Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bayani Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Azis, Pahrudin
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa: Litigasi Dan Non-Litigasi Azis, Pahrudin; Kholid, Muhamad; Nasrudin, Nasrudin
Qanuniya : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Qanuniya : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/qanuniya.v1i2.896

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas perbandingan lembaga penyelesaian sengketa melalui litigasi dan non-litigasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan memberikan perbandingan mendalam antara keduanya serta mengevaluasi keunggulan dan kelemahan masing-masing metode dalam konteks hukum di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, dan dokumen akademik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa litigasi, dengan kepastian hukum dan keputusan final, cocok untuk sengketa kompleks, sedangkan non-litigasi, seperti mediasi dan arbitrase, lebih efektif untuk penyelesaian cepat dan menjaga hubungan berkelanjutan. Kebaharuan artikel ini terletak pada pembahasan strategis mengenai faktor-faktor seperti urgensi penyelesaian, sensitivitas informasi, dan hubungan antar pihak, yang memberikan wawasan komprehensif bagi praktisi hukum dan masyarakat dalam memilih metode penyelesaian sengketa yang tepat.
Telaah Kritis Gaya Komunikasi Kang Dedi Mulyadi dalam Forum Musrenbang Berdasarkan Etika Hukum dan Komunikasi Islam Azis, Pahrudin; Dermawan, Herman
Bayani Vol 5 No 1 (2025): Bayani: Jurnal Studi Islam
Publisher : LPPAIK Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/bayaniV.5I.1pp131-147

Abstract

This article critically examines Kang Dedi Mulyadi's communication style in the Musrenbang (Development Planning Forum) through the lenses of legal ethics and Islamic communication principles. The core issue addressed is the controversy surrounding his confrontational communication style toward formal institutions, raising concerns about ethical boundaries in public official discourse. The study aims to assess whether his communication aligns with the principles of good governance and Islamic values. Using a qualitative descriptive method with a normative-ethical and case study approach, data were collected from video documentation, speech transcripts, official responses from the DPRD, and public opinion. The findings reveal that Kang Dedi's communication style is populist and symbolic, effectively building emotional resonance with the public but risking violations of institutional ethics. From an Islamic perspective, while his communication reflects honesty and truthfulness, it requires balance through wisdom and responsibility to avoid counterproductive discord. The study concludes that a public official's communication must balance persuasive personal expression with institutional and ethical demands to remain constructive within a democratic framework.
Co-Authors Herman Dermawan Muhamad Kholid, Muhamad Nasrudin