Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah ETERNAL: English Teaching Journal
Fadilla, Hilda
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Effect of Learning Models Children Learning in Science (CLIS) on Student Learning Outcomes in History Subjects Class X11 SMA Negeri 1 Montasik Fadilla, Hilda; Nurasiah, Nurasiah; Kesuma, T. Bahagia Bahagia
JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 10, No 2 (2025): Mei, Virtual reality in teacher education: Innovations, opportunities, and chal
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jimps.v10i2.33471

Abstract

Abstract: This research aims to find out the application of the Children Learning In Science (CLIS) learning model in class XII of SMA Negeri 1 Montasik, and to find out how much influence the Children Learning In Science (CLIS) learning model has on the learning outcomes of class XII students at SMA Negeri 1 Montasik. This research uses a quantitative approach with a type of Pre-experimental design research, in the form of one group pretest posttest design where there is only one group. The population in this study is all students in class XII which is 5 Class. The sample in this study is students in class XII.IPA3 which totals 33 Students. The sampling technique in this study uses Purposive sampling technique. The In data analysis techniques using tests Normality, homogeneity test, and t-test are two average differences. Average value result Before using the Children Learning In Science (CLIS) learning model, which is 60 is categorized as enough and after being given the average student score treatment, which is 80 is categorized as good, this proves that there is a significant change in the student's learning results. Based on the results of the thitung test ttabel or 17,399 2,039 at the significance level of = 5% (0,05), then HO is rejected and Ha is accepted or there is a real (significant) effect on student learning results before and after using the Children Learning In Science (CLIS) learning model in History subjects. Thus, the use of the Children Learning In Science (CLIS) learning model affects the learning results of History students in class XII.IPA3 at SMA Negeri 1 Montasik.
Discourse Markers in the Introductory Section of Research Articles in National accredited Journal Fadilla, Hilda; Widhiyanto; Wahyuni , Sri
ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, FPBS, Universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/eternal.v16i1.1171

Abstract

Discourse markers provide writers with signaling devices to connect ideas and guide readers in grasping the connection of ideas in the texts. An introductory section of a journal article represents a unique text which should be written with clear and interconnected arguments. This paper aims to reveal how discourse markers play vital roles in realizing the development of the arguments in this knotty text.  To achieve this, introductory sections of articles published in a nationally accredited journal were examined. Using Fraser's (2009) functional classes of discourse markers, 22 introduction sections were analyzed employing text analysis to determine the usage of these markers. It was found that despite employing all types of discourse markers, not all of them were applied appropriately. Their uses may not be in line with their functional classification. Among others, there are three functional classes of discourse markers proposed by Fraser (2009), they are contrastive markers, elaborative markers, and inferential markers. Elaborative markers were the most used type among the different types, followed by contrastive and inferential markers. This implies that authors tended to develop ideas more often, whereas contrastive and inferential markers were used less frequently but were crucial for indicating differences and making conclusions within the texts.
Co-Authors Desi Surlitasari Dewi Kesuma, T. Bahagia Bahagia Nurasiah Nurasiah W, Widhiyanto Wahyuni , Sri Widhiyanto