Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Fanatisme Politik Islam: Ideologisasi Partai Ka’bah di Jepara Masa Orde Baru dan Pasca Reformasi Qosim, M. Rizal
Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Staatsrecht Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/staatsrecht.v1i1.2373

Abstract

Dinamika politik dan parpol Islam di Jepara menunjukkan sebuah transformasi politik yang cukup radikal. Fanatisme politik masyarakat Jepara belakangan semakin luntur. Mereka bisa goyah dengan banyak pilihan politik yang ada.  Politik Jepara yang dulunya didominasi warna ‘hijau’ sekarang mulai dikuasai oleh warna ‘merah’. Perubahan ini tentunya menarik untuk diteliti. Hal yang hendak diungkap dari penelitian ini adalah apa faktor yang menyebabka fanatisme politik di Jepara dan apa faktor yang melahirkan transformasi politik Jepara dari ‘hijau’ ke ‘merah’.  Penelitian ini hendak menjawab dua rumusan masalah; apa yang menyebabkan masyarakat muslim Jepara menjadi ideologis dan fanatis terhadap PPP; dan mengapa terjadi pergeseran dari fanatisme PPP menjadi pragmatis dalam berpolitik di Jepara?
The Politicization of Religion and Law Enforcement in Indonesia's Democratic Elections: An Islamic Legal Perspective Qosim, M. Rizal; Hariz, Hajar Salamah Salsabila; Arowosaiye, Yusuf Ibrahim; Azizah, Mabarroh; Idamatussilmi
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic University of Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v19i2.15244

Abstract

The politicization of religion in Indonesia's democratic elections represents a structural challenge that disrupts constitutional governance, weakens legal neutrality, and conflicts with the normative principles articulated in al-Māwardī's fiqh siyāsah dustūriyyah. While existing scholarship has addressed the interplay between religion and politics, few studies examine how the strategic manipulation of religious symbols and clerical authority erodes institutional integrity when analysed through al-Māwardī's framework of governance. This study investigates the mechanisms and consequences of religious politicization by integrating key concepts of al-Māwardī, such as ʿadl (justice), amānah (trust), wilāyah al-qaḍā' (judicial authority), and ḥisbah (public oversight) as constitutional ethical standards for political conduct. Utilising a qualitative descriptive method and case study approach, the research analyses interactions among political elites, religious actors, and law enforcement bodies to understand how these relationships influence decision-making processes. The findings reveal three constitutional distortions: the instrumentalisation of religious narratives to delegitimise political opponents; the intervention of religious groups in judicial processes that threaten the independence of legal institutions; and transactional alliances that compromise the objectivity of state authority. From the perspective of al-Māwardī's fiqh siyāsah, these practices violate maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, especially the preservation of justice, intellect, and social cohesion, and contradict the constitutional ethics expected of legitimate governance. This study concludes that religious politicization functions as a systemic threat to the rule of law, undermines public trust, and deviates from al-Māwardī's normative model of just political authority. The research contributes a jurisprudential framework demonstrating how fiqh siyāsah dustūriyyah can guide ethical and accountable governance in contemporary Muslim-majority political systems.