Abdillah, Maulana Farhan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Etika Notaris Dalam Era Digital: Dampak Branding Diri Dalam Profesionalisme Purna Ardana, I Gusti Ngurah; Kudus, Nurzamzawiah; Abdillah, Maulana Farhan
JATISWARA Vol. 40 No. 1 (2025): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jtsw.v40i1.1171

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis sejauh mana batasan seorang notaris dalam hal membranding diri di era digital saat ini. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan konseptual. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum Normatif dengan analisis bahan hukum secara deduktif – induktif. Sumber bahan hukum diperoleh melalui kepustakaan dan terdiri atas bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Adapun hasil temuan dalam penelitian yaitu Penyebab Notaris yang eksis melakukan branding diri ialah dikarenakan Pertambahan jumlah notaris di Indonesia yang pada akhirnya memicu banyak persaingan untuk mendapatkan klien. Pasal 15 UUJN dalam kaitanya mengenai branding diri, Notaris boleh melakukan penyuluhan hukum sebagai upaya branding diri melalui digitalisasi seperti media elektronik selama tidak digunakan sebagai promosi diri dan promosi pembuatan akta notaris. Dampak positifnya bahwa masyarakat bisa merasakan manfaat dari perkembangan digitalisasi penggunaan media sosial oleh notaris. Masyarakat bisa memperoleh ilmu pengetahuan dari media elektronik dan pengetahuan dari penyuluhan hukum yang semakin mudah tersebar luas. Di sisi lain terdapat larangan dalam hal branding diri dalam profesionalisme yaitu tidak mencantumkan jabatan notaris dan unsur yang berkaitan dengan kata “Notaris” pada media elektronik yang di gunakan.
Default of the Construction Service Provider as a Reason for Termination of the Construction Work Contract Pratama, Febrian Rizki; Abdillah, Maulana Farhan; Nuralify, Mohammad; Damayanti, Astri; AR, Febriyanti Putri
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5165

Abstract

Termination of a construction contract can be carried out if it arises as a result of failure to fulfill the obligations of one of the parties, in this case a wanprestatie occurs. Therefore, what form of wanprestatie is committed by the service provider is the reason for terminating the contract and what legal remedies can be taken to terminate the construction contract due to wanprestatie. The aim of this research is to analyze the form of wanprestatie by service provider as a reason for terminating the contract and analyzing the legal remedies taken by the construction service provider to terminate the contract due to wanprestatie. This research uses normative legal research using statute approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches. The first result is that the form of contract termination is in the form of a fundamental error with a benchmark, namely a form of wanprestatie committed by the service provider as a reason for terminating the contract by the service user, namely in the form of a fundamental error, such as work delays with a benchmark, namely the service provider has not been able to fulfill the work progress specified. It is agreed by the service user or service provider that they have not carried out their work after one month of signing the contract so that the service user gives a warning letter to the service provider to be given time to correct their negligence within the specified time period, which is done by giving a warning letter 3 (three) times. The second result is that service providers can take legal remedies against unilateral contract termination if they go through non-litigation, then they can take deliberation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration. Not only that, settlement can also be done through a dispute council. If using litigation, the service provider can make file a lawsuit in the District Court.