Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

OVERCOMING DRUG CRIMES IN SOCIETY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PANCASILA JUSTICE Kholiq, Abdul; Suyanto, Vincentius Simon; Sutikno, Edi
UNTAG Law Review Vol 9, No 1 (2025): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v9i1.6477

Abstract

Submission:2025-04-21Review:2025-05-17Accepted:2025-05-22Publish: 2025-5-31ABSTRACT: National development aims to create a prosperous, just, and equitable society, both materially and spiritually, based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Efforts to improve public services include health, narcotics, psychotropics, and other addictive substances. Drug crimes are generally not committed by individuals alone, but rather collectively, even by organized, well-organized, and highly secretive syndicates. Furthermore, drug trafficking is transnational in nature, carried out using sophisticated methods and technology. To combat drug abuse, the government has issued Law No. 5 of 1997 concerning Psychotropics and Law No. 22 of 1997 concerning Narcotics. Law No. 22 of 1997 has been revoked and replaced by Law No. 39 of 2009. General Provisions Article 1 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5 of 1997 concerning Psychotropics states that psychotropics are substances or drugs, whether natural or synthetic, not narcotics, which have psychoactive properties through selective influence on the central nervous system which causes typical changes in mental activity and behavior. Keywords: Combat, Criminal Acts, Drug, Pancasila JusticeSubmission:2025-04-21Review:2025-05-17Accepted:2025-05-22Publish: 2025-5-31ABSTRACT: National development aims to create a prosperous, just, and equitable society, both materially and spiritually, based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. Efforts to improve public services include health, narcotics, psychotropics, and other addictive substances. Drug crimes are generally not committed by individuals alone, but rather collectively, even by organized, well-organized, and highly secretive syndicates. Furthermore, drug trafficking is transnational in nature, carried out using sophisticated methods and technology. To combat drug abuse, the government has issued Law No. 5 of 1997 concerning Psychotropics and Law No. 22 of 1997 concerning Narcotics. Law No. 22 of 1997 has been revoked and replaced by Law No. 39 of 2009. General Provisions Article 1 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5 of 1997 concerning Psychotropics states that psychotropics are substances or drugs, whether natural or synthetic, not narcotics, which have psychoactive properties through selective influence on the central nervous system which causes typical changes in mental activity and behavior. 
Corporate Environmental Crime and the Crisis of Environmental Criminal Law Enforcement Sutikno, Edi; Rizki, Muh; Sudirwan, Sudirwan; Jera, Almi
Muhammadiyah Law Review Journal Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Muhammadiyah Law Review
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24127/mlr.v10i1.4899

Abstract

Environmental crimes committed by corporations are one of the main causes of massive, systemic, and sustainable environmental damage. Although various environmental legal instruments are available, the practice of enforcing environmental criminal law shows a weak and ineffective tendency in proportionally prosecuting corporate perpetrators. This article aims to analyze the crisis in environmental criminal law enforcement in dealing with corporate environmental crimes, as well as to identify the structural and normative factors that cause legal impunity. This study uses a normative-critical legal approach supported by a green criminology perspective to examine legislation, court decisions, and environmental law enforcement policies. The results of the study show that the dominance of an administrative approach, the limitations of the application of corporate criminal liability, and the low ecological orientation of criminal policy are the main factors contributing to the weak deterrent effect of environmental criminal law. This article argues that without reconstructing environmental criminal law policies that treat corporate environmental crimes as serious crimes against the public interest and ecosystem sustainability, environmental damage will continue to recur. The findings of this study are expected to contribute theoretically and practically to strengthening the enforcement of environmental criminal law in the context of sustainable environmental protection.