Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Siber International Journal of Advanced Law
Jayawibawa, Marcellus
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
A Comparative Analysis of Mechanisms for Settlement of Election Disputes: Case Studies of Indonesia and South Africa Sistyawan, Dwanda Julisa; Saraswati, Retno; ALW, Lita Tyesta; Sally, Novian Uticha; Jayawibawa, Marcellus
Al-Risalah Vol 24 No 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1610

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of the mechanisms for settling election disputes in Indonesia and South Africa, focusing on transparency, accountability, effectiveness, and efficiency. Despite notable democratic advancements, both nations continue to grapple with challenges that could undermine the legitimacy of electoral outcomes and democratic stability. The research investigates how transparent and inclusive these mechanisms are, the extent of public scrutiny, and the accountability measures in place for responsible parties. It also assesses the timeliness of dispute resolution, enforceability of decisions, and their overall impact on electoral integrity and legitimacy. Key findings highlight the roles of Indonesia's Bawaslu and South Africa's IEC in ensuring openness and public participation while identifying political interference, resource constraints, and procedural complexities as significant challenges. The study further explores best practices such as engaging civil society, simplifying procedures, and adopting technology to enhance dispute resolution mechanisms. Through this analysis, the research contributes to the understanding of electoral governance and offers policy recommendations to strengthen democratic institutions in Indonesia and South Africa.
Coast Guard Plays a Role in Maritime Law Enforcement Widijowati, Rr.Dijan; Jayawibawa, Marcellus; Budisetyowati, Dwi Andayani
Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (July - September 2025)
Publisher : Siber Nusantara Review & Yayasan Sinergi Inovasi Bersama (SIBER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/sijal.v3i1.256

Abstract

Indonesia, as the world's largest archipelagic state, faces complex challenges in maritime law enforcement. The establishment of the Maritime Security Agency (BAKAMLA) as the embryo of the Indonesian Coast Guard aims to fulfill institutional needs to ensure security and safety within national waters. This study aims to analyze the essential role of BAKAMLA in maritime law enforcement and identify the regulatory challenges it faces. Using a normative juridical approach, this research examines various legal frameworks related to maritime institutions and authority. The findings reveal that overlapping regulations and authority among institutions such as the Indonesian Navy (TNI AL), the National Police (POLRI), the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (KKP), and others significantly hinder BAKAMLA’s effectiveness. Therefore, harmonization of maritime legal systems and regulations is urgently needed. It is recommended to enact a Coast Guard Law as a single regulation that designates BAKAMLA as the main coordinator of maritime law enforcement. This reform is expected to improve inter-agency coordination, integrate early detection systems, and strengthen Indonesia’s maritime sovereignty and security.
A Comparative Analysis of Mechanisms for Settlement of Election Disputes: Case Studies of Indonesia and South Africa Sistyawan, Dwanda Julisa; Saraswati, Retno; ALW, Lita Tyesta; Sally, Novian Uticha; Jayawibawa, Marcellus
Al-Risalah Vol 24 No 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1610

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of the mechanisms for settling election disputes in Indonesia and South Africa, focusing on transparency, accountability, effectiveness, and efficiency. Despite notable democratic advancements, both nations continue to grapple with challenges that could undermine the legitimacy of electoral outcomes and democratic stability. The research investigates how transparent and inclusive these mechanisms are, the extent of public scrutiny, and the accountability measures in place for responsible parties. It also assesses the timeliness of dispute resolution, enforceability of decisions, and their overall impact on electoral integrity and legitimacy. Key findings highlight the roles of Indonesia's Bawaslu and South Africa's IEC in ensuring openness and public participation while identifying political interference, resource constraints, and procedural complexities as significant challenges. The study further explores best practices such as engaging civil society, simplifying procedures, and adopting technology to enhance dispute resolution mechanisms. Through this analysis, the research contributes to the understanding of electoral governance and offers policy recommendations to strengthen democratic institutions in Indonesia and South Africa.
Co-Authors Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati, Dwi Andayani Lita Tyesta ALW Retno Saraswati Sally, Novian Uticha Sistyawan, Dwanda Julisa Widijowati, Rr. Dijan