Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERBANDINGAN ANTARA SRPMK DAN SISTEM GANDA PADA GEDUNG RUMAH SAKIT GIGI MULUT UNIVERSITAS UDAYANA I Gusti, angganawibawa; Sarassantika, I Putu Ellsa; Ida Ayu Cri Vinantya Laksmi; I Wayan Gde Erick Triswandana; I Putu Deny Surastika Aditama
Jurnal Rekayasa Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan - CENTECH Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Rekayasa Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Oktober 2024, ISSN 2722-0230 (Onli
Publisher : UKI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33541/cen.v5i2.6100

Abstract

Bali is one of the provinces that are destinations for foreign and domestic tourists. This causes Bali to follow developments in several sectors, one of which is the construction sector. Of course, every building in Bali must guarantee its safety and comfort. Especially in infrastructure buildings, the security of which must be guaranteed because it involves the safety of many people inside. For example, hospital buildings included in risk category IV need to pay attention to their deviations. For example, in the Udayana University oral dental hospital building which was previously planned using SRPMK, the design deviation value met the requirements or did not exceed the permit deviation. This oral dental hospital building will be re-planned using a dual system. So these two structural systems are chosen for comparison regarding the deviation values ​​between the two to provide information regarding which structural system is more optimal. In this writing, the analysis shows that the deviation value produced by the dual system is smaller than the special moment resisting frame system. Namely, with a maximum value of the double system of 8.96 mm and SRPMK with a maximum value of 21.696 mm with a clearance of 30.77 mm on the 2nd floor in the x direction and in the Y direction the maximum value of the double system is 12.60mm and SRPMK with the The maximum value is 20.07 mm with a permit of 26.92 mm on the 3rd floor.
ALTERNATIF DESAIN GEDUNG GUESTWING 1 THE RITZ CARLTON HOTTEL DENGAN SISTEM GANDA I Made, Anggi Prasetya; Sarassantika, I Putu Ellsa; Cokorda Agung Yujana; I Wayan Gde Erick Triswandan; I Putu Deny Surastika Aditama
Jurnal Rekayasa Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan - CENTECH Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Rekayasa Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Oktober 2024, ISSN 2722-0230 (Onli
Publisher : UKI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33541/cen.v5i2.6101

Abstract

When planning a tall building structure, the deviation due to lateral forces is very important to be taken into account in the planning of tall building structures. To reduce the amount of deviation in the structure adding by special structural elements, as shear walls. With the shear wall, can increase the stiffness of the building structure and absorb large shear forces along with higher the building structure and lateral force on structure will not fully accepted by frame structure which will result a decrease in deviation. Guestwing 1 The Ritz Carlton Hottel located in South Kuta District, Badung Regency, Bali. This building has a height of 20.2 m consisting of 6 floors. Planning with 2 models: a) SRPMK Existing Modeling, b) Dual System Model. Material specifications and loading are the same, just different in addition of shear walls and reducing the dimensions the building. Based on the results the analysis of the two models, the largest inter-storey deviation value in the existing model X=52.014mm; Y=47.960mm and for the dual system model X=25.614mm; Y=26.026mm. From the results of deviation analysis on both models, can be concluded that with addition of shear walls, there is a decrease in deviation 63.27% in X direction and 68.18% in Y direction. The most significant decrease occurs in dimensions and reinforcement of column K1 from size 350x800mm with 22 D22 reinforcement to column 300x600mm with 18 D22 reinforcement, beam B3 250x450mm for support area 17 D13 and field area 10 D13 to beam 250x400mm with the number of support reinforcement 11 D13, and the number of field reinforcement 7 D13. From the results of this planning can be used as a consideration for the construction of the next building for the use of shear walls in the structure.