Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Case Law Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal (INS9MJ) Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
M. Fazli Pratama
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK DALAM PUTUSAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Joni Sandri Ritonga; Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan; Annisa Putri Sinaga; M. Fazli Pratama; Vressilia Witama; Faiz Putra Ramadhan Lubis; Nadilah Andini
Case Law : Journal of Law Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Case Law : Journal of Law | Januari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/caselaw.v6i1.4731

Abstract

Penerapan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik (AUPB) memiliki peran penting dalam penegakan hukum administrasi di Indonesia, khususnya dalam putusan peradilan tata usaha negara (PTUN). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana penerapan AUPB memengaruhi kualitas dan keadilan putusan PTUN. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan dengan mengkaji literatur, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan putusan PTUN yang relevan. AUPB, yang mencakup asas kepastian hukum, asas kecermatan, asas keterbukaan, dan asas profesionalitas, merupakan pedoman bagi hakim dalam menguji keputusan administrasi pemerintah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan AUPB dalam PTUN membantu menciptakan putusan yang tidak hanya memenuhi aspek formal hukum, tetapi juga substansi keadilan. Putusan PTUN yang berlandaskan AUPB mampu melindungi hak-hak masyarakat dari tindakan pemerintah yang sewenang-wenang, sekaligus mendorong akuntabilitas dan transparansi dalam pemerintahan. Namun, terdapat kendala dalam penerapannya, seperti kurangnya pemahaman hakim terhadap substansi AUPB dan lemahnya harmonisasi antara peraturan perundang-undangan dan prinsip AUPB. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya penguatan kapasitas hakim, harmonisasi regulasi, dan sosialisasi AUPB kepada aparatur pemerintah. Dengan penerapan AUPB secara konsisten, PTUN dapat menjadi instrumen efektif dalam mewujudkan pemerintahan yang bersih dan berkeadilan.
Investor Protection Through Arbitration: The Urgency of Alternative Mechanism in Resolving Investment Disputes in Indonesia Ikhsan Sahriyan; M. Fazli Pratama; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Usamah Zaki
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1312

Abstract

This study examines the strategic role of arbitration as a mechanism for resolving investment disputes in Indonesia. Investment plays a vital role in national economic development, yet it inherently carries the potential for conflicts between investors, business partners, and the government. Conventional litigation often proves lengthy, costly, and insufficiently confidential, prompting a demand for alternative dispute resolution. This research employs normative legal methods (doctrinal research), using statute and conceptual approaches to analyze relevant legislation, including Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment, as well as arbitral awards and scholarly literature. The study systematically identifies legal issues, collects and classifies legal materials, and applies qualitative analysis through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. Findings indicate that arbitration provides legal certainty, procedural flexibility, neutrality, and enforceable outcomes, strengthened by Indonesia’s ratification of the 1958 New York Convention. Despite legal and practical challenges, arbitration effectively protects investor rights, supports a conducive investment climate, and enhances Indonesia’s economic competitiveness. Recommendations include strengthening institutions, human resources, and future research aligned with digital and cross-border investments.
Islamic Law and Positive Law Protection for Victims of False Accusations of Adultery in the Modern Era Aicha Azdina Adly Fesya; M. Fazli Pratama; Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Habiburriziq El Ardhy Saragih
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Nine Star Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v3i1.1328

Abstract

This study employs a normative qualitative method with an analysis of classical and contemporary literature. The paper examines accusations of zina and legal protection for victims in the digital era. The background of the study is rooted in the complexity of the dissemination of zina allegations through social media and digital communication platforms, which have serious implications for individual honor, social reputation, and moral integrity. From the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, unsubstantiated allegations are categorized as qadhf, requiring stringent evidentiary standards, including the testimony of four morally upright male witnesses or a voluntary confession, with violations attracting multidimensional sanctions such as corporal punishment, social discredit, and spiritual accountability. Indonesian positive law provides protection through the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), allowing victims to pursue criminal liability, compensation, and reputational rehabilitation. The results indicate that effective legal protection requires a multi-layered approach integrating law enforcement, technological interventions, and public education to restore victims’ social credibility and enhance deterrence against false accusations.
Investor Protection Through Arbitration: The Urgency of Alternative Mechanism in Resolving Investment Disputes in Indonesia Ikhsan Sahriyan; M. Fazli Pratama; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Usamah Zaki
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1312

Abstract

This study examines the strategic role of arbitration as a mechanism for resolving investment disputes in Indonesia. Investment plays a vital role in national economic development, yet it inherently carries the potential for conflicts between investors, business partners, and the government. Conventional litigation often proves lengthy, costly, and insufficiently confidential, prompting a demand for alternative dispute resolution. This research employs normative legal methods (doctrinal research), using statute and conceptual approaches to analyze relevant legislation, including Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment, as well as arbitral awards and scholarly literature. The study systematically identifies legal issues, collects and classifies legal materials, and applies qualitative analysis through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. Findings indicate that arbitration provides legal certainty, procedural flexibility, neutrality, and enforceable outcomes, strengthened by Indonesia’s ratification of the 1958 New York Convention. Despite legal and practical challenges, arbitration effectively protects investor rights, supports a conducive investment climate, and enhances Indonesia’s economic competitiveness. Recommendations include strengthening institutions, human resources, and future research aligned with digital and cross-border investments.
Co-Authors Aicha Azdina Adly Fesya Annisa Putri Sinaga Faiz Putra Ramadhan Lubis Habiburriziq El Ardhy Saragih Ikhsan Sahriyan Joni Sandri Ritonga Nadilah Andini Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe Usamah Zaki Vressilia Witama