Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Influence of Preparation Design on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Full-Coverage Crowns in Jakarta, Indonesia Alexander Mulya; Nabila Saraswati; Serena Jackson; Made Swastika; Zainal Abidin Hasan
Crown: Journal of Dentistry and Health Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Crown: Journal of Dentistry and Health Research
Publisher : Phlox Institute: Indonesian Medical Research Organization

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59345/crown.v1i2.89

Abstract

Introduction: Endodontically treated teeth are more susceptible to fracture due to the loss of tooth structure and moisture. Full-coverage crowns are often used to restore these teeth and enhance their fracture resistance. However, the influence of different preparation designs on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth remains a topic of investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with full-coverage crowns with different preparation designs in Jakarta, Indonesia. Methods: Forty extracted human premolars were endodontically treated and divided into four groups (n=10): Group 1: Butt-joint margin with a 1 mm chamfer finish line; Group 2: Shoulder margin with a 1.5 mm chamfer finish line; Group 3: Deep chamfer margin with a 2 mm chamfer finish line; and Group 4: Shoulder margin with a rounded shoulder finish line. All teeth were prepared for full-coverage crowns and restored with standardized metal-ceramic crowns. A universal testing machine was used to apply compressive load to the teeth until fracture. The fracture resistance values were recorded in Newtons (N) and analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). Results: The mean fracture resistance values (N) were as follows: Group 1 (1250 ± 150), Group 2 (1480 ± 180), Group 3 (1180 ± 130), and Group 4 (1550 ± 200). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in fracture resistance among the groups (p<0.05). Tukey's post-hoc test indicated that Group 4 exhibited significantly higher fracture resistance than Group 1 and Group 3 (p<0.05). Group 2 also demonstrated significantly higher fracture resistance than Group 3 (p<0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the shoulder margin with a rounded shoulder finish line provided the highest fracture resistance for endodontically treated teeth restored with full-coverage crowns. The butt-joint margin and deep chamfer margin preparations exhibited lower fracture resistance.
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) versus Glass Ionomer Cement in Arresting Carious Lesions in Primary Molars: A Community-Based Cohort Study Winata Putri; Sophia Lucille Rodriguez; Sarah Armalia; Alexander Mulya
Crown: Journal of Dentistry and Health Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Crown: Journal of Dentistry and Health Research
Publisher : Phlox Institute: Indonesian Medical Research Organization

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59345/crown.v3i1.238

Abstract

Introduction: Early Childhood Caries (ECC) is a significant global health problem. Minimally invasive treatments like Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) and Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) are crucial, but long-term comparative effectiveness data from real-world community settings are scarce. This study aimed to compare the three-year clinical performance of 38% SDF versus high-viscosity GIC in arresting active carious lesions in the primary molars of preschool children. Methods: This study was designed as a three-year, prospective, non-randomized, community-based cohort study in an underserved urban population in South Sumatra, Indonesia. A total of 450 children aged 3-5 years with at least one active cavitated carious lesion (ICDAS 5/6) in a primary molar were enrolled. Following parental consent and choice, lesions were treated with either a single application of 38% SDF or a high-viscosity GIC restoration using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) technique. Calibrated examiners assessed the lesions for caries arrest at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months using standardized visual-tactile criteria. The primary outcome was the proportion of arrested lesions. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 620 lesions (309 SDF, 311 GIC) were treated and followed. At the 36-month follow-up, the caries arrest rate in the SDF group was 81.2%, which was significantly higher than the 64.8% arrest rate observed in the GIC group (χ² = 24.5, p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a significantly higher probability of lesions remaining in an arrested state in the SDF group over the three-year period (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The Cox regression model identified the treatment modality as the primary predictor of failure, with GIC having a hazard ratio of 2.15 (95% CI: 1.55-2.98) compared to SDF. Conclusion: Within the parameters of this community-based cohort study, a single application of 38% SDF was significantly more effective in arresting active carious lesions in primary molars over a three-year period than high-viscosity GIC applied via the ART technique. These findings support the prioritization of SDF in public health programs for managing ECC.