Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Argopuro: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Bahasa Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan (JURRIPEN) Argopuro : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Bahasa
Sofa Nur Alfiah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
IRONY IN ANIMAL FARM BY GEORGE ORWELL Shidqi Fauzia Ruliff; Sofa Nur Alfiah; Fadly Yusuf Thoziry; Nurholis
Argopuro: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Bahasa Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Argopuro: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Bahasa
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.6734/argopuro.v6i3.9773

Abstract

This study discusses the use of irony in George Orwell’s Animal Farm, illustrating how Orwell engages various forms of irony to critique politics and human nature. Through three types of irony, specifically verbal, dramatic, and situational irony. The novel exposes the hypocrisy and corruption of the pigs, particularly in their manipulation of language and principles. Verbal irony that shows the exaggerated praises that showered the pigs. Also, the transformation of the pigs into a tyrant is shown as a powerful example of situational irony, while the animal’s blind acceptance of the pigs leadership deepens the dramatic irony, as the reader understands the truth behind the facade. This study also explores how the novel uses irony to critique the cynical nature of power and oppression. The research method of this study is a descriptive qualitative method. This data was obtained from the novel as the main source and research journals as supporting theories for this research.
IRONY IN ANIMAL FARM BY GEORGE ORWELL Shidqi Fauzia Ruliff; Sofa Nur Alfiah; Fadly Yusuf Thoziry; Nurholis
Argopuro: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Bahasa Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Argopuro: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Bahasa
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.6734/argopuro.v6i3.9773

Abstract

This study discusses the use of irony in George Orwell’s Animal Farm, illustrating how Orwell engages various forms of irony to critique politics and human nature. Through three types of irony, specifically verbal, dramatic, and situational irony. The novel exposes the hypocrisy and corruption of the pigs, particularly in their manipulation of language and principles. Verbal irony that shows the exaggerated praises that showered the pigs. Also, the transformation of the pigs into a tyrant is shown as a powerful example of situational irony, while the animal’s blind acceptance of the pigs leadership deepens the dramatic irony, as the reader understands the truth behind the facade. This study also explores how the novel uses irony to critique the cynical nature of power and oppression. The research method of this study is a descriptive qualitative method. This data was obtained from the novel as the main source and research journals as supporting theories for this research.
Studi Komparatif Konsep Tauhid dalam Mazhab Sunni dan Syiah: Analisis Teologis Lutfi Ahmad Mutorik; Disyela Apriswa Mandai; Sofa Nur Alfiah; Muhammad Raka Iqbal Fadil Muharom; Rifky Ali Perdiansyah; Muhammad Dzaky Maulana Putra; Dadan Firdaus
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU PENDIDIKAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Agustus : JURRIPEN : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurripen.v4i2.6108

Abstract

This study aims to comparatively analyze the concept of tawhid in Sunni and Shi'a Imamiyyah schools from a theological perspective. Using an exploratory qualitative approach and literature study method, this research examines the theological structures of both traditions, identifying points of convergence and key differences in their understanding of God's oneness. The findings reveal that although both traditions uphold tawhid as the core of faith, differing epistemological approaches and authoritative frameworks lead to significant distinctions. The Sunni tradition emphasizes three dimensions of tawhid—rububiyyah, uluhiyyah, and asma’ wa sifat—while the Shi’a Imamiyyah integrates the concept with the doctrines of imamah and walayah. The study further highlights that such theological diversity can enrich Islamic intellectual tradition and foster constructive inter-sectarian dialogue when managed inclusively. The research recommends promoting sectarian tolerance education and inter-traditional dialogue as key strategies to enhance Islamic unity.
Co-Authors Dadan Firdaus Disyela Apriswa Mandai Fadly Yusuf Thoziry Lutfi Ahmad Mutorik Muhammad Dzaky Maulana Putra Muhammad Raka Iqbal Fadil Muharom Nurholis Rifky Ali Perdiansyah Shidqi Fauzia Ruliff