Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ensiklopedia of Journal JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
Angelia, Rina Rahma Ornella
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL ANTARA PENGUSAHA DENGAN PEKERJA (ANALISIS PUTUSAN NO. 1/PDT.SUS-PHI/2022/PN PDG) Angelia, Rina Rahma Ornella; Desmon, Andi; Rahmi, Rahmi
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): Vol. 7 No. 3 Edisi 2 April 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v7i3.3160

Abstract

Abstract: Termination of Employment (PHK) refers to the end of an employment relationship as regulated in Indonesian labor law. Dismissal may occur for various reasons, including company efficiency. This article analyzes Decision No. 1/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022/PN Pdg using a normative juridical approach and qualitative analysis of secondary data. The dispute was first mediated by the Manpower Office but failed, leading to litigation in the Industrial Relations Court. The judges divided their considerations into exceptions, provisional claims, and the main case. They rejected the exception and the provisional claim, declaring the dismissal legally valid. The recognized period of employment was limited to six months due to the legal separation of two companies. Out of eight claims, three were granted, four rejected, and one set aside.Keywords: Termination of Employment; Industrial Relations Dispute.
Pemeriksaan Setempat Oleh Hakim Dalam Perkara Pidana Desmon, Andi; Angelia, Rina Rahma Ornella; Erwin, Rahmi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i1.6805

Abstract

Research on local examinations by judges in criminal cases aims to find out and obtain a comprehensive picture regarding local examinations by judges in criminal cases. This research is important to do, because in the development of judicial practice in Indonesia, local examinations conducted by judges are not only carried out on civil cases, but are also practiced in the settlement of criminal cases. Even though the Criminal Procedure Code does not regulate local examinations in the verification process carried out by judges in criminal cases. Implicitly the Criminal Procedure Code only regulates reconstruction or reconstruction activities carried out by investigation at the investigative stage. This research is a legal research using bid-invitation approach and case approach. Based on the results of the research, it was concluded that local examinations by judges in criminal cases are the judge's discretion to clarify and validate a piece of evidence to find legal facts, which aims to increase the judge's confidence in giving a decision on a criminal case being examined. The discretionary authority possessed by judges in carrying out local examinations in criminal cases is facultative, meaning that it is not a priori binding and is only complementary, the implementation of which depends on the judge's judgment. Legally, a local examination by a judge in a criminal case is part of the evidence in the judicial process. Therefore theoretically included in the law of evidence. Penelitian tentang pemeriksaan setempat oleh Hakim dalam perkara pidana bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memperoleh suatu gambaran yang komprehensif terkait pemeriksaan setempat oleh Hakim dalam perkara pidana. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan, karena dalam perkembangan praktek peradilan di Indonesia, pemeriksaan setempat yang dilakukan oleh Hakim tidak hanya dilakukan terhadap perkara perdata saja, namun juga dipraktikkan dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana. Padahal KUHAP tidak mengatur tentang pemeriksaan setempat dalam proses pembuktian yang dilakukan oleh Hakim dalam perkara pidana. Secara implisit KUHAP hanya mengatur kegiatan rekonstruksi atau reka ulang yang dilakukan oleh penyidik pada tahap penyidikan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa pemeriksaan setempat oleh Hakim dalam perkara pidana merupakan diskresi Hakim untuk mengklarifikasi dan menvalidasi suatu alat bukti guna menemukan fakta hukum, yang bertujuan untuk menambah keyakinan hakim dalam memberikan putusan terhadap perkara pidana yang sedang diperiksa. Kewenangan diskresi yang dimiliki oleh hakim dalam melakukan pemeriksaan setempat dalam perkara pidana bersifat fakultatif, artinya tidak secara apriori mengikat dan hanya bersifat sebagai pelengkap, yang pelaksanaannya tergantung dari penilaian Hakim. Secara hukum, pemeriksaan setempat oleh Hakim dalam perkara pidana merupakan bagian dari pembuktian dalam proses persidangan. Karenanya secara teoretis masuk dalam hukum pembuktian.Diskresi; Pembuktian; Pemeriksaan Setempat.  .
JAMINAN SOSIAL SEBAGAI HAK KONSTITUSIONAL: KETIDAKSETARAAN PERLINDUNGAN PEKERJA INFORMAL DI INDONESIA Angelia, Rina Rahma Ornella; Fitria, Yenni; Desmon, Andi
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): Vol. 8 No. 2 Edisi 3 Januari 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v8i2.3705

Abstract

Social security is a constitutional right inherent in every citizen and is guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. As a state based on law that adheres to the principles of a welfare state, Indonesia has a constitutional obligation to provide a fair, inclusive, and non-discriminatory social security system for all workers. However, in its implementation, disparities in social security protection between formal and informal workers persist. This article aims to analyze the position of social security as a constitutional right within Indonesia’s national legal system and to identify the legal and policy measures undertaken by the government to address such disparities. This study employs a normative juridical research method using statutory and conceptual approaches through an examination of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that inequality in social security protection for informal workers is influenced by several factors, including unstable income conditions, limited regulations specifically governing the legal status of informal workers, low levels of social security literacy, as well as administrative and bureaucratic barriers in the participation process. Therefore, strengthening explicit regulatory frameworks, adjusting contribution payment schemes to be more flexible, and enhancing public outreach alongside simplifying administrative procedures are necessary to achieve equitable social security protection in accordance with constitutional mandates. Keyword: Social security, constitutional rights, informal workers, BPJS Employment, social justice
Co-Authors Andi Desmon Erwin, Rahmi Rahmi Rahmi Yenni Fitria