Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal YUSTISI Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal)
Wahyu Nathasia
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DI INDONESIA Ragil Surya Prakasa; Wahyu Nathasia; Royhan Daffa Isramsir; Muhammad Nur Arifin; Alyssa Sabrina
YUSTISI Vol 10 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v10i3.18618

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam hukum pidana di Indonesia masih bersifat mendua. Hal ini terjadi karena di dalam KUHP subyek hukum pidana hanyalah manusia, korporasi tidak diakui sebagai subyek hukum pidana. Sementara Undang-undang di luar KUHP telah mengakomodasi bahwa korporasi juga merupakan subyek hukum pidana, sehingga bila korporasi melakukan tindak pidana dapat dimintai pertanggungjawabannya. Dalam Rancangan KUHP baru (Konsep KUHP), korporasi telah diakomodasi sebagai subyek hukum pidana, namun hingga kini konsep itu belum disahkan untuk berlakunya.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dan bagaimana penerapan sanksi terhadap korporasi menurut peraturan perundangundangan di Indonesia dalam upaya memberikan perlindungan terhadap korban kejahatan. Kata kunci: PertanggungjawabanKorporasi
SISTEM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DI INDONESIA Ragil Surya Prakasa; Wahyu Nathasia; Royhan Daffa Isramsir; Muhammad Nur Arifin; Alyssa Sabrina
YUSTISI Vol 10 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v10i3.18618

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam hukum pidana di Indonesia masih bersifat mendua. Hal ini terjadi karena di dalam KUHP subyek hukum pidana hanyalah manusia, korporasi tidak diakui sebagai subyek hukum pidana. Sementara Undang-undang di luar KUHP telah mengakomodasi bahwa korporasi juga merupakan subyek hukum pidana, sehingga bila korporasi melakukan tindak pidana dapat dimintai pertanggungjawabannya. Dalam Rancangan KUHP baru (Konsep KUHP), korporasi telah diakomodasi sebagai subyek hukum pidana, namun hingga kini konsep itu belum disahkan untuk berlakunya.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dan bagaimana penerapan sanksi terhadap korporasi menurut peraturan perundangundangan di Indonesia dalam upaya memberikan perlindungan terhadap korban kejahatan. Kata kunci: PertanggungjawabanKorporasi
ANALYSIS OF AUTOMATIC EXECUTION IN BLOCKCHAIN-BASED SMART CONTRACTS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM OF CONTRACT Wahyu Nathasia; Rahmayani, Nuzul
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18491849

Abstract

The principle of freedom of contract, as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Civil Code, affirms that legally formed agreements bind the parties as law. This principle grants contractual autonomy to determine the formation, parties, and content of agreements, provided they do not violate statutory law, public order, or morality. However, such freedom is limited by the principles of good faith, fairness, proportionality, and the protection of weaker parties.The development of blockchain technology has introduced smart contracts as automatically executed electronic agreements based on pre-programmed code. Legally, smart contracts may be considered valid contracts insofar as they fulfill the requirements of Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code and comply with the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions. Digital consent, such as authorization through a digital wallet, constitutes a legitimate expression of agreement.Smart contracts represent a modern manifestation of freedom of contract by enabling automated performance without third-party intervention, reflecting the prior intention of the parties embedded in blockchain-based code. Their application on platforms such as Stellar Lumens (XLM) demonstrates practical implementation in cryptocurrency transactions. Nevertheless, legal challenges remain, including regulatory gaps, transaction anonymity, technological inequality, and potential imbalances in bargaining power. Therefore, adaptive legal regulation is essential to ensure legal certainty, fairness, and effective legal protection.
Co-Authors Alyssa Sabrina Muhammad Nur Arifin Ragil Surya Prakasa Rahmayani, Nuzul Royhan Daffa Isramsir