Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

CHILDREN'S CAPABILITIES IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION THROUGH THE KKN PROGRAM OF UIN-SU STUDENTS IN TJ. IBUS VILLAGE Fakira, Qania Athaya; Mayesti, Sabila Amelia; Rahmadani, Suci; Sabrina, Aura; Nuh, Muhammad
PERSPEKTIF: Journal of Social and Library Science Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): December
Publisher : Academic Solution Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70489/rwjcec05

Abstract

Tanjung Ibus Village, which is located in Secanggang District, Langkat Regency, is an area with a strong religious life. However, the challenges in spreading religious education in rural areas such as Tanjung Ibus cannot be ignored. Limited access to educational resources, a lack of competent teaching staff, and a lack of facilities and infrastructure for religious education are obstacles that are often faced. The North Sumatra State Islamic University (UIN-SU) Real Work Lecture Program (KKN) with group code 124 took the initiative to make a real contribution through teaching and learning activities in Tanjung Ibus Village. This program not only aims to improve children's academic abilities, but also to strengthen their understanding of the teachings of their religion. There are several programs offered by KKN 124 Uinsu, namely, Teaching at MDA and teaching the Qur’an. The KKN student teaching program helps increase children's Islamic religious knowledge in Tanjung Ibus Village. Through interactive and fun learning methods, children can more easily understand basic religious concepts such as monotheism, fiqh, morals and Islamic history.
Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Jual Beli di Aplikasi E-Commerce sebagai Perbuatan Itikad Tidak Baik Berdasarkan KUH Perdata Fakira, Qania Athaya; Lubis, Syaddan Dintara
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v9i4.12089

Abstract

The transformation of digital technology and the development of the internet have revolutionized trade activities, one of them is through electronic commerce (e-commerce). This business model offers ease of transactions, time efficiency, and expanded market reach without geographical boundaries. However, this convenience raises legal issues, one of them is unilateral transaction cancellation by the buyer, particularly with the Cash on Delivery (COD) method. From the perspective of Indonesian civil law, unilateral cancellation without a valid reason constitutes a form of default and a violation of the principle of good faith as regulated in Clause 1338 verse (3) of the Civil Code. This study aims to identify legal provisions related to bad faith in unilateral cancellation and to analyze the forms of legal protection for sellers in e-commerce. This study uses a normative juridical research type with a statutory approach. Data collection techniques include literature studies, including primary legal materials such as the Civil Code, Clause No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, and Clause No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, as well as secondary and tertiary legal materials. The analysis method in this study is qualitative, conducted through an interpretation of the processed legal materials. The results show that unilateral cancellations, particularly in COD systems, cause losses for sellers both financially and non-financially, including damaged goods, repackaging costs, lost potential profits, and psychological stress. Legal protection for sellers includes the right to receive payment as agreed, protection from bad faith consumer actions, and the right to claim compensation under Clause 1243 of the Civil Code. Prevention efforts can be implemented practically, such as reporting to the platform and deactivating the COD option, or legally through lawsuits for breach of contract or unlawful acts. This study presents a novelty approach to the concept of bad faith, which can be considered to be unilateral cancellation.