretation that affect the accuracy of legal decisions. Visum et Repertum provides authentic evidence that is important to solve the legal puzzle in the case of Vina's murder in Cirebon City, so it needs to be carefully considered by the judge in making a decision.
ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MIXUE FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS IN CIREBON REGENCY REVIEWED FROM GOVERNMENT REGULATION NO. 42 OF 2007 CONCERNING WARALABA Salza Hubbillah, Widya; Romlahayati, Yanti; Umar, Jaenudin
Hukum Responsif Vol 15 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/responsif.v15i2.9551

Abstract

A franchise agreement is one aspect of legal protection for the parties from acts that harm other parties. An exclusive agreement is an agreement to enter into an exclusive agreement that can result in hindering or hindering other business actors from entering into the same agreement. The purpose of writing this scientific paper is to find out how the implementation of Mixue franchise agreements according to Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising and Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The research method used in this scientific paper uses empirical juridical abbreviations, using primary and secondary data, which are then analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis. This study's results show that the Mixue franchise agreement implementation in Cirebon Regency is guided by Chapter 5 of Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007 concerning Franchise. However, suppose you look at Chapter 15 of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition in the Mixue franchise agreement. In that case, some practices cause monopolies and unfair business competition.
IMPLEMENTATION OF LAW NUMBER 33 OF 2014 CONCERNING HALAL PRODUCT ASSURANCE IN PEKIRINGAN VILLAGE Romlahayati, Yanti; Alisha Fasya Khoirunissa; Aulia Rahmawati; Cahya Hilda Laela; Shifaniya Isnaeni
Jurnal Abdisci Vol 1 No 11 (2024): Vol 1 No 11 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/abdisci.v1i11.450

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Assurance in Pekiringan Village, Kesambi District, Cirebon City. This law requires products circulating in Indonesia to have a halal certificate to increase consumer confidence and competitiveness of local products, especially MSMEs. The research method used is empirical juridical, with data collected through interviews and observations. The results of the study show that many MSMEs in Pekiringan Village do not have halal certificates. The main obstacles are the lack of information about the certification procedure, the low awareness of the importance of halal certificates, and the limitations in understanding the technology required for registration. More intensive socialization, education, and technical assistance are needed to increase the participation of MSMEs in the halal certification program.
Co-Authors Alisha Fasya Khoirunissa Ari Nurhaqi AULIA RAHMAWATI Cahya Hilda Laela Henda, Raden Ika Putri, Dessy Noupel, M. Noupel Nurfaidah, Gina Salza Hubbillah, Widya Shifaniya Isnaeni Umar, Jaenudin