Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGARUH REGULASI KETENAGAKERJAAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA TERHADAP KESEJAHTERAAN PEREMPUAN DAN PENGURANGAN KESENJANGAN GENDER Anisah Friti Anjelia; Nabila Inkha Putri; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v7i5.6882

Abstract

Indonesia menghadapi berbagai tantangan dalam sektor ketenagakerjaan, terutama terkait dengan kesejahteraan dan kesetaraan gender. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi bagaimana Pengaruh Regulasi Ketenagakerjaan terhadap Kesejahteraan Perempuan dan tantangan implementasi UU Cipta Kerja terhadap perempuan pekerja serta mengevaluasi apakah regulasi ini sudah mendukung upaya pengurangan kesenjangan gender di sektor ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian normatif. Regulasi ketenagakerjaan dalam UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan PP No. 35 Tahun 2021 memberikan dampak positif terhadap kesejahteraan pekerja perempuan. Peningkatan hak cuti, fleksibilitas jam kerja, dan perlindungan terhadap pekerja perempuan, termasuk cuti haid dan cuti melahirkan, memberikan ruang bagi perempuan untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara pekerjaan dan peran domestik.
Sanksi terhadap Lembaga Peradilan Internasional sebagai Bentuk Obstruction of Justice dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Nabila Inkha Putri; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9901

Abstract

The increasing practice of unilateral sanctions imposed by states against the International Criminal Court (ICC) has the potential to disrupt the independence and effectiveness of international judicial institutions. From the perspective of international criminal law, such actions raise serious issues because they may be qualified as obstruction of justice, namely acts that impede judicial proceedings. This study aims to analyze whether sanctions against the ICC can be qualified as obstruction of justice and to examine the mechanisms of legal accountability for such actions within the framework of international law. This study used a normative legal method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used included the 1998 Rome Statute, the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), and various relevant international legal literature. The results showed that the concept of obstruction of justice in international criminal law has been regulated through provisions that criminalize acts interfering with the administration of justice. Sanctions against the ICC meet the three elements of obstruction of justice, namely causing delays in legal proceedings by paralyzing court operations, being carried out with full knowledge of the impact of such actions, and aiming to interfere with the administration of justice to protect citizens from criminal accountability. This action violates the principle of judicial independence, creates impunity, and leaves victims without access to justice. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of strengthening protection for international justice through the activation of blocking statutes and the solidarity of States Parties in order to safeguard the independence, effectiveness, and legitimacy of the International Criminal Court.