Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Rakhmawati, Catur Septiana
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Implikasi Pasal 20 dan 21 Undang Undang No. 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi terhadap Bank dalam Pemrosesan Data Biometrik Nasabah Syarifah, Annisa; Ananda, Alya; Azzahra, Zaskia; Rakhmawati, Catur Septiana; Nurjihad
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 JULI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pembukaan rekening bank seringkali mengharuskan nasabah memberikan data pribadi, termasuk data biometrik. Penelitian ini menyoroti dua masalah utama: Bagaimana implikasi Pasal 20 dan Pasal 21 Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi terhadap bank dalam pemrosesan data biometrik nasabah, serta urgensi kepatuhan tersebut terkait hak privasi individu. Metode penelitian normatif digunakan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bank belum mematuhi Pasal 20 dan 21 UU PDP. Bank tidak meminta izin eksplisit dari nasabah sesuai Pasal 20 UU PDP dan tidak memberikan informasi lengkap sesuai Pasal 21 UU PDP, seperti legalitas, tujuan pemrosesan, jenis data, jangka waktu retensi, rincian informasi, jangka waktu pemrosesan, dan hak subjek data. Kepatuhan terhadap Pasal 20 dan 21 UU PDP penting untuk melindungi keamanan data nasabah, menghormati hak privasi, dan menjaga kepercayaan nasabah terhadap bank
Disclosure Principle as Ex-Ante Rules for Combating Big Tech’s Abuse of Dominance in Digital Market: A Comparative Analysis Rakhmawati, Catur Septiana
PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW) Vol 11, No 2 (2024): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study discusses the weaknesses of Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in handling the abuse of dominance by big tech in the digital market. This study also explores lessons from how the European Union (EU) and Japan implement the disclosure principle to prevent such abuse. This normative study employs statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings are as follows: first, Law Number 5 of 1999 does not implement ex-ante measures such as the “disclosure principle,” and prevention efforts are practically non-existent, particularly in handling dominance abuse. Second, a comparative study of the EU and Japan found that the EU has enacted the Digital Markets Act (DMA), which comprehensively regulates the abuse of dominance by big tech companies and categorizes them as gatekeepers. The DMA establishes the gatekeeper threshold and includes the duty to notify the European Commission voluntarily under Articles 5, 6, and 7 of the DMA. Japan has the Act on Improving Transparency and Fairness of Digital Platforms 2021, an ex-ante regulation that implements the disclosure principles on digital platforms. Based on these two comparisons, the main idea of such regulations is to implement the disclosure principle as an ex-ante rule for business actors who meet the threshold and to burden them with certain obligations. This approach allows authorities to perform supervision and prevent abuse of dominance by big tech optimally.
HARMONISASI DIRECT LICENSING DAN COLLECTIVE LICENSING ATAS PERFORMING RIGHTS DI INDONESIA Baity, Sheila Noor; Rakhmawati, Catur Septiana
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.2, 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol8.iss2.art5

Abstract

This study aims to address two legal issues: First, the weaknesses in the Copyright Law and its implementing regulations regarding the application of direct licensing—particularly for performing rights—with a focus on the subjects, licensing system, and the role of Collective Management Organizations (LMK) and the National Collective Management Organization (LMKN). Second, efforts to harmonize the regulation of direct and collective licensing in Indonesia by comparing the legal frameworks for direct licensing in the United States and Australia. This is a normative legal study that relies on secondary data and employs qualitative analysis. The findings reveal that the regulatory weaknesses in Indonesia concerning direct licensing include the unclear identification of royalty recipients, the absence of a recognized licensing system, and the provisions governing LMKN and LMK under the Government Regulation on Royalties (PP Royalti), which effectively nullify the right to direct licensing as stipulated in the Copyright Law. This study proposes several recommendations for harmonizing the regulation of direct and collective licensing in Indonesia: First, clarifying the legal subjects entitled to royalties in the Copyright Law by clearly defining the terms “any person” and “user.” Second, harmonizing relevant regulations, particularly Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021. Third, improving the role of LMKN either as a regulator and mediator or by delegating its implementation to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI).
Co-Authors Ananda, Alya Azzahra, Zaskia Baity, Sheila Noor Nurjihad Syarifah, Annisa