Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Keadilan Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Cahyadewi, Bertha
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN KODE ETIK HAKIM DALAM PROSEDUR PENGAJUAN PERMOHONAN PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN (Studi Putusan No. 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024) Cahyadewi, Bertha; Ambarwati, Mega Dewi
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 8 No. 5 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v8i5.7504

Abstract

Tahap persiapan Pemilu 2024, diduga adanya pelanggaran administrasi dengan hadirnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 sehingga menimbulkan dugaan adanya konflik kepentingan atau conflict of interest. Hal ini diduga putusan tersebut tidak sesuai dengan fungsi dari Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga yang independen hingga mempengaruhi keberlangsungan Pilpres. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana 1) penerapan kode etik hakim dalam prosedur pengajuan permohonan pemilihan presiden; 2) mengetahui peran Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MKMK) dalam menangani perkara pelanggaran kode etik oleh hakim konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang digunakan untuk menganalisis berbagai aturan hukum yang relevan dengan topik yang dibahas dengan melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu dalam Putusan MKMK Nomor 02/MKMK/L/11/2023, menyatakan bahwa Anwar Usman diberikan sanksi berupa pemberhentian dari jabatannya sebagai Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi karena melanggar kode etik. Namun dalam Putusan Nomor 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024, adapun pendapat berbeda atau dissenting opinion dari hakim seperti memberi syarat bahwa ia dalam melaksanakan tugasnya berdasarkan prinsip-kode etik hakim, yakni prinsip independensi (independence), prinsip ketidakberpihakan (impartiality), prinsip integritas (integrity), prinsip kepantasan dan kesopanan (propriety), prinsip kesetaraan (equality), prinsip kecakapan dan keseksamaan (competence and diligence) dan prinsip kearifan dan kebijaksanaan (wisdom).Kata Kunci: Hakim; Kode Etik; Mahkamah Konstitusi
Right to be Forgotten vs. Public Information Disclosure to Public Officials in Indonesia Cahyadewi, Bertha; Wiwik Afifah
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): Februari 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v19i1.132922

Abstract

The advancement of information technology, which renders digital footprints permanent, has generated new problems in the protection of personal data, including for public officials who possess narrower privacy boundaries than private citizens. Research aims to explore the potential conflicts between the right to be forgotten and long-standing principle of transparency in Article 28F of the 1945 Republic of Indonesia's Constitution. Additionally, this paper looks at which public servants should be protected by the Right to Forget Law under Indonesian national laws or administrative regulations. This research deals with the difference between Indonesian National Laws for public servants and the right to be forgotten. It also discusses laws from “Republic of Indonesia No. 19/2016 Electronic Information Transactions Law of Republic of Indonesia No. 14/2008 Disclosure of Public Information Laws”. EU policy as well as the direction taken in member states such as France. The findings of the research show that the applicability of the Right to be Forgotten for public servants cannot be in an absolute form since information about their tasks of offices, track records, alleged ethical or legal violations, and actions that have an impact on the public is information that must remain accessible as part of public accountability. Additionally, this research reveals discrepancies in the court's and the Information Commission's authority when it comes to responding to information removal requests, which may lead to jurisdictional disputes.  In conclusion, the public interest must be considered when evaluating any use of the Right to be Forgotten by public officials. Considering the proportionality principle and regulatory harmonization is required to sustain transparent and accountable government by ensuring the proper finding a balance between protecting people's privacy and giving the public the right to know.
Co-Authors Ambarwati, Mega Dewi wiwik afifah