<![CDATA[Social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have become significant channels for public discourse, where users freely express opinions, including negative sentiments and hate speech. To better understand public opinion, particularly in politically charged contexts, sentiment analysis can classify user comments as either positive or negative. This study aims to analyze public sentiment regarding the formation of a special advisory team for President Jokowi, using a sentiment classification approach. The study employed a Naïve Bayes classifier to analyze sentiment from 3,000 comments gathered from Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. The dataset was divided into 80% training data (used to train the model with known sentiment) and 20% test data. The Naïve Bayes algorithm was chosen for its simplicity and effectiveness in handling large datasets in text classification tasks. The Naive Bayes classification on sentiment analysis of public opinion regarding the appointment of presidential advisors achieved an overall accuracy of 71% in classifying the test data. Negative sentiment was classified with an accuracy of 71%, while positive sentiment was classified with an accuracy of 70%. The results demonstrate that the Naïve Bayes classifier is a viable method for sentiment analysis in political discourse, although the model's performance indicates room for improvement. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on sentiment analysis of public opinion specifically related to presidential advisory appointments, an area not yet extensively explored in sentiment analysis studies. This study contributes to the field by providing insights into the public’s perception of political decisions using machine learning techniques. The implications for future research include refining classification methods for better accuracy and applying the model to other political or governmental topics.]]>
