Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Anisah Friti Anjelia
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGARUH REGULASI KETENAGAKERJAAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA TERHADAP KESEJAHTERAAN PEREMPUAN DAN PENGURANGAN KESENJANGAN GENDER Anisah Friti Anjelia; Nabila Inkha Putri; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v7i5.6882

Abstract

Indonesia menghadapi berbagai tantangan dalam sektor ketenagakerjaan, terutama terkait dengan kesejahteraan dan kesetaraan gender. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi bagaimana Pengaruh Regulasi Ketenagakerjaan terhadap Kesejahteraan Perempuan dan tantangan implementasi UU Cipta Kerja terhadap perempuan pekerja serta mengevaluasi apakah regulasi ini sudah mendukung upaya pengurangan kesenjangan gender di sektor ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian normatif. Regulasi ketenagakerjaan dalam UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan PP No. 35 Tahun 2021 memberikan dampak positif terhadap kesejahteraan pekerja perempuan. Peningkatan hak cuti, fleksibilitas jam kerja, dan perlindungan terhadap pekerja perempuan, termasuk cuti haid dan cuti melahirkan, memberikan ruang bagi perempuan untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara pekerjaan dan peran domestik.
Selektivitas Penuntutan Kejahatan Internasional dalam Praktik Peradilan Global: Studi Kasus Penanganan Kejahatan Perang oleh International Criminal Court Anisah Friti Anjelia; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9689

Abstract

The issue of selectivity in the prosecution of international crimes remains a crucial problem in the global criminal justice system. The establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) through the Rome Statute aims to enforce accountability and eliminate impunity for perpetrators of serious international crimes, particularly war crimes, but in its implementation the ICC is often considered not to have applied law enforcement evenly. This study aims to examine the characteristics of selectivity in the prosecution of war crimes by the ICC, the factors that influence it, and its impact on the legitimacy of global justice. This study employed a normative legal method with statutory and case analysis approaches. The results of the study show that selectivity in prosecution is influenced by limitations in jurisdictional authority, the application of the principle of complementarity, the ICC’s dependence on state cooperation, and international political dynamics, especially those related to the role of the United Nations Security Council. These conditions are reflected in the tendency for case handling to focus on certain regions and countries, while similar alleged violations involving countries with major political influence are rarely processed to the prosecution stage. These findings indicate that selectivity in prosecution has implications for declining trust in the ICC and has the potential to weaken the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement. Thus, this study affirms that the legitimacy of global criminal justice depends greatly on consistency, independence, and equality in the enforcement of international law.
Co-Authors Dwi Putri Lestarika Nabila Inkha Putri