Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MAHAKIM: Journal of Islamic Family Law Canonia Religia: Jurnal Studi Teks Agama dan Sosial
Ma'mun, Mohamad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Waris Beda Agama dalam Kitab Bidayatul Mujtahid Ma'mun, Mohamad
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 8 No 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v8i1.424

Abstract

In Islamic inheritance law, it has been explained in detail and clearly about the procedures for the distribution and transfer of inheritance to the heirs and the things that prevent the heirs from getting the inheritance from the heir. This prohibition is based on the hadith of the prophet. However, this law is not a single law, there are differences of opinion among scholars. This type of research is qualitative research, which in the study process used library material (library research) which examines library material related to Ibn Rushd's legal istinbath method in the Book of Bidayatul Mujtahid wa Nihayatul Muqtasid about the inheritance of different religions. From the results of the author's research, there are several results, namely: Ibn Rushd in deciding an Islamic law employment the Qur'an and al-Sunnah as the most premise. But since the two sources are exceptionally constrained, he too employments ijtihad as an elective strategy to unravel the developing issues of Sharia law. In fathoming the progressively complex issues of Sharia law, Ibn Rushd broadly utilized qiyas (similarity). Another result regarding inheritance from different religions, in the Bidayatul Mujtahid book, is explained: First, there is no inheritance between the two. Regarding inheritance between different religions, the book Bidayatul Mujtahid explains: First, there is no inheritance between the two. Given the concept of fiqh mawaris, a Muslim cannot inherit the property of a non-Muslim, and vice versa a non-Muslim cannot inherit the property of a Muslim. Secondly, Ats-Tsauri and the majority of the scholars of Kuffah, as well as the majority of the scholars of Basrah think that his inheritance can be passed on to Muslim heirs, but not vice versa. This opinion was also derived from Ibn Mas'ud and Ali ibn Abi Talib.
Interpretasi Hadis Larangan Melukis Prespektif Hermeneutika (Fazlur Rahman) Dharmawan, M. Alvin Setia; Shodiqi, Fauzan; Mukaromah, Kholila; Ma'mun, Mohamad; MF, Moh Shofiyul Huda; Masuwd, Mowafg
Canonia Religia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/cr.v1i2.1672

Abstract

Beauty is a quality greatly appreciated for its ability to soothe the heart and delight the eye. In art, beauty manifests through the cultural and spiritual expression of humanity. Visual arts, such as painting and photography, serve not only as adornments but also as mediums for conveying messages and emotions, linking personal expression with collective experiences. However, a hadith of the Prophet Muhammad SAW suggests that Islam does not sanction painting, stating that those who engage in it will face severe punishment in the afterlife. This necessitates a detailed and nuanced interpretative study of the hadith. This research adopts a thematic approach to analyse the hadith by reviewing its texts and related literature. Contextualisation is achieved by examining the historical context of the hadith and applying a hermeneutic method from Fazlur Rahman’s perspective, specifically through the concept of double movement. This method aims to clarify the context and purpose behind the prohibition of painting. The study explores how the hadith’s interpretation can be adjusted to fit modern social contexts and address potential misconceptions in contemporary art practices. The findings indicate that the prohibition is primarily aimed at preventing idolatry and worship. By using Fazlur Rahman’s perspective, it becomes evident that, within a modern context, painting does not necessarily involve worship and can be accepted as a form of creative expression. This highlights the need to adapt Islamic legal interpretations to social changes while maintaining core religious principles, thereby reducing misunderstandings in the development of contemporary art.
Co-Authors Dharmawan, M. Alvin Setia Masuwd, Mowafg MF, Moh Shofiyul Huda Mukaromah, Kholila Shodiqi, Fauzan