Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Vocational Studies on Applied Research Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum Siyasah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Mulyaningsih, Rizki
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
DIVERSI DALAM PENEGAKKAN HUKUM IN CONCRETO (PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM) Arafat, Muhammad; Tono, Sidik; Mulyaningsih, Rizki
Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum (JISYAKU) Vol 3 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/jisyaku.v3i2.9226

Abstract

The enforcement of in concreto law refers to the practical implementation of law, transforming it from an abstract concept into a concrete application. Diversion, as an alternative resolution for juvenile cases outside the formal criminal justice system, aims to prevent stigmatization and allows children to reintegrate into their social environment in a balanced manner. This study employs a library research method with a juridical-normative approach, collecting data through documentation and analyzing it descriptively. The findings reveal that restorative justice and diversion focus on restoring losses suffered by victims, providing opportunities for offenders to participate in the recovery process, and involving the community in maintaining equitable peace. However, despite the extensive discussion of restorative justice and diversion in existing literature, there remains a gap in integrating Islamic legal principles, particularly As-sulh, into their application for juvenile cases. This raises two main questions: how can the concept of diversion be aligned with the principles of As-sulh to support the protection of children
Utilization of Alurities Trisperma Oil as Biodiesel Sari, Gustry Ratna; Satrio, M. Akbar; Mulyaningsih, Rizki; Irene, Imer Ayu; Paramita, Vita
Journal of Vocational Studies on Applied Research 2020: JVSAR, Volume 2 Issue 1 Year 2020 (April 2020)
Publisher : Vocational College of Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (472.812 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/jvsar.v2i1.7677

Abstract

Biodiesel is one of the solutions to the many uses of fossil fuels. Biodiesel itself is a fuel derived from vegetable oil (plant or vegetable fat) called biofuel. In this study, biodiesel used is based on sunan candlenut. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimum time conditions (1.5; 2; 2.5 hours) and the comparison of solvents with candlenut (0.25; 0.2; 0.17) in the manufacture of candlenut oil, as well as knowing the process of making biodiesel. The method used is the manufacture of hazelnut oil by extraction using Soxhlet. The resulting oil was esterified using methanol with sulfuric acid catalyst at a reaction temperature of 60 0C for 60 minutes. The volume ratio between oil and methanol is 4: 1 followed by transesterification at 50 0C for 30 minutes. In the research, the results were optimum time and the number of solvents for good extraction at 2 hours and the ratio of solvents to hazelnut was 0.17. The resulting biodiesel density was 0.82 gr / ml, viscosity was 4.07Cp, FFA value was 1.4%, and the saponification rate was 274.4. From these data it can be said that the Biodiesel produced is approaching the Indonesian National Standard.
Kebebasan Berpendapat sebagai Hak Konstitusional: Tinjauan terhadap Praktik Penanganan Aksi Demonstrasi Arafat, Muhammad; Mulyaningsih, Rizki
Siyasah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Siyasah Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Publisher : UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/8d8xc120

Abstract

Ketegangan inheren antara kebebasan berpendapat yang dijamin konstitusi dan kewajiban negara untuk menjaga ketertiban umum merupakan tantangan utama di negara demokrasi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisis yuridis mendalam terhadap kerangka hukum yang mengatur demonstrasi di Indonesia serta faktor-faktor sistemik yang berkontribusi pada dilema yang dihadapi aparat penegak hukum. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus, analisis ini mengungkap adanya kesenjangan signifikan (das sein vs. das sollen) antara kerangka hukum yang canggih dan protektif terhadap hak (UUD 1945, UU No. 9/1998, Perkap No. 7/2012) dengan implementasinya di lapangan yang sering kali diwarnai oleh tindakan represif yang mengabaikan asas proporsionalitas dan nesesitas. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penggunaan doktrin keseimbangan kepentingan dan proporsionalitas sebagai lensa analisis utama untuk mendekonstruksi "dilema" aparat, dengan membingkainya kembali sebagai kegagalan penerapan hukum alih-alih sebuah paradoks yang tak terpecahkan. Kesimpulannya, dilema aparat diperparah oleh isu sistemik, termasuk budaya impunitas dan akuntabilitas yang lemah, yang secara kolektif melanggengkan siklus kekerasan dalam aksi demonstrasi.
Co-Authors Arafat, Muhammad Irene, Imer Ayu Sari, Gustry Ratna Satrio, M. Akbar Sidik Tono Vita Paramita