Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Hukum Statuta
Muhammad Abdul Aziz Hasibuan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISA TERHADAP PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI TANAH DI BAWAH TANGAN PADA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR : 152/Pdt.G/2021/PN Bks Putri Kinanti; Rafi Rangga Saputra; Chris Matthew Tobing; Indah Kusuma Wardani; Muhammad Abdul Aziz Hasibuan; Alya Rahmawati; Mauladiana Qibtiya; Melisa Nurjaya; Wardani Rizkianti
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 8 No. 7 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v8i7.7560

Abstract

A private land sale and purchase agreement is a written contract between two parties without the involvement of an authorized public official. Although legally, a private land sale and purchase agreement meets the requirements set out in Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code, which governs the legal validity of contracts, such an agreement carries significant consequences in terms of proof and may be subject to challenges regarding its validity. This study aims to examine, analyze, and address the validity of private land sale and purchase agreements under the provisions of named contracts as regulated in the Indonesian Civil Code, the legal protection afforded to the parties involved in such agreements, and the evidentiary mechanisms for resolving disputes arising from private land sale and purchase transactions. The findings of this research reveal that, while the sale is substantively valid, in terms of agrarian legal formalities, a private land sale and purchase agreement is not considered fully complete, as it is not executed through a Land Deed Official (PPAT) deed. Therefore, to protect the parties involved in a private land sale and purchase agreement, it is essential to strengthen the agreement through proper legal authorization.
PERBANDINGAN KONSEP SURAT UTANG NEGARA DAN SURAT BERHARGA SYARIAH NEGARA DALAM MENJAMIN KEPASTIAN PEMBAYARAN Indah Kusuma Wardani; Nadia Marsya Ramdhani; Muhammad Abdul Aziz Hasibuan
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Volume 5, Nomor 2, April 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The study examines a comparison of the concepts of Government Bonds and Sharia Government Securities in ensuring payment certainty and evaluates the regulatory framework for guarantees of government debt repayment in preventing default disputes. This study employs a normative legal research method using the statute approach, the case approach, the comparative approach, and the conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that SUN are debt instruments whose principal and interest payments are guaranteed by the state through the State Budget (APBN), whereas SBSN are securities based on Sharia principles supported by underlying assets, Sharia contracts, and a trustee mechanism. From the perspective of legal certainty, SBSN have a stronger protective structure because they rely not only on state guarantees but also on the underlying assets that are the subject of the transaction. Meanwhile, in the case of legacy bonds, differing interpretations regarding maturity and repayment obligations indicate that inconsistent regulations can lead to legal disputes. Thus, SBSN are considered to provide greater legal certainty and minimize the risk of default compared to SUN.
Co-Authors Alya Rahmawati Chris Matthew Tobing Indah Kusuma Wardani Indah Kusuma Wardani Mauladiana Qibtiya Melisa Nurjaya Nadia Marsya Ramdhani Putri Kinanti Rafi Rangga Saputra Rizkianti, Wardani