Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

UNDERSTANDING THE MECHANISM OF JOINT PROPERTY DIVISION: RIGHTS OF HUSBAND AND WIFE ACCORDING TO MARRIAGE LAW IN INDONESIA Royani, Esti; Kamaluddin; Sarikun; Isnawati; Syamsudin
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1519

Abstract

The mechanism for dividing joint assets in marriage law in Indonesia still occurs due to differences in its implementation. Court decisions often rely on consideration of financial contributions, but non-financial contributions are not properly recognized. Inaccuracies in judges' decisions and the lack of public understanding of the law are the main factors influencing the uncertainty of the division of joint assets after divorce. This study aims to analyze the mechanism of division of joint property in marriage law in Indonesia and identify the factors that influence the process. The focus of this study is to examine financial and non-financial contributions considered in court decisions, and differences in legal interpretation can affect the results of the division of joint assets. This study uses empirical research methods with qualitative and quantitative approaches. A total of 30 divorce cases have been analyzed in district courts and religious courts to understand the pattern of division of joint assets in legal practice. The results of the study show that although most court decisions prioritize financial contributions in the division of joint assets, non-financial contributions have not been estimated. Other influencing factors are property owners, access to legal examination, and recognition of two rights. More comprehensive rules and regulations are needed for the distribution of joint assets. An important step towards a fair and transparent legal system is the reform of the judicial system and legal training for married couples.
Legal Protection of Users Wallet Electronic or E-Wallet Benhard Kurniawan P; Irman Syahriar; Sarikun
International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): July-December
Publisher : PT Inovasi Pratama Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/ijere.v2i2.700

Abstract

System payment through this online medium using electronic money as the payment tool. Drafts from electronic money This is payment in a modern way, that is, without There is physique the money or called with term cashless money. Then appear wallet electronic, or the current one known with the term e-wallet, that can be installed on a smartphone. Based on Bank Indonesia Regulation Article 1 Number 7 concerning Maintenance Processing Transaction Payment Number 18/40/PBI/2016, a container medium-based functional electronics can be equalized with place-saving electronic money as one of the methods of payment. Cannot be denied with existing payment through This e-wallet is very convenient in transactions, but it can also give rise to a new problem that can harm consumers as user e-wallet consequences lack of attention from perpetrator business e-wallet only important for getting profit. The writing method used in compiling papers This is method observation, that is, collecting data via purposeful observation to multiply references. Then method References, that is, use sources library, like books, articles, and so on. Constitution Protection: Consumers expected a capable law to give certainty to e-wallets. As a form of responsibility answer for losses that have been experienced by consumers, the perpetrator of business e-wallets has an obligation to give change, make a loss, and provide equal compensation for losses received by consumers. There is an accountability answer. This as form effort for grow return impact positive consumer to use e-wallet in do transaction electronic.
Legal Innovation in Religious Courts: The Potential Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Resolving Contemporary Cases Sukindar; Hendrik Kusnianto; Sarikun; Benhard Kurniawan Pasaribu; Muhd Syahazizamir bin Sahmat
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v3i2.8199

Abstract

Religious courts face complex challenges in resolving contemporary cases, such as marital disputes, inheritance distribution, and conflicts in Sharia-based economic matters. In the digital era, Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers innovative solutions to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of legal processes. This study employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach to explore the potential use of AI in religious courts. Data was collected through literature reviews and document analysis, focusing on AI applications in inheritance calculations based on Islamic faraidh law, virtual dispute mediation, and Sharia contract analysis. The analysis follows the Miles and Huberman framework, involving data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. Data validation was carried out through source triangulation to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the findings. The research findings reveal that AI can support digitalizing legal processes in religious courts, such as managing electronic documents, predicting rulings based on legal precedents, and monitoring compliance with sharia principles. Additionally, AI can potentially improve the efficiency of dispute mediation through digital platforms and facilitate automated inheritance calculations in line with Islamic law. However, implementing AI presents challenges, including inadequate regulations, potential algorithmic bias, and compatibility with Islamic legal values. This study’s academic contribution provides a new perspective on integrating modern technology with Islamic law, particularly within the religious court system. The findings are expected to serve as a foundation for developing strategic policies to support AI implementation in Islamic legal systems, addressing societal needs in the contemporary era.